棕地注水管理-实地试验学习的战略实施,南阿曼

Yaqoob Abri, S. Choudhury, Mohamood Harthi, A. Anbari, Ali Lawati, Suhaib Ghatrifi, A. Sabahi, Iman Mahrooqi, B. Marpaung, H. Busaidi, Khalfan Harthy
{"title":"棕地注水管理-实地试验学习的战略实施,南阿曼","authors":"Yaqoob Abri, S. Choudhury, Mohamood Harthi, A. Anbari, Ali Lawati, Suhaib Ghatrifi, A. Sabahi, Iman Mahrooqi, B. Marpaung, H. Busaidi, Khalfan Harthy","doi":"10.2118/200059-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Waterflood response in a brownfield with complex reservoir dynamics have significantly delayed the expected water injection response in Field ‘A’. The field is one of the highest oil producers in Oman South, spead over ~37 Km2, with more than 400 active wells, contributing > 90,000 BoE/d over the last 3 decades. The field is producing under strong bottom aquifer water drive and improved oil recovery waterflood. Current field development is focused in drilling horizontal in-fill wells and maximize recovery through well reservoir and facility management (WRFM). Production is from a combination of Mahwis aeolian and Al Khlata glacial reservoir formations. Sub-surface challenges are to arrest pressure decline, enhance sweep efficiency, ramp-up water injection (target > 440,000 BoE/d), and source additional water and manage complex operations. The produced water from oil producing wells post treatment gets re-injected into the aquifer ~100m below oil water contact (‘Deep Injection’) with 38 vertical injectors. This ‘Deep Injection’ albeit have prolonged water breakthrough has yet not delivered the optimum oil drive efficiency. One of the key subsurface challenge is the unfavorable mobility contrast between the oil and water causing early water breakthrough. Field wide variable mobility contrast, presence of intra reservoir baffles and enlarged size of the aquifer compared the legacy model assumptions triggered a transformation of the improved recovery strategy of the field – both short term and longer term. More effective injection strategy through ‘Field Trials’ have now been deployed (viz. ‘Water Re-Distribution’, ‘Make-up Water Diversion’ and ‘Shallow Injection’) over the last two years. Initial response from these trials shows encouraging results in terms of pressure support and sweep efficiency. Learning from the trails are incorporated in the future development and asset management strategy.\n This paper highlights the ‘Field Trials’ – practical approaches implemented to manage and optimize the field performamance. In a cost competitive low oil price time the team focused in enhancing efficient and impactful trials which yields short-term production gains keeping in mind the longer term persepective.","PeriodicalId":10912,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brownfield Waterflood Management - Strategic Implementation of Field Trial Learning, South Oman\",\"authors\":\"Yaqoob Abri, S. Choudhury, Mohamood Harthi, A. Anbari, Ali Lawati, Suhaib Ghatrifi, A. Sabahi, Iman Mahrooqi, B. Marpaung, H. Busaidi, Khalfan Harthy\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/200059-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Waterflood response in a brownfield with complex reservoir dynamics have significantly delayed the expected water injection response in Field ‘A’. The field is one of the highest oil producers in Oman South, spead over ~37 Km2, with more than 400 active wells, contributing > 90,000 BoE/d over the last 3 decades. The field is producing under strong bottom aquifer water drive and improved oil recovery waterflood. Current field development is focused in drilling horizontal in-fill wells and maximize recovery through well reservoir and facility management (WRFM). Production is from a combination of Mahwis aeolian and Al Khlata glacial reservoir formations. Sub-surface challenges are to arrest pressure decline, enhance sweep efficiency, ramp-up water injection (target > 440,000 BoE/d), and source additional water and manage complex operations. The produced water from oil producing wells post treatment gets re-injected into the aquifer ~100m below oil water contact (‘Deep Injection’) with 38 vertical injectors. This ‘Deep Injection’ albeit have prolonged water breakthrough has yet not delivered the optimum oil drive efficiency. One of the key subsurface challenge is the unfavorable mobility contrast between the oil and water causing early water breakthrough. Field wide variable mobility contrast, presence of intra reservoir baffles and enlarged size of the aquifer compared the legacy model assumptions triggered a transformation of the improved recovery strategy of the field – both short term and longer term. More effective injection strategy through ‘Field Trials’ have now been deployed (viz. ‘Water Re-Distribution’, ‘Make-up Water Diversion’ and ‘Shallow Injection’) over the last two years. Initial response from these trials shows encouraging results in terms of pressure support and sweep efficiency. Learning from the trails are incorporated in the future development and asset management strategy.\\n This paper highlights the ‘Field Trials’ – practical approaches implemented to manage and optimize the field performamance. In a cost competitive low oil price time the team focused in enhancing efficient and impactful trials which yields short-term production gains keeping in mind the longer term persepective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/200059-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200059-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一个具有复杂储层动态的棕地,注水响应显著延迟了a油田的预期注水响应。该油田是阿曼南部产量最高的油田之一,面积约37平方公里,有400多口活跃井,在过去的30年里,产量超过9万桶油当量/天。该油田在底部含水层强水驱和提高采收率的水驱条件下进行生产。目前的油田开发主要集中在钻井水平充填井,并通过井、储层和设施管理(WRFM)实现采收率最大化。生产来自Mahwis风成层和Al Khlata冰川储层的组合。地下油藏面临的挑战包括阻止压力下降、提高波及效率、增加注水量(目标> 44万桶/天)、获取额外的水以及管理复杂的作业。处理后的采油井产出水通过38个垂直注入器重新注入到油水界面以下100米的含水层中(“深层注入”)。这种“深层注入”虽然延长了突水时间,但并没有带来最佳的驱油效率。其中一个关键的地下挑战是油水之间不利的流动性对比,导致早期的水侵。油田范围内的可变流动性对比、储层内部挡板的存在和含水层的扩大与传统模型假设相比,引发了油田改进采收率策略的转变——无论是短期还是长期。在过去两年中,通过“现场试验”,采用了更有效的注入策略(即“水再分配”、“补水分流”和“浅层注入”)。这些试验的初步反应表明,在压力支撑和扫井效率方面取得了令人鼓舞的结果。从这些经验中吸取的教训被纳入未来的发展和资产管理战略。本文重点介绍了“田间试验”——用于管理和优化田间性能的实用方法。在成本竞争激烈的低油价时期,团队专注于提高效率和有影响力的试验,以获得短期的产量收益,同时考虑到长期的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brownfield Waterflood Management - Strategic Implementation of Field Trial Learning, South Oman
Waterflood response in a brownfield with complex reservoir dynamics have significantly delayed the expected water injection response in Field ‘A’. The field is one of the highest oil producers in Oman South, spead over ~37 Km2, with more than 400 active wells, contributing > 90,000 BoE/d over the last 3 decades. The field is producing under strong bottom aquifer water drive and improved oil recovery waterflood. Current field development is focused in drilling horizontal in-fill wells and maximize recovery through well reservoir and facility management (WRFM). Production is from a combination of Mahwis aeolian and Al Khlata glacial reservoir formations. Sub-surface challenges are to arrest pressure decline, enhance sweep efficiency, ramp-up water injection (target > 440,000 BoE/d), and source additional water and manage complex operations. The produced water from oil producing wells post treatment gets re-injected into the aquifer ~100m below oil water contact (‘Deep Injection’) with 38 vertical injectors. This ‘Deep Injection’ albeit have prolonged water breakthrough has yet not delivered the optimum oil drive efficiency. One of the key subsurface challenge is the unfavorable mobility contrast between the oil and water causing early water breakthrough. Field wide variable mobility contrast, presence of intra reservoir baffles and enlarged size of the aquifer compared the legacy model assumptions triggered a transformation of the improved recovery strategy of the field – both short term and longer term. More effective injection strategy through ‘Field Trials’ have now been deployed (viz. ‘Water Re-Distribution’, ‘Make-up Water Diversion’ and ‘Shallow Injection’) over the last two years. Initial response from these trials shows encouraging results in terms of pressure support and sweep efficiency. Learning from the trails are incorporated in the future development and asset management strategy. This paper highlights the ‘Field Trials’ – practical approaches implemented to manage and optimize the field performamance. In a cost competitive low oil price time the team focused in enhancing efficient and impactful trials which yields short-term production gains keeping in mind the longer term persepective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sea-Fastening Analysis and Design of a Horizontally Transported Large Jacket Brownfield Waterflood Management - Strategic Implementation of Field Trial Learning, South Oman Interpretation of the Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Pilot in West Salym Using Tracers What is the Optimum Wettability for Oil Recovery Through Waterflooding? In-Situ Wettability Determination Using Magnetic Resonance Restricted Diffusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1