{"title":"配体与受体对接:α-凝乳胰蛋白酶的试验案例","authors":"Kent D. Stewart, James A. Bentley, Michael Cory","doi":"10.1016/0898-5529(90)90169-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Structures of 103 ligands previously tested as inhibitors of chymotrypsin catalysis were docked into the active site of the enzyme by use of the <span>dock</span> computer program. The goodness of fit was evaluated according to an approximate Lennard-Jones potential scoring routine. A statistical analysis indicated that <span>dock</span> correctly ranked the database when viewed in terms of a contingency table of four categories: true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives. Eight of the top ten scoring molecules in the computerized docking procedure had been previously reported to be effective competitive inhibitors of chymotrypsin. This agreement between the computer predictions and experimental observations was encouraging and suggests that the <span>dock</span> computer program may be useful in evaluating other receptors for potential binding ligands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101214,"journal":{"name":"Tetrahedron Computer Methodology","volume":"3 6","pages":"Pages 713-722"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0898-5529(90)90169-9","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DOCKing ligands into receptors: The test case of α-chymotrypsin\",\"authors\":\"Kent D. Stewart, James A. Bentley, Michael Cory\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0898-5529(90)90169-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Structures of 103 ligands previously tested as inhibitors of chymotrypsin catalysis were docked into the active site of the enzyme by use of the <span>dock</span> computer program. The goodness of fit was evaluated according to an approximate Lennard-Jones potential scoring routine. A statistical analysis indicated that <span>dock</span> correctly ranked the database when viewed in terms of a contingency table of four categories: true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives. Eight of the top ten scoring molecules in the computerized docking procedure had been previously reported to be effective competitive inhibitors of chymotrypsin. This agreement between the computer predictions and experimental observations was encouraging and suggests that the <span>dock</span> computer program may be useful in evaluating other receptors for potential binding ligands.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tetrahedron Computer Methodology\",\"volume\":\"3 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 713-722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0898-5529(90)90169-9\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tetrahedron Computer Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0898552990901699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tetrahedron Computer Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0898552990901699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
DOCKing ligands into receptors: The test case of α-chymotrypsin
Structures of 103 ligands previously tested as inhibitors of chymotrypsin catalysis were docked into the active site of the enzyme by use of the dock computer program. The goodness of fit was evaluated according to an approximate Lennard-Jones potential scoring routine. A statistical analysis indicated that dock correctly ranked the database when viewed in terms of a contingency table of four categories: true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives. Eight of the top ten scoring molecules in the computerized docking procedure had been previously reported to be effective competitive inhibitors of chymotrypsin. This agreement between the computer predictions and experimental observations was encouraging and suggests that the dock computer program may be useful in evaluating other receptors for potential binding ligands.