职前小学教师数学倾向的混合方法研究

Aybegum Albay, Hatice Çetin
{"title":"职前小学教师数学倾向的混合方法研究","authors":"Aybegum Albay, Hatice Çetin","doi":"10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp311-338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a comprehensive study aiming to examine pre-service primary school teachers’ (PPST) mathematical disposition levels in terms of various variables, and to explain the results thoroughly. It employed the explanatory sequential design among the mixed method research designs. The data were collected through Mathematics Dispositional Functions Inventory (MDFI) and semi-structured interviews. The participants consisted of 361 PPSTs in the quantitative phase, and six PPSTs in the qualitative phase. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed with descriptive analysis. The PPSTs’ mathematical disposition levels did not differ significantly in terms of grade level, high school type, area of education at high school and ability area variables; however, their scores in the attitude toward mathematics lesson factor of MDFI differed significantly in terms of area of education at high school and ability area variables. There were significant, positive, and low-level relationships between PPSTs’ mathematical disposition levels and their levels of mathematics learning experience in primary, middle and high schools, and their perception level of mathematics teaching efficacy. The PPSTs’ scores in attitude toward mathematics lesson factor related to ability area were consistent with their statements in the interviews. The quantitative analysis results regarding mathematics learning experience levels and mathematics teaching efficacy perception levels, defined as continuous variables, overlapped with the qualitative analysis results.","PeriodicalId":37090,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed method research study on pre-service primary school teachers’ mathematical disposition\",\"authors\":\"Aybegum Albay, Hatice Çetin\",\"doi\":\"10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp311-338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a comprehensive study aiming to examine pre-service primary school teachers’ (PPST) mathematical disposition levels in terms of various variables, and to explain the results thoroughly. It employed the explanatory sequential design among the mixed method research designs. The data were collected through Mathematics Dispositional Functions Inventory (MDFI) and semi-structured interviews. The participants consisted of 361 PPSTs in the quantitative phase, and six PPSTs in the qualitative phase. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed with descriptive analysis. The PPSTs’ mathematical disposition levels did not differ significantly in terms of grade level, high school type, area of education at high school and ability area variables; however, their scores in the attitude toward mathematics lesson factor of MDFI differed significantly in terms of area of education at high school and ability area variables. There were significant, positive, and low-level relationships between PPSTs’ mathematical disposition levels and their levels of mathematics learning experience in primary, middle and high schools, and their perception level of mathematics teaching efficacy. The PPSTs’ scores in attitude toward mathematics lesson factor related to ability area were consistent with their statements in the interviews. The quantitative analysis results regarding mathematics learning experience levels and mathematics teaching efficacy perception levels, defined as continuous variables, overlapped with the qualitative analysis results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp311-338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp311-338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨职前小学教师(PPST)的数学倾向水平,并从不同的变量来解释其结果。在混合方法研究设计中采用解释序列设计。通过数学气质功能量表(MDFI)和半结构化访谈收集数据。参与者包括定量阶段的361名PPSTs,定性阶段的6名PPSTs。定量资料采用描述性统计和推理统计进行分析,定性资料采用描述性分析。小学生数学倾向水平在年级、高中类型、高中教育区域和能力区域变量上差异不显著;然而,在高中教育领域和能力领域变量上,他们在MDFI数学课程态度因子上的得分存在显著差异。小学生数学倾向水平与小学、初中、高中数学学习经验水平、数学教学效能感知水平之间存在显著的正相关关系。学生对能力领域的数学课程因素的态度得分与他们在访谈中的陈述一致。数学学习经验水平和数学教学效能感知水平的定量分析结果被定义为连续变量,与定性分析结果重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A mixed method research study on pre-service primary school teachers’ mathematical disposition
This is a comprehensive study aiming to examine pre-service primary school teachers’ (PPST) mathematical disposition levels in terms of various variables, and to explain the results thoroughly. It employed the explanatory sequential design among the mixed method research designs. The data were collected through Mathematics Dispositional Functions Inventory (MDFI) and semi-structured interviews. The participants consisted of 361 PPSTs in the quantitative phase, and six PPSTs in the qualitative phase. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed with descriptive analysis. The PPSTs’ mathematical disposition levels did not differ significantly in terms of grade level, high school type, area of education at high school and ability area variables; however, their scores in the attitude toward mathematics lesson factor of MDFI differed significantly in terms of area of education at high school and ability area variables. There were significant, positive, and low-level relationships between PPSTs’ mathematical disposition levels and their levels of mathematics learning experience in primary, middle and high schools, and their perception level of mathematics teaching efficacy. The PPSTs’ scores in attitude toward mathematics lesson factor related to ability area were consistent with their statements in the interviews. The quantitative analysis results regarding mathematics learning experience levels and mathematics teaching efficacy perception levels, defined as continuous variables, overlapped with the qualitative analysis results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal on Mathematics Education
Journal on Mathematics Education Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
What explains early numeracy achievement: A comparison of South Africa and China Exploring default-interventionist interaction of thinking activity types on probability problem-solving Mathematics learning orientation: Mathematical creative thinking ability or creative disposition? Promoting socioeconomic equity through automatic formative assessment Aligning numeracy task design with SDG goals: Nutrition facts as a context for prospective mathematics teachers' problem posing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1