搜索引擎对导航查询的检索效率

D. Lewandowski
{"title":"搜索引擎对导航查询的检索效率","authors":"D. Lewandowski","doi":"10.1108/00012531111148949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to test major web search engines on their performance on navigational queries, i.e. searches for homepages.Design/methodology/approach – In total, 100 user queries are posed to six search engines (Google, Yahoo!, MSN, Ask, Seekport, and Exalead). Users described the desired pages, and the results position of these was recorded. Measured success and mean reciprocal rank are calculated.Findings – The performance of the major search engines Google, Yahoo!, and MSN was found to be the best, with around 90 per cent of queries answered correctly. Ask and Exalead performed worse but received good scores as well.Research limitations/implications – All queries were in German, and the German‐language interfaces of the search engines were used. Therefore, the results are only valid for German queries.Practical implications – When designing a search engine to compete with the major search engines, care should be taken on the performance on navigational queries. Users can be infl...","PeriodicalId":55449,"journal":{"name":"Aslib Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The retrieval effectiveness of search engines on navigational queries\",\"authors\":\"D. Lewandowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/00012531111148949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to test major web search engines on their performance on navigational queries, i.e. searches for homepages.Design/methodology/approach – In total, 100 user queries are posed to six search engines (Google, Yahoo!, MSN, Ask, Seekport, and Exalead). Users described the desired pages, and the results position of these was recorded. Measured success and mean reciprocal rank are calculated.Findings – The performance of the major search engines Google, Yahoo!, and MSN was found to be the best, with around 90 per cent of queries answered correctly. Ask and Exalead performed worse but received good scores as well.Research limitations/implications – All queries were in German, and the German‐language interfaces of the search engines were used. Therefore, the results are only valid for German queries.Practical implications – When designing a search engine to compete with the major search engines, care should be taken on the performance on navigational queries. Users can be infl...\",\"PeriodicalId\":55449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aslib Proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aslib Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111148949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aslib Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111148949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

目的——本文的目的是测试主要的网络搜索引擎在导航查询(即搜索主页)方面的性能。设计/方法/方法——总共有100个用户查询被提交给6个搜索引擎(Google, Yahoo!、MSN、Ask、Seekport和Exalead)。用户描述所需的页面,并记录这些页面的结果位置。计算测量成功和平均互惠等级。主要搜索引擎Google, Yahoo!,而MSN被发现是最好的,大约有90%的问题得到正确回答。Ask和Exalead表现较差,但得分也不错。研究限制/影响-所有查询都是用德语进行的,并且使用了搜索引擎的德语界面。因此,结果只对德语查询有效。实际意义——当设计一个搜索引擎与主要的搜索引擎竞争时,应该注意导航查询的性能。用户可以填充…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The retrieval effectiveness of search engines on navigational queries
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to test major web search engines on their performance on navigational queries, i.e. searches for homepages.Design/methodology/approach – In total, 100 user queries are posed to six search engines (Google, Yahoo!, MSN, Ask, Seekport, and Exalead). Users described the desired pages, and the results position of these was recorded. Measured success and mean reciprocal rank are calculated.Findings – The performance of the major search engines Google, Yahoo!, and MSN was found to be the best, with around 90 per cent of queries answered correctly. Ask and Exalead performed worse but received good scores as well.Research limitations/implications – All queries were in German, and the German‐language interfaces of the search engines were used. Therefore, the results are only valid for German queries.Practical implications – When designing a search engine to compete with the major search engines, care should be taken on the performance on navigational queries. Users can be infl...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aslib Proceedings
Aslib Proceedings 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unearthing historical insights: semantic organization and application of historical newspapers from a fine-grained knowledge element perspective Investigating the consumption behavior of young adults using online food delivery platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic Factors influencing customer satisfaction with AR shopping assistant applications in e-commerce: an empirical analysis utilizing text-mining techniques The role of positive online reviews in risk-based consumer behaviours: an information processing perspective Assessing the informational credibility of conspiracy theories: online discussion about the Nord Stream damage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1