最小的工具,最大的肉:用旧石器时代早期的石器技术屠宰大象脚和制作大象骨头工具的试点实验

IF 1.8 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Ethnoarchaeology Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/19442890.2020.1864877
B. Starkovich, Patrick Cuthbertson, K. Kitagawa, Nicholas Thompson, G. Konidaris, Veerle Rots, Susanne Münzel, D. Giusti, Viola C. Schmid, Angel Blanco-Lapaz, Christian Lepers, Vangelis Tourloukis
{"title":"最小的工具,最大的肉:用旧石器时代早期的石器技术屠宰大象脚和制作大象骨头工具的试点实验","authors":"B. Starkovich, Patrick Cuthbertson, K. Kitagawa, Nicholas Thompson, G. Konidaris, Veerle Rots, Susanne Münzel, D. Giusti, Viola C. Schmid, Angel Blanco-Lapaz, Christian Lepers, Vangelis Tourloukis","doi":"10.1080/19442890.2020.1864877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article presents a pilot experiment conducted to better understand how Middle Pleistocene hominins might have processed and exploited elephants using simple stone and bone tools. The experiment was conducted in three phases: (1) production of small, flake-based stone tools, (2) butchery of the lower hind-leg of an Indian elephant, and (3) manufacture of bone tools from the tibia. The experiment shows it is possible to cut through elephant skin in under four minutes using small chipped-stone flakes; disarticulating the astragalus from the tibia is relatively easy, whereas disarticulating the astragalus from the other tarsals is difficult; breaking open an elephant tibia is possible in two minutes; the tibia of the elephant used in the experiment lacked a hollow marrow cavity; extraction of the large fatty cushion encased in the metatarsals and phalanges required several hours; and elephant bone tools are useful for retouching lithic materials of differing quality.","PeriodicalId":42668,"journal":{"name":"Ethnoarchaeology","volume":"10 1","pages":"118 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal Tools, Maximum Meat: A Pilot Experiment to Butcher an Elephant Foot and Make Elephant Bone Tools Using Lower Paleolithic Stone Tool Technology\",\"authors\":\"B. Starkovich, Patrick Cuthbertson, K. Kitagawa, Nicholas Thompson, G. Konidaris, Veerle Rots, Susanne Münzel, D. Giusti, Viola C. Schmid, Angel Blanco-Lapaz, Christian Lepers, Vangelis Tourloukis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19442890.2020.1864877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article presents a pilot experiment conducted to better understand how Middle Pleistocene hominins might have processed and exploited elephants using simple stone and bone tools. The experiment was conducted in three phases: (1) production of small, flake-based stone tools, (2) butchery of the lower hind-leg of an Indian elephant, and (3) manufacture of bone tools from the tibia. The experiment shows it is possible to cut through elephant skin in under four minutes using small chipped-stone flakes; disarticulating the astragalus from the tibia is relatively easy, whereas disarticulating the astragalus from the other tarsals is difficult; breaking open an elephant tibia is possible in two minutes; the tibia of the elephant used in the experiment lacked a hollow marrow cavity; extraction of the large fatty cushion encased in the metatarsals and phalanges required several hours; and elephant bone tools are useful for retouching lithic materials of differing quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnoarchaeology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"118 - 147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnoarchaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19442890.2020.1864877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnoarchaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19442890.2020.1864877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

为了更好地了解中更新世人类如何使用简单的石器和骨工具加工和利用大象,本文进行了一项试点实验。实验分三个阶段进行:(1)生产小型的、以薄片为基础的石器;(2)屠宰一头印度象的后腿下部;(3)用胫骨制造骨工具。实验表明,用小的碎石片在四分钟内切开大象的皮肤是可能的;从胫骨上分离黄芪相对容易,而从其他跗骨上分离黄芪则比较困难;在两分钟内就可以打开大象的胫骨;实验中使用的大象胫骨缺少一个中空的骨髓腔;取出包裹在跖骨和指骨中的大脂肪垫需要几个小时;象骨工具对于修饰不同质量的石器材料很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimal Tools, Maximum Meat: A Pilot Experiment to Butcher an Elephant Foot and Make Elephant Bone Tools Using Lower Paleolithic Stone Tool Technology
ABSTRACT This article presents a pilot experiment conducted to better understand how Middle Pleistocene hominins might have processed and exploited elephants using simple stone and bone tools. The experiment was conducted in three phases: (1) production of small, flake-based stone tools, (2) butchery of the lower hind-leg of an Indian elephant, and (3) manufacture of bone tools from the tibia. The experiment shows it is possible to cut through elephant skin in under four minutes using small chipped-stone flakes; disarticulating the astragalus from the tibia is relatively easy, whereas disarticulating the astragalus from the other tarsals is difficult; breaking open an elephant tibia is possible in two minutes; the tibia of the elephant used in the experiment lacked a hollow marrow cavity; extraction of the large fatty cushion encased in the metatarsals and phalanges required several hours; and elephant bone tools are useful for retouching lithic materials of differing quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnoarchaeology
Ethnoarchaeology ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Ethnoarchaeology, a cross-cultural peer-reviewed journal, focuses on the present position, impact of, and future prospects of ethnoarchaeological and experimental studies approaches to anthropological research. The primary goal of this journal is to provide practitioners with an intellectual platform to showcase and appraise current research and theoretical and methodological directions for the 21st century. Although there has been an exponential increase in ethnoarchaeological and experimental research in the past thirty years, there is little that unifies or defines our subdiscipline. Ethnoarchaeology addresses this need, exploring what distinguishes ethnoarchaeological and experimental approaches, what methods connect practitioners, and what unique suite of research attributes we contribute to the better understanding of the human condition. In addition to research articles, the journal publishes book and other media reviews, periodic theme issues, and position statements by noted scholars.
期刊最新文献
Living Seaward: Maritime Cosmology and the Contemporary Significance of Natar Fampompar, a Stone Boat Ceremonial Structure in the Village of Sangliat Dol, Tanimbar Islands Castillo Decorated Ceramics as Boundary Objects: A Technological Reappraisal of the North Coast Tradition from Peru During the Early Intermediate Period Community Technical Identity among Potters in the Talina Valley, South Andean Bolivia “Brewing Beer and Breaking Bread: Integrating Ethnoarchaeological and Archaeological Research on Food and Culinary Practices, Thematic Section, Part II” A Taste for Sweet: Ethnoarchaeological Insights on Plant-Based Sweeteners of Prehistoric Southeastern Europe with Special Emphasis on Wild Pear Syrup
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1