Georgiana-Aura Giurgea , Elodie Karkutli , Susanne Granegger , Robert Berent , Kurt Derfler , Helmut Sinzinger
{"title":"左室射血分数(LVEF)降低患者脂蛋白采血1年随访。","authors":"Georgiana-Aura Giurgea , Elodie Karkutli , Susanne Granegger , Robert Berent , Kurt Derfler , Helmut Sinzinger","doi":"10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2019.08.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a valuable measure to assess left ventricular </span>systolic function<span>. Lipid lowering therapy by statins has been shown to have an impact on LVEF already after a 6 months treatment. Higher doses of statins have been claimed to be more effective as compared to a conventional one and even a difference between lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds has been reported. The effect of regular lipoprotein-apheresis (LP-apheresis) on LVEF was previously poorly examined.</span></p><p>Patients involved in a regular LP-apheresis program are supposed to undergo a number of follow-up investigations among them myocardial scintigraphy<span> and LVEF, measured by radionuclide ventriculography.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We examined 18 patients before initiation and after one year of ongoing LP-apheresis. 13 patients (11 males, 2 females, mean age 58.3 ± 5.3 years, groups A) were since more than a year on stable, unchanged statin treatment (atorvastatin 40 mg, simvastatin<span> 40 mg, rosuvastatin 20 mg±ezetimibe), the other 5 patients (3 males, 2 females, mean age 57.1 ± 4.6 years, group B) were intolerant to statins being on micronized fenofibrate±resorption inhibitors (cholestyramine). All patients had a Lp(a) < 30 mg/dl. As part of the usual follow-up monitoring, LVEF was determined by means of radionuclide ventriculography after application of 550 MBq </span></span><sup>99m</sup> Tc-pertechnetate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The follow-up LVEF was checked at a mean of 48.7 weeks in group A and 51.2 weeks in group B. Except in 1 patient (LVEF 46.8% before vs. 45.2% after LP-apheresis initiation) in group A we noted a significant increase in LVEF in 12 patients of group A (92%) and in all patients of group B. Mean LVEF increased significantly in both groups (A: 42.7±8.1 → 46.5±7.5% (p < 0.001) and B: 41.9±8.4 → 46.5±6.3 %; p < 0.001). The relative rise was nearly identical (group A 9.6%, in group B 9.7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings indicate that regular long-term LP-apheresis treatment apparently increases LVEF, independently on current statin treatment. This implies a role of lowering of atherogenic lipoproteins as underlying mechanism. A prospective study should clarify the relative extent of LVEF improvement induced by LP-apheresis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8592,"journal":{"name":"Atherosclerosis. Supplements","volume":"40 ","pages":"Pages 44-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2019.08.039","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One year follow-up of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on lipoprotein apheresis\",\"authors\":\"Georgiana-Aura Giurgea , Elodie Karkutli , Susanne Granegger , Robert Berent , Kurt Derfler , Helmut Sinzinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2019.08.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a valuable measure to assess left ventricular </span>systolic function<span>. Lipid lowering therapy by statins has been shown to have an impact on LVEF already after a 6 months treatment. Higher doses of statins have been claimed to be more effective as compared to a conventional one and even a difference between lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds has been reported. The effect of regular lipoprotein-apheresis (LP-apheresis) on LVEF was previously poorly examined.</span></p><p>Patients involved in a regular LP-apheresis program are supposed to undergo a number of follow-up investigations among them myocardial scintigraphy<span> and LVEF, measured by radionuclide ventriculography.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We examined 18 patients before initiation and after one year of ongoing LP-apheresis. 13 patients (11 males, 2 females, mean age 58.3 ± 5.3 years, groups A) were since more than a year on stable, unchanged statin treatment (atorvastatin 40 mg, simvastatin<span> 40 mg, rosuvastatin 20 mg±ezetimibe), the other 5 patients (3 males, 2 females, mean age 57.1 ± 4.6 years, group B) were intolerant to statins being on micronized fenofibrate±resorption inhibitors (cholestyramine). All patients had a Lp(a) < 30 mg/dl. As part of the usual follow-up monitoring, LVEF was determined by means of radionuclide ventriculography after application of 550 MBq </span></span><sup>99m</sup> Tc-pertechnetate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The follow-up LVEF was checked at a mean of 48.7 weeks in group A and 51.2 weeks in group B. Except in 1 patient (LVEF 46.8% before vs. 45.2% after LP-apheresis initiation) in group A we noted a significant increase in LVEF in 12 patients of group A (92%) and in all patients of group B. Mean LVEF increased significantly in both groups (A: 42.7±8.1 → 46.5±7.5% (p < 0.001) and B: 41.9±8.4 → 46.5±6.3 %; p < 0.001). The relative rise was nearly identical (group A 9.6%, in group B 9.7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings indicate that regular long-term LP-apheresis treatment apparently increases LVEF, independently on current statin treatment. This implies a role of lowering of atherogenic lipoproteins as underlying mechanism. A prospective study should clarify the relative extent of LVEF improvement induced by LP-apheresis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atherosclerosis. Supplements\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 44-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2019.08.039\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atherosclerosis. Supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567568819300625\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atherosclerosis. Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567568819300625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
One year follow-up of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on lipoprotein apheresis
Background
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a valuable measure to assess left ventricular systolic function. Lipid lowering therapy by statins has been shown to have an impact on LVEF already after a 6 months treatment. Higher doses of statins have been claimed to be more effective as compared to a conventional one and even a difference between lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds has been reported. The effect of regular lipoprotein-apheresis (LP-apheresis) on LVEF was previously poorly examined.
Patients involved in a regular LP-apheresis program are supposed to undergo a number of follow-up investigations among them myocardial scintigraphy and LVEF, measured by radionuclide ventriculography.
Methods
We examined 18 patients before initiation and after one year of ongoing LP-apheresis. 13 patients (11 males, 2 females, mean age 58.3 ± 5.3 years, groups A) were since more than a year on stable, unchanged statin treatment (atorvastatin 40 mg, simvastatin 40 mg, rosuvastatin 20 mg±ezetimibe), the other 5 patients (3 males, 2 females, mean age 57.1 ± 4.6 years, group B) were intolerant to statins being on micronized fenofibrate±resorption inhibitors (cholestyramine). All patients had a Lp(a) < 30 mg/dl. As part of the usual follow-up monitoring, LVEF was determined by means of radionuclide ventriculography after application of 550 MBq 99m Tc-pertechnetate.
Results
The follow-up LVEF was checked at a mean of 48.7 weeks in group A and 51.2 weeks in group B. Except in 1 patient (LVEF 46.8% before vs. 45.2% after LP-apheresis initiation) in group A we noted a significant increase in LVEF in 12 patients of group A (92%) and in all patients of group B. Mean LVEF increased significantly in both groups (A: 42.7±8.1 → 46.5±7.5% (p < 0.001) and B: 41.9±8.4 → 46.5±6.3 %; p < 0.001). The relative rise was nearly identical (group A 9.6%, in group B 9.7%).
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that regular long-term LP-apheresis treatment apparently increases LVEF, independently on current statin treatment. This implies a role of lowering of atherogenic lipoproteins as underlying mechanism. A prospective study should clarify the relative extent of LVEF improvement induced by LP-apheresis.
期刊介绍:
Atherosclerosis brings together, from all sources, papers concerned with investigation on atherosclerosis, its risk factors and clinical manifestations.