射频点火和爆轰危险分析中的概率因素

R.A. James, P.S. Excell, A.Z. Keller
{"title":"射频点火和爆轰危险分析中的概率因素","authors":"R.A. James,&nbsp;P.S. Excell,&nbsp;A.Z. Keller","doi":"10.1016/0143-8174(87)90012-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Radio-frequency (RF) radiation is capable, in unfortunate circumstances, of causing undesired ignition of flammable gaseous mixtures and undesired initiation of electroexplosive devices (EEDs). All existing safety standards are based on ‘worst-case’ analyses: this implies that if an event is considered realistically possible then protective measures must be applied as if its probability were unity. Effects that are considered very improbable are effectively assigned a probability of zero. This ‘binary’ approach is unsatisfactory for a number of reasons: in particular, the concatenation of apparently realistic worst-case factors frequently leads to unacceptably ‘pessimistic’ conclusions. The solution to such problems is to evaluate the probability of occurrence of each step in the hazard process. The paper reviews the bases of the new British Standards covering these hazards and presents an analysis of some of the probabilistic factors involved.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101070,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 139-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-8174(87)90012-6","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic factors in radio-frequency ignition and detonation hazards analyses\",\"authors\":\"R.A. James,&nbsp;P.S. Excell,&nbsp;A.Z. Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0143-8174(87)90012-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Radio-frequency (RF) radiation is capable, in unfortunate circumstances, of causing undesired ignition of flammable gaseous mixtures and undesired initiation of electroexplosive devices (EEDs). All existing safety standards are based on ‘worst-case’ analyses: this implies that if an event is considered realistically possible then protective measures must be applied as if its probability were unity. Effects that are considered very improbable are effectively assigned a probability of zero. This ‘binary’ approach is unsatisfactory for a number of reasons: in particular, the concatenation of apparently realistic worst-case factors frequently leads to unacceptably ‘pessimistic’ conclusions. The solution to such problems is to evaluate the probability of occurrence of each step in the hazard process. The paper reviews the bases of the new British Standards covering these hazards and presents an analysis of some of the probabilistic factors involved.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reliability Engineering\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 139-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-8174(87)90012-6\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reliability Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143817487900126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143817487900126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在不幸的情况下,射频(RF)辐射能够引起可燃气体混合物的不希望的点火和不希望的电爆炸装置(eed)的启动。所有现有的安全标准都是基于“最坏情况”的分析:这意味着如果一个事件被认为是现实可能发生的,那么保护措施必须被应用,就好像它的概率是统一的一样。那些被认为极不可能发生的效应实际上被赋予了零的概率。这种“二元”方法是不令人满意的,原因有很多:特别是,明显现实的最坏情况因素的串联经常导致不可接受的“悲观”结论。解决这类问题的方法是评估危害过程中每个步骤发生的概率。本文回顾了涵盖这些危害的新英国标准的基础,并对所涉及的一些概率因素进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Probabilistic factors in radio-frequency ignition and detonation hazards analyses

Radio-frequency (RF) radiation is capable, in unfortunate circumstances, of causing undesired ignition of flammable gaseous mixtures and undesired initiation of electroexplosive devices (EEDs). All existing safety standards are based on ‘worst-case’ analyses: this implies that if an event is considered realistically possible then protective measures must be applied as if its probability were unity. Effects that are considered very improbable are effectively assigned a probability of zero. This ‘binary’ approach is unsatisfactory for a number of reasons: in particular, the concatenation of apparently realistic worst-case factors frequently leads to unacceptably ‘pessimistic’ conclusions. The solution to such problems is to evaluate the probability of occurrence of each step in the hazard process. The paper reviews the bases of the new British Standards covering these hazards and presents an analysis of some of the probabilistic factors involved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
APPENDIX C: OPTIMUM ARRANGEMENT OF COMPONENTS IN CONSECUTIVE‐2‐OUT‐OF‐ N : F SYSTEMS APPENDIX A: GAMMA TABLE APPENDIX H: COMPUTER LISTING OF THE NEWTON–RAPHSON METHOD APPENDIX B: COMPUTER PROGRAM TO CALCULATE THE RELIABILITY OF A CONSECUTIVE‐ k ‐OUT‐OF‐ n : F SYSTEM SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1