健壮性是否存在限制?探索再生经济学的工具,以实现向循环欧盟27国的平衡过渡

Filippos K. Zisopoulos , Dominika A. Teigiserova , Daan Schraven , Martin de Jong , Xin Tong , Robert E. Ulanowicz
{"title":"健壮性是否存在限制?探索再生经济学的工具,以实现向循环欧盟27国的平衡过渡","authors":"Filippos K. Zisopoulos ,&nbsp;Dominika A. Teigiserova ,&nbsp;Daan Schraven ,&nbsp;Martin de Jong ,&nbsp;Xin Tong ,&nbsp;Robert E. Ulanowicz","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2022.100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The first step for transforming the current linear and degenerative socio-economic systems into ones that are circular and regenerative is to understand how they grow and develop. Here, we explore whether there are limits to robustness of a socio-economic system as the result of a linear metabolic structure, and how those limits could theoretically be affected by its transition to a circular economy. First, we study how the circular use of materials and the economic openness of the EU27 would affect the value of its circularity rate (as defined by Eurostat), theoretically. Then, given that the circularity rate does not capture regenerative aspects, we develop a conceptual framework based on regenerative economics and on indicators from ascendency analysis and ecological network analysis. We use this framework to assess a theoretical future case where the EU27 manages to successfully transition to a CE within its given linear material flow metabolism. The results show that there are limits to robustness, and which do not necessarily correspond to a maximum circularity rate. None of the 45 scenarios assessed can theoretically lead to the maximum robustness observed in natural ecosystems, including those which maximize the circularity rate. Interestingly, the highest possible robustness value is obtained at a circularity rate of about 33% as a combination of a material recovery rate of 30% and of a material export rate of 10%. Scenarios of higher circularity rate (as the result of higher export rates and/or higher material recovery rates) seem to lead to brittle networks. Other indicators from regenerative economics are also discussed. Furthermore, the results show that even if substantial steps are taken by the EU27 towards a circular economy, 100% circularity rate seems to be unlikely. This analysis highlights that the use of tools from regenerative economics can assist policy makers and researchers to account for and to monitor network properties such as those of resilience and robustness, during strategic planning activities for a transition to a regenerative circular economy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791622000124/pdfft?md5=a2dcf47fbf5e4c8f760a2237454c942b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666791622000124-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are there limits to robustness? Exploring tools from regenerative economics for a balanced transition towards a circular EU27\",\"authors\":\"Filippos K. Zisopoulos ,&nbsp;Dominika A. Teigiserova ,&nbsp;Daan Schraven ,&nbsp;Martin de Jong ,&nbsp;Xin Tong ,&nbsp;Robert E. Ulanowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clpl.2022.100014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The first step for transforming the current linear and degenerative socio-economic systems into ones that are circular and regenerative is to understand how they grow and develop. Here, we explore whether there are limits to robustness of a socio-economic system as the result of a linear metabolic structure, and how those limits could theoretically be affected by its transition to a circular economy. First, we study how the circular use of materials and the economic openness of the EU27 would affect the value of its circularity rate (as defined by Eurostat), theoretically. Then, given that the circularity rate does not capture regenerative aspects, we develop a conceptual framework based on regenerative economics and on indicators from ascendency analysis and ecological network analysis. We use this framework to assess a theoretical future case where the EU27 manages to successfully transition to a CE within its given linear material flow metabolism. The results show that there are limits to robustness, and which do not necessarily correspond to a maximum circularity rate. None of the 45 scenarios assessed can theoretically lead to the maximum robustness observed in natural ecosystems, including those which maximize the circularity rate. Interestingly, the highest possible robustness value is obtained at a circularity rate of about 33% as a combination of a material recovery rate of 30% and of a material export rate of 10%. Scenarios of higher circularity rate (as the result of higher export rates and/or higher material recovery rates) seem to lead to brittle networks. Other indicators from regenerative economics are also discussed. Furthermore, the results show that even if substantial steps are taken by the EU27 towards a circular economy, 100% circularity rate seems to be unlikely. This analysis highlights that the use of tools from regenerative economics can assist policy makers and researchers to account for and to monitor network properties such as those of resilience and robustness, during strategic planning activities for a transition to a regenerative circular economy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Production Letters\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791622000124/pdfft?md5=a2dcf47fbf5e4c8f760a2237454c942b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666791622000124-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Production Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791622000124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791622000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

将当前线性和退化的社会经济系统转变为循环和再生的社会经济系统的第一步是了解它们是如何生长和发展的。在这里,我们探讨了线性代谢结构是否对社会经济系统的稳健性有限制,以及这些限制在理论上如何受到其向循环经济过渡的影响。首先,我们从理论上研究了材料的循环使用和欧盟27国的经济开放度如何影响其循环率(由欧盟统计局定义)的价值。然后,考虑到循环率没有捕捉到再生方面,我们基于再生经济学和优势分析和生态网络分析的指标开发了一个概念框架。我们使用这个框架来评估一个理论上的未来案例,其中欧盟27国成功地在其给定的线性物质流代谢中过渡到CE。结果表明,鲁棒性是有限度的,这并不一定对应于最大循环率。所评估的45种情景中,没有一种能在理论上导致在自然生态系统中观察到的最大稳健性,包括那些使循环率最大化的情景。有趣的是,在材料回收率为30%和材料出口率为10%的情况下,在循环率约为33%的情况下,获得了最高可能的稳健性值。较高的循环率(由于较高的出口率和/或较高的材料回收率)似乎会导致脆性网络。本文还讨论了再生经济的其他指标。此外,研究结果表明,即使欧盟27国朝着循环经济迈出了实质性的步伐,100%的循环率似乎也不太可能实现。该分析强调,在向可再生循环经济过渡的战略规划活动中,使用再生经济学的工具可以帮助政策制定者和研究人员考虑和监测网络特性,如弹性和稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are there limits to robustness? Exploring tools from regenerative economics for a balanced transition towards a circular EU27

The first step for transforming the current linear and degenerative socio-economic systems into ones that are circular and regenerative is to understand how they grow and develop. Here, we explore whether there are limits to robustness of a socio-economic system as the result of a linear metabolic structure, and how those limits could theoretically be affected by its transition to a circular economy. First, we study how the circular use of materials and the economic openness of the EU27 would affect the value of its circularity rate (as defined by Eurostat), theoretically. Then, given that the circularity rate does not capture regenerative aspects, we develop a conceptual framework based on regenerative economics and on indicators from ascendency analysis and ecological network analysis. We use this framework to assess a theoretical future case where the EU27 manages to successfully transition to a CE within its given linear material flow metabolism. The results show that there are limits to robustness, and which do not necessarily correspond to a maximum circularity rate. None of the 45 scenarios assessed can theoretically lead to the maximum robustness observed in natural ecosystems, including those which maximize the circularity rate. Interestingly, the highest possible robustness value is obtained at a circularity rate of about 33% as a combination of a material recovery rate of 30% and of a material export rate of 10%. Scenarios of higher circularity rate (as the result of higher export rates and/or higher material recovery rates) seem to lead to brittle networks. Other indicators from regenerative economics are also discussed. Furthermore, the results show that even if substantial steps are taken by the EU27 towards a circular economy, 100% circularity rate seems to be unlikely. This analysis highlights that the use of tools from regenerative economics can assist policy makers and researchers to account for and to monitor network properties such as those of resilience and robustness, during strategic planning activities for a transition to a regenerative circular economy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crossovers between Sustainability Transitions Research and Social Practice Theory: A Systematic Literature Review Incorporating creative problem-solving skills to foster sustainability among graduate students in education management Advancing product service systems - Life cycle assessment: Robust method for sustainability assessment A framework for product development based on recycled plastic from pesticide packaging: A study of short supply chains from the perspective of circular economy Emerging trends of environmental social and governance (ESG) disclosure research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1