建筑教育者对学生预写生的看法

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Education through Art Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1386/eta_00075_1
L. Alipour
{"title":"建筑教育者对学生预写生的看法","authors":"L. Alipour","doi":"10.1386/eta_00075_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different individuals have different perception of artworks. This study aims to find the differences between architecture educators and other interpreters in perceiving architecture students’ pre-sketching. For this purpose, the images of architecture students’ pre-sketches\n were interpreted by three groups. The information perceived from the students’ pre-sketching was coded and categorized as description, analysis, cognition, emotion, artist and evaluation. The results indicate that the focus of architecture educators was on formal aspects,\n architects tended to notice students’ architectural abilities while interpretations of educators from other disciplines emphasized the perception of meaning and emotion. The results also show the special role of educators’ perception in education through art.","PeriodicalId":43940,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education through Art","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The perception of students’ pre-sketching by architecture educators\",\"authors\":\"L. Alipour\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/eta_00075_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different individuals have different perception of artworks. This study aims to find the differences between architecture educators and other interpreters in perceiving architecture students’ pre-sketching. For this purpose, the images of architecture students’ pre-sketches\\n were interpreted by three groups. The information perceived from the students’ pre-sketching was coded and categorized as description, analysis, cognition, emotion, artist and evaluation. The results indicate that the focus of architecture educators was on formal aspects,\\n architects tended to notice students’ architectural abilities while interpretations of educators from other disciplines emphasized the perception of meaning and emotion. The results also show the special role of educators’ perception in education through art.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Education through Art\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Education through Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00075_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education through Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00075_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同的人对艺术品有不同的看法。本研究旨在发现建筑教育者和其他诠释者在理解建筑学生的预写生方面的差异。为此,建筑系学生的预草图图像被三组解读。从学生的预写生中感知到的信息被编码并分类为描述、分析、认知、情感、艺术家和评价。结果表明,建筑教育者的重点是形式方面,建筑师倾向于注意学生的建筑能力,而其他学科的教育者的解释则强调对意义和情感的感知。研究结果也显示了教育者的感知在艺术教育中的特殊作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The perception of students’ pre-sketching by architecture educators
Different individuals have different perception of artworks. This study aims to find the differences between architecture educators and other interpreters in perceiving architecture students’ pre-sketching. For this purpose, the images of architecture students’ pre-sketches were interpreted by three groups. The information perceived from the students’ pre-sketching was coded and categorized as description, analysis, cognition, emotion, artist and evaluation. The results indicate that the focus of architecture educators was on formal aspects, architects tended to notice students’ architectural abilities while interpretations of educators from other disciplines emphasized the perception of meaning and emotion. The results also show the special role of educators’ perception in education through art.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Education through Art
International Journal of Education through Art EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: International Journal of Education Through Art is published in partnership with InSEA. The International Journal of Education Through Art is an English language journal that promotes relationships between art and education. The term ‘art education’ should be taken to include art, craft and design education. Each issue, published three times a year within a single volume, consists of peer-reviewed articles mainly in the form of research reports and critical essays, but may also include exhibition reviews and image-text features.
期刊最新文献
Crafting visual autoethnography to develop preservice art teachers’ reflexivity and teaching philosophies Co-creating digital art with generative AI in K-9 education: Socio-material insights Considering the arts in school assessment in the United States: An investigation of engagement and hope Youth4Sea and marine debris: An arts-based, site-specific, youth-framed inquiry The cutting edge in Ghanaian contemporary ceramics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1