{"title":"高通量测序分析在乳腺癌易感基因非brca致病性种系变异诊断中的重要性","authors":"Akif Ayaz","doi":"10.14744/ejmo.2022.88057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"to out the importance of the diagnosis of breast by the predisposition genes except BRCA1/2 with multigene testing. Methods: In this study, 232 non-BRCA cases with BC and/or BC family history (FH) were analyzed using the next-gen-eration sequencing method. Twenty-two different pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were determined in 24 (10.34%) of cases, and these variants were detected in the CHEK2 (7/24, 29.1%), ATM (5/24, 20.8%), MUTYH (3/24, 12.5%), BLM (2/24, 8.3%), WRN 8.3%), TP53 (1/24, 4.1%), BRIP1 (1/24, 4.1%), MSH2 (1/24, 4.1%), NBN (1/24, 4.1%), and PTEN (1/24, 4.1%) genes including three novel variants which were identified in the BLM, ATM , and MSH2 (3/22, 13.6%) genes. Fourteen of 24 (58.3%) cases had BC diagnosis, and 10 of 24 (41.6%) cases had a FH of BC. Conclusion: Among non-BRCA BC and/or BC FH cases, cancer susceptibility gene frequency was 10.34% in this study. CHEK2 and ATM genes had relatively high mutation rates. Abstract","PeriodicalId":11831,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of Diagnosis in Breast Cancer with Non-BRCA Pathogenic Germline Variants of Cancer Susceptibility Genes using High-Throughput Sequencing Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Akif Ayaz\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/ejmo.2022.88057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"to out the importance of the diagnosis of breast by the predisposition genes except BRCA1/2 with multigene testing. Methods: In this study, 232 non-BRCA cases with BC and/or BC family history (FH) were analyzed using the next-gen-eration sequencing method. Twenty-two different pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were determined in 24 (10.34%) of cases, and these variants were detected in the CHEK2 (7/24, 29.1%), ATM (5/24, 20.8%), MUTYH (3/24, 12.5%), BLM (2/24, 8.3%), WRN 8.3%), TP53 (1/24, 4.1%), BRIP1 (1/24, 4.1%), MSH2 (1/24, 4.1%), NBN (1/24, 4.1%), and PTEN (1/24, 4.1%) genes including three novel variants which were identified in the BLM, ATM , and MSH2 (3/22, 13.6%) genes. Fourteen of 24 (58.3%) cases had BC diagnosis, and 10 of 24 (41.6%) cases had a FH of BC. Conclusion: Among non-BRCA BC and/or BC FH cases, cancer susceptibility gene frequency was 10.34% in this study. CHEK2 and ATM genes had relatively high mutation rates. Abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":11831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2022.88057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2022.88057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Importance of Diagnosis in Breast Cancer with Non-BRCA Pathogenic Germline Variants of Cancer Susceptibility Genes using High-Throughput Sequencing Analysis
to out the importance of the diagnosis of breast by the predisposition genes except BRCA1/2 with multigene testing. Methods: In this study, 232 non-BRCA cases with BC and/or BC family history (FH) were analyzed using the next-gen-eration sequencing method. Twenty-two different pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were determined in 24 (10.34%) of cases, and these variants were detected in the CHEK2 (7/24, 29.1%), ATM (5/24, 20.8%), MUTYH (3/24, 12.5%), BLM (2/24, 8.3%), WRN 8.3%), TP53 (1/24, 4.1%), BRIP1 (1/24, 4.1%), MSH2 (1/24, 4.1%), NBN (1/24, 4.1%), and PTEN (1/24, 4.1%) genes including three novel variants which were identified in the BLM, ATM , and MSH2 (3/22, 13.6%) genes. Fourteen of 24 (58.3%) cases had BC diagnosis, and 10 of 24 (41.6%) cases had a FH of BC. Conclusion: Among non-BRCA BC and/or BC FH cases, cancer susceptibility gene frequency was 10.34% in this study. CHEK2 and ATM genes had relatively high mutation rates. Abstract