2019冠状病毒病(Covid-19)的性别和性别生物社会心理差异:男性有更多的生物学问题,但女性有更多的长期严重社会心理后果,对人口的影响更大

R. Aburabia, T. Hener, A. Biton, Y. Abukrat, T. Hendel
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病(Covid-19)的性别和性别生物社会心理差异:男性有更多的生物学问题,但女性有更多的长期严重社会心理后果,对人口的影响更大","authors":"R. Aburabia, T. Hener, A. Biton, Y. Abukrat, T. Hendel","doi":"10.35248/2167-0420.20.9.487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Induced abortion or Termination of Pregnancy (TOP) is still a controversial issue in all societies because of moral, ethical, legal, emotional and religious questions. The decision to abort is made primarily by mother, couple and family. Studies indicate that abortion can create physical, social and psychological problems both for women and for medical staff. Decisions are influenced by the women's personal values and religious factors thus potentially making it more complicated emotionally, physically and socially. Aim of the study: To assess attitudes and differences between ultra-orthodox and secular women determining TOP, depending on the cause of the abortion. Methods and procedure: One hundred ninety-six Jewish women participated in a cross-section study, conducted in 2018. They were evaluated by a questionnaire comprised of two parts. a) Socio-demographic characteristics, b) Attitudes regarding TOP. Data was collected via Google Forms. Data were analyzed by using SPSS, version 25. Results: Orthodox women were found less liberal about abortion than secular women were. Secular women agreed to perform abortions in cases of fetal malformation, albinism, economic distress, unplanned pregnancy, and pregnancy interrupted career goals. There were no differences between the two groups to abort the pregnancy because of fetal gender. Conclusions: Judaism opposes abortion for both religious and moral reasons. Many religious leaders (rabbis) prohibit abortion in almost every situation. However, there are cases in which they will give permission to perform, mostly if the pregnancy poses a danger to the woman's life. In contrast to this approach, there are various feminist and human rights organizations in Israel, which support the choice of women regarding their bodies.","PeriodicalId":93471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health care and management","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex and Gender Bio-psychosocial Differences in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Men have more Biological Problems, but Women Suffer more Long Term Serious Psychosocial Consequences and with more Implications for Population\",\"authors\":\"R. Aburabia, T. Hener, A. Biton, Y. Abukrat, T. Hendel\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2167-0420.20.9.487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Induced abortion or Termination of Pregnancy (TOP) is still a controversial issue in all societies because of moral, ethical, legal, emotional and religious questions. The decision to abort is made primarily by mother, couple and family. Studies indicate that abortion can create physical, social and psychological problems both for women and for medical staff. Decisions are influenced by the women's personal values and religious factors thus potentially making it more complicated emotionally, physically and socially. Aim of the study: To assess attitudes and differences between ultra-orthodox and secular women determining TOP, depending on the cause of the abortion. Methods and procedure: One hundred ninety-six Jewish women participated in a cross-section study, conducted in 2018. They were evaluated by a questionnaire comprised of two parts. a) Socio-demographic characteristics, b) Attitudes regarding TOP. Data was collected via Google Forms. Data were analyzed by using SPSS, version 25. Results: Orthodox women were found less liberal about abortion than secular women were. Secular women agreed to perform abortions in cases of fetal malformation, albinism, economic distress, unplanned pregnancy, and pregnancy interrupted career goals. There were no differences between the two groups to abort the pregnancy because of fetal gender. Conclusions: Judaism opposes abortion for both religious and moral reasons. Many religious leaders (rabbis) prohibit abortion in almost every situation. However, there are cases in which they will give permission to perform, mostly if the pregnancy poses a danger to the woman's life. In contrast to this approach, there are various feminist and human rights organizations in Israel, which support the choice of women regarding their bodies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health care and management\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health care and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0420.20.9.487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health care and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0420.20.9.487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:人工流产或终止妊娠(TOP)在所有社会中仍然是一个有争议的问题,因为道德,伦理,法律,情感和宗教问题。堕胎的决定主要是由母亲、夫妇和家庭做出的。研究表明,堕胎会给妇女和医务人员造成身体、社会和心理问题。妇女的决定受到个人价值观和宗教因素的影响,因此可能使其在情感、身体和社会上更加复杂。研究的目的:评估极端正统和世俗妇女在决定TOP时的态度和差异,这取决于堕胎的原因。方法和程序:196名犹太妇女参加了2018年进行的一项横断面研究。他们通过一份由两部分组成的问卷进行评估。a)社会人口特征;b)对TOP的态度。数据是通过谷歌表格收集的。数据分析采用SPSS,版本25。结果:东正教妇女对堕胎的态度比世俗妇女更不自由。世俗女性同意在胎儿畸形、白化病、经济困难、意外怀孕和怀孕中断职业目标的情况下进行堕胎。两组因胎儿性别而流产的情况无差异。结论:犹太教出于宗教和道德原因反对堕胎。许多宗教领袖(拉比)几乎在任何情况下都禁止堕胎。然而,在某些情况下,他们会允许进行手术,主要是在怀孕对妇女的生命构成危险的情况下。与这种做法相反,以色列有各种女权主义和人权组织,它们支持妇女对自己身体的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex and Gender Bio-psychosocial Differences in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Men have more Biological Problems, but Women Suffer more Long Term Serious Psychosocial Consequences and with more Implications for Population
Background: Induced abortion or Termination of Pregnancy (TOP) is still a controversial issue in all societies because of moral, ethical, legal, emotional and religious questions. The decision to abort is made primarily by mother, couple and family. Studies indicate that abortion can create physical, social and psychological problems both for women and for medical staff. Decisions are influenced by the women's personal values and religious factors thus potentially making it more complicated emotionally, physically and socially. Aim of the study: To assess attitudes and differences between ultra-orthodox and secular women determining TOP, depending on the cause of the abortion. Methods and procedure: One hundred ninety-six Jewish women participated in a cross-section study, conducted in 2018. They were evaluated by a questionnaire comprised of two parts. a) Socio-demographic characteristics, b) Attitudes regarding TOP. Data was collected via Google Forms. Data were analyzed by using SPSS, version 25. Results: Orthodox women were found less liberal about abortion than secular women were. Secular women agreed to perform abortions in cases of fetal malformation, albinism, economic distress, unplanned pregnancy, and pregnancy interrupted career goals. There were no differences between the two groups to abort the pregnancy because of fetal gender. Conclusions: Judaism opposes abortion for both religious and moral reasons. Many religious leaders (rabbis) prohibit abortion in almost every situation. However, there are cases in which they will give permission to perform, mostly if the pregnancy poses a danger to the woman's life. In contrast to this approach, there are various feminist and human rights organizations in Israel, which support the choice of women regarding their bodies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exclusive breastfeeding practice and its associated factors among mothers with infants aged less than six months in Nono, Western Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study The Intricate Interactions between Maternal Smoking and Drinking During Pregnancy and Birthweight Z-Scores of Preterm Births. Utilization of Long Acting and Permanent Contraceptive Methods and Associated Factors among Married Women of Reproductive Age Group in Goba Town, Southeast Ethiopia Trend Analysis of Malaria Prevalence in East Wollega Zone, Oromia Regional State, Western Ethiopia, 2020: A Retrospective Study Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Infection Prevention among Health Care Workers in Public Health Facilities in West Guji Zone, Oromia,Ethiopia, 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1