老年人和青年人情绪调节的比较研究

IF 0.9 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.32598/sija.2021.16.3.3153.1
Narges Saeidi, M. Lotfi, M. Akbarian, A. Saeidi, A. Salehi
{"title":"老年人和青年人情绪调节的比较研究","authors":"Narges Saeidi, M. Lotfi, M. Akbarian, A. Saeidi, A. Salehi","doi":"10.32598/sija.2021.16.3.3153.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Healthy aging is a natural human right and emotion regulation is an important factor in improving mental health promotion in different developmental ages. This study aims to compare emotion regulation in older and younger adults. Methods & Materials: This is a causal-comparative study. The study population includes all older and younger adults in Tehran in 2019. Of these, 235 were selected using a convenience sampling method. They completed Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), Mentalized Affectivity Scale (MAS), and Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (ERO and ERS) questionnaires. Data analysis was performed using multivariate analysis of variance, independent t-test, and paired t-test in SPSS v. 20 software. Results: The scores of DERS (F= 17.08, P<0.001), ERQ (F= 16.07, P<0.001), and ERS (t = -12.2, P= 0.35) were significantly higher in older adults than younger adults, while there was no significant difference between them in MAS (t = -1.29, P= 0.198) and ERO (F= 0.256, P= 0.614) scores. Conclusion: The scores of DERS, ERS, and cognitive reappraisal subscale of ERQ are higher in older adults, but there is no significant difference between older and younger adults in the scores of MAS and ERO. Mental health professionals can take effective measures at the community level based on these findings to promote emotional health and psychological well-being of older people.","PeriodicalId":44423,"journal":{"name":"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Emotion Regulation of Older and Younger Adults\",\"authors\":\"Narges Saeidi, M. Lotfi, M. Akbarian, A. Saeidi, A. Salehi\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/sija.2021.16.3.3153.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Healthy aging is a natural human right and emotion regulation is an important factor in improving mental health promotion in different developmental ages. This study aims to compare emotion regulation in older and younger adults. Methods & Materials: This is a causal-comparative study. The study population includes all older and younger adults in Tehran in 2019. Of these, 235 were selected using a convenience sampling method. They completed Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), Mentalized Affectivity Scale (MAS), and Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (ERO and ERS) questionnaires. Data analysis was performed using multivariate analysis of variance, independent t-test, and paired t-test in SPSS v. 20 software. Results: The scores of DERS (F= 17.08, P<0.001), ERQ (F= 16.07, P<0.001), and ERS (t = -12.2, P= 0.35) were significantly higher in older adults than younger adults, while there was no significant difference between them in MAS (t = -1.29, P= 0.198) and ERO (F= 0.256, P= 0.614) scores. Conclusion: The scores of DERS, ERS, and cognitive reappraisal subscale of ERQ are higher in older adults, but there is no significant difference between older and younger adults in the scores of MAS and ERO. Mental health professionals can take effective measures at the community level based on these findings to promote emotional health and psychological well-being of older people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.2021.16.3.3153.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.2021.16.3.3153.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:健康老龄化是一项自然人权,情绪调节是促进不同发育年龄段心理健康的重要因素。本研究旨在比较老年人和年轻人的情绪调节能力。方法与材料:采用因果对比研究。研究人群包括2019年德黑兰的所有老年人和年轻人。其中,采用方便抽样法选取235个。完成情绪调节困难量表(DERS)、情绪调节问卷(ERQ)、心理情感量表(MAS)、他人与自我情绪调节问卷(ERO)和ERS问卷。数据分析采用SPSS v. 20软件进行多变量方差分析、独立t检验和配对t检验。结果:老年人的DERS评分(F= 17.08, P<0.001)、ERQ评分(F= 16.07, P<0.001)和ERS评分(t = -12.2, P= 0.35)显著高于年轻人,而MAS评分(t = -1.29, P= 0.198)和ERO评分(F= 0.256, P= 0.614)差异无统计学意义。结论:老年人在ERQ的DERS、ERS和认知重评分量表得分较高,而在MAS和ERO得分上,老年人与年轻人无显著差异。精神卫生专业人员可以根据这些发现在社区层面采取有效措施,促进老年人的情绪健康和心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study on Emotion Regulation of Older and Younger Adults
Objectives: Healthy aging is a natural human right and emotion regulation is an important factor in improving mental health promotion in different developmental ages. This study aims to compare emotion regulation in older and younger adults. Methods & Materials: This is a causal-comparative study. The study population includes all older and younger adults in Tehran in 2019. Of these, 235 were selected using a convenience sampling method. They completed Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), Mentalized Affectivity Scale (MAS), and Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (ERO and ERS) questionnaires. Data analysis was performed using multivariate analysis of variance, independent t-test, and paired t-test in SPSS v. 20 software. Results: The scores of DERS (F= 17.08, P<0.001), ERQ (F= 16.07, P<0.001), and ERS (t = -12.2, P= 0.35) were significantly higher in older adults than younger adults, while there was no significant difference between them in MAS (t = -1.29, P= 0.198) and ERO (F= 0.256, P= 0.614) scores. Conclusion: The scores of DERS, ERS, and cognitive reappraisal subscale of ERQ are higher in older adults, but there is no significant difference between older and younger adults in the scores of MAS and ERO. Mental health professionals can take effective measures at the community level based on these findings to promote emotional health and psychological well-being of older people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing
Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Non-pharmacological Intervention to Reduce Sleep Disturbance Among Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Exploring the Lived Experiences of Older Adults in Iran During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Study Effect of a Technology-based Exercise Program on Physical Fitness and Activities of Daily Living in the Elderly With Balance Impairment: A Clinical Trial Fear of Falling and its Relationship With Frailty in Older Adults Recognition Discriminability and Response Bias in the Shiraz Verbal Learning Test Among Older People With Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease, and Memory Normal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1