{"title":"从词汇整理到重要的遗漏和释义:在良心之刺第四组手稿中精炼关系的新证据","authors":"Edurne Garrido","doi":"10.17811/selim.27.2022.114-165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The Prick of Conscience is known to have survived in 97 manuscripts of the Main Version, 19 \nof the Southern Recension, and about 50 short extracts. An initial collation of one lexical item in the 97 \nextant copies of the Main Version and subsequent comparison of another 109 items in 54 of these copies \nallow for identifying parallel variant readings throughout the poem’s almost 10,000 lines. Those variants \noften transcend the word level affecting the line, the couplet, or more extensive passages. This paper \ncontributes to refining textual relations within the Group-IV family of the work by showing distinct \nvariance common to Dublin, Trinity College, 157 (D.4.11) (MV 21), London, Sion College, Arc. L. 40. \n2/E. 25 (MV 49), and Shrewsbury, School, III (Mus. III. 39) (MV 95). Apart from unfolding and expanding \nthe extent of the relationship pointed out by Lewis & McIntosh (1982), this research also proves that the \nhitherto unsubclassified London, Lambeth Palace, 492 (MV 48) is another member of the subgroup. To \nillustrate how the proposed subset relates to a version closer to the presumed original and other Group-IV \nwitnesses, readings from the following London, British Library manuscripts are also provided for reference: \nCotton Galba E. IX (MV 27); Harley 4196 (MV 34); Egerton 657 (MV 29); Additional 22283 (MV 40).","PeriodicalId":44450,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Studies","volume":"211 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From lexical collation to significant omissions and paraphrases: New evidence for refining relations within the Prick of Conscience Group-IV Manuscripts\",\"authors\":\"Edurne Garrido\",\"doi\":\"10.17811/selim.27.2022.114-165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: The Prick of Conscience is known to have survived in 97 manuscripts of the Main Version, 19 \\nof the Southern Recension, and about 50 short extracts. An initial collation of one lexical item in the 97 \\nextant copies of the Main Version and subsequent comparison of another 109 items in 54 of these copies \\nallow for identifying parallel variant readings throughout the poem’s almost 10,000 lines. Those variants \\noften transcend the word level affecting the line, the couplet, or more extensive passages. This paper \\ncontributes to refining textual relations within the Group-IV family of the work by showing distinct \\nvariance common to Dublin, Trinity College, 157 (D.4.11) (MV 21), London, Sion College, Arc. L. 40. \\n2/E. 25 (MV 49), and Shrewsbury, School, III (Mus. III. 39) (MV 95). Apart from unfolding and expanding \\nthe extent of the relationship pointed out by Lewis & McIntosh (1982), this research also proves that the \\nhitherto unsubclassified London, Lambeth Palace, 492 (MV 48) is another member of the subgroup. To \\nillustrate how the proposed subset relates to a version closer to the presumed original and other Group-IV \\nwitnesses, readings from the following London, British Library manuscripts are also provided for reference: \\nCotton Galba E. IX (MV 27); Harley 4196 (MV 34); Egerton 657 (MV 29); Additional 22283 (MV 40).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of English Studies\",\"volume\":\"211 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17811/selim.27.2022.114-165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17811/selim.27.2022.114-165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
From lexical collation to significant omissions and paraphrases: New evidence for refining relations within the Prick of Conscience Group-IV Manuscripts
Abstract: The Prick of Conscience is known to have survived in 97 manuscripts of the Main Version, 19
of the Southern Recension, and about 50 short extracts. An initial collation of one lexical item in the 97
extant copies of the Main Version and subsequent comparison of another 109 items in 54 of these copies
allow for identifying parallel variant readings throughout the poem’s almost 10,000 lines. Those variants
often transcend the word level affecting the line, the couplet, or more extensive passages. This paper
contributes to refining textual relations within the Group-IV family of the work by showing distinct
variance common to Dublin, Trinity College, 157 (D.4.11) (MV 21), London, Sion College, Arc. L. 40.
2/E. 25 (MV 49), and Shrewsbury, School, III (Mus. III. 39) (MV 95). Apart from unfolding and expanding
the extent of the relationship pointed out by Lewis & McIntosh (1982), this research also proves that the
hitherto unsubclassified London, Lambeth Palace, 492 (MV 48) is another member of the subgroup. To
illustrate how the proposed subset relates to a version closer to the presumed original and other Group-IV
witnesses, readings from the following London, British Library manuscripts are also provided for reference:
Cotton Galba E. IX (MV 27); Harley 4196 (MV 34); Egerton 657 (MV 29); Additional 22283 (MV 40).
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of English Studies (IJES) is a double-blind peer review journal which seeks to reflect the newest research in the general field of English Studies: English Language and Linguistics, Applied English Linguistics, Literature in English and Cultural studies of English-speaking countries. We will give preference to keeping the balance amongst the areas and subareas belonging to English Studies whenever possible.