教育聊天机器人的反馈如何影响人类的注意力?

IF 3.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI:10.58459/rptel.2024.19007
Francesca Sylvester, N. Le, S. Soekadar
{"title":"教育聊天机器人的反馈如何影响人类的注意力?","authors":"Francesca Sylvester, N. Le, S. Soekadar","doi":"10.58459/rptel.2024.19007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educational chatbots have been shown to be useful assistants in computer-supported learning settings. However, how does feedback of an educational chatbot impact on the learner’s attention? Thus, this paper proposes a study to measure changes in human attention when learning by using an educational chatbot Liza that is intended to improve human reasoning ability. In total, 18 participants participated in the study and had a conversation with Liza. During the interaction with Liza, the attention of the study participants was measured using a mobile electroencephalogram (EEG) device. Three findings have been determined based on statistics methods. First, it was found that there was a significant attention effect occurring in 54% of the times, after the educational chatbot showed feedback and the attention measurement took place over the length of a task. Second, when differentiating the type of feedback, positive feedback had a significant effect in 71 of these 137 cases (51.82%) and negative feedback had a significant effect in 66 of the 137 cases (48.18%). Third, statistical results showed that there was no significant difference in attention at the significant level of 0.05 during the 10 seconds before, and 10 seconds after positive feedback is received. Similar is the case for negative feedback.","PeriodicalId":37055,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"39 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can an educational chatbot's feedback influence human attention?\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Sylvester, N. Le, S. Soekadar\",\"doi\":\"10.58459/rptel.2024.19007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Educational chatbots have been shown to be useful assistants in computer-supported learning settings. However, how does feedback of an educational chatbot impact on the learner’s attention? Thus, this paper proposes a study to measure changes in human attention when learning by using an educational chatbot Liza that is intended to improve human reasoning ability. In total, 18 participants participated in the study and had a conversation with Liza. During the interaction with Liza, the attention of the study participants was measured using a mobile electroencephalogram (EEG) device. Three findings have been determined based on statistics methods. First, it was found that there was a significant attention effect occurring in 54% of the times, after the educational chatbot showed feedback and the attention measurement took place over the length of a task. Second, when differentiating the type of feedback, positive feedback had a significant effect in 71 of these 137 cases (51.82%) and negative feedback had a significant effect in 66 of the 137 cases (48.18%). Third, statistical results showed that there was no significant difference in attention at the significant level of 0.05 during the 10 seconds before, and 10 seconds after positive feedback is received. Similar is the case for negative feedback.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育聊天机器人已被证明在计算机支持的学习环境中是有用的助手。然而,教育聊天机器人的反馈如何影响学习者的注意力?因此,本文提出了一项研究,通过使用旨在提高人类推理能力的教育聊天机器人Liza来测量人类在学习时注意力的变化。总共有18名参与者参与了这项研究,并与Liza进行了交谈。在与Liza的互动过程中,研究参与者的注意力使用移动脑电图(EEG)设备进行测量。根据统计方法确定了三个发现。首先,研究发现,在教育聊天机器人显示反馈后,在54%的情况下出现了显著的注意力效应,并且注意力测量发生在任务的整个过程中。其次,在区分反馈类型时,137例中,正反馈有71例(51.82%)具有显著效果,负反馈有66例(48.18%)具有显著效果。第三,统计结果显示,在收到正反馈前10秒和收到正反馈后10秒,两组学生的注意力在0.05的显著水平上无显著差异。负面反馈也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How can an educational chatbot's feedback influence human attention?
Educational chatbots have been shown to be useful assistants in computer-supported learning settings. However, how does feedback of an educational chatbot impact on the learner’s attention? Thus, this paper proposes a study to measure changes in human attention when learning by using an educational chatbot Liza that is intended to improve human reasoning ability. In total, 18 participants participated in the study and had a conversation with Liza. During the interaction with Liza, the attention of the study participants was measured using a mobile electroencephalogram (EEG) device. Three findings have been determined based on statistics methods. First, it was found that there was a significant attention effect occurring in 54% of the times, after the educational chatbot showed feedback and the attention measurement took place over the length of a task. Second, when differentiating the type of feedback, positive feedback had a significant effect in 71 of these 137 cases (51.82%) and negative feedback had a significant effect in 66 of the 137 cases (48.18%). Third, statistical results showed that there was no significant difference in attention at the significant level of 0.05 during the 10 seconds before, and 10 seconds after positive feedback is received. Similar is the case for negative feedback.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
An investigation of students and teachers’ new media literacy: the contributing characteristics with the moderator role of gender Classroom implementation of an auxiliary problem presentation system for mechanics adapted to learners’ errors Correlation among game addiction, achievement emotion, and learning motivation: A study of Indonesian youth in the context of e-learning system The influence of gender on STEM career choice: A partial least squares analysis “I felt like I was on campus” creating a situated learning environment through Instagram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1