红树莓花青素提取工艺及其清除自由基能力研究

supYinghui Liu, supXuemei Zhang, supHan Li, supShuang Gao, supLixia Wang, supYiling Tian
{"title":"红树莓花青素提取工艺及其清除自由基能力研究","authors":"supYinghui Liu, supXuemei Zhang, supHan Li, supShuang Gao, supLixia Wang, supYiling Tian","doi":"10.19026/AJFST.14.5978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of study was to find the best technology for extracting anthocyanins from the red respberry. Different technologies for the preliminary extraction of anthocyanins from red raspberry fruit as the raw material, including Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction (UAE) and Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE), were studied. The effects of extraction time, extraction temperature, solvent-material ratio and other factors on the anthocyanin yield were investigated. The center point combination experiment design was used to analyze the various extraction conditions, determine significance and interactions between various factors and optimize the extraction parameters. The final extraction rate obtained using MAE (0.0598 mg/g) was about 1.5-fold higher than that using UAE (0.0412 mg/g). The free radical scavenging activity of the extracts was examined in different in-vitro antioxidant experiments in comparison with ascorbic acid (Vc) as the control. In these DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), hydroxyl and ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) free radical scavenging experiments, MAE and UAE extracts showed free radical scavenging activities 2.8 and 1.5-fold, 4.7 and 3-fold and 1.2 and 1-fold higher, respectively, than those of the Vc control. Furthermore, the scavenging activities of red raspberry anthocyanin extracts against the different free radicals increased in the order hydroxyl > ABTS > DPPH, while the antioxidant capacity of the MAE extract was higher than that of the UAE extract.","PeriodicalId":7316,"journal":{"name":"Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technologies for Extracting Anthocyanins from the Red Raspberry and their Free Radical Scavenging Ability\",\"authors\":\"supYinghui Liu, supXuemei Zhang, supHan Li, supShuang Gao, supLixia Wang, supYiling Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.19026/AJFST.14.5978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aims of study was to find the best technology for extracting anthocyanins from the red respberry. Different technologies for the preliminary extraction of anthocyanins from red raspberry fruit as the raw material, including Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction (UAE) and Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE), were studied. The effects of extraction time, extraction temperature, solvent-material ratio and other factors on the anthocyanin yield were investigated. The center point combination experiment design was used to analyze the various extraction conditions, determine significance and interactions between various factors and optimize the extraction parameters. The final extraction rate obtained using MAE (0.0598 mg/g) was about 1.5-fold higher than that using UAE (0.0412 mg/g). The free radical scavenging activity of the extracts was examined in different in-vitro antioxidant experiments in comparison with ascorbic acid (Vc) as the control. In these DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), hydroxyl and ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) free radical scavenging experiments, MAE and UAE extracts showed free radical scavenging activities 2.8 and 1.5-fold, 4.7 and 3-fold and 1.2 and 1-fold higher, respectively, than those of the Vc control. Furthermore, the scavenging activities of red raspberry anthocyanin extracts against the different free radicals increased in the order hydroxyl > ABTS > DPPH, while the antioxidant capacity of the MAE extract was higher than that of the UAE extract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19026/AJFST.14.5978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19026/AJFST.14.5978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是寻找从红莓中提取花青素的最佳工艺。以红覆盆子为原料,研究了超声辅助提取(UAE)和微波辅助提取(MAE)两种不同的初步提取工艺。考察了提取时间、提取温度、料液比等因素对花青素得率的影响。采用中心点组合试验设计,分析各种提取条件,确定各因素之间的显著性及相互作用,优化提取参数。MAE的最终提取率(0.0598 mg/g)比UAE的最终提取率(0.0412 mg/g)高1.5倍左右。以抗坏血酸(Vc)为对照,通过不同的体外抗氧化实验考察其自由基清除能力。在DPPH(2,2-二苯基-1-吡啶肼基)、羟基和ABTS(2,2'-氮基-双(3-乙基苯并噻唑-6-磺酸))自由基清除实验中,MAE和UAE提取物的自由基清除能力分别比Vc对照组高2.8倍和1.5倍、4.7倍和3倍和1.2倍和1倍。此外,红莓花青素提取物对不同自由基的清除能力在羟基> ABTS > DPPH顺序上均有增强,且MAE提取物的抗氧化能力高于UAE提取物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technologies for Extracting Anthocyanins from the Red Raspberry and their Free Radical Scavenging Ability
The aims of study was to find the best technology for extracting anthocyanins from the red respberry. Different technologies for the preliminary extraction of anthocyanins from red raspberry fruit as the raw material, including Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction (UAE) and Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE), were studied. The effects of extraction time, extraction temperature, solvent-material ratio and other factors on the anthocyanin yield were investigated. The center point combination experiment design was used to analyze the various extraction conditions, determine significance and interactions between various factors and optimize the extraction parameters. The final extraction rate obtained using MAE (0.0598 mg/g) was about 1.5-fold higher than that using UAE (0.0412 mg/g). The free radical scavenging activity of the extracts was examined in different in-vitro antioxidant experiments in comparison with ascorbic acid (Vc) as the control. In these DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), hydroxyl and ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) free radical scavenging experiments, MAE and UAE extracts showed free radical scavenging activities 2.8 and 1.5-fold, 4.7 and 3-fold and 1.2 and 1-fold higher, respectively, than those of the Vc control. Furthermore, the scavenging activities of red raspberry anthocyanin extracts against the different free radicals increased in the order hydroxyl > ABTS > DPPH, while the antioxidant capacity of the MAE extract was higher than that of the UAE extract.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Increased Production of Coenzyme $Q_{10}$ from Genetic Engineered Rhodobacter sphaeroides Overexpressing UbiG Reproductive Biology of the Indian Mackerel, Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier 1817), from Salalah, Dhofar Coast, Oman Characteristics of Moisture Content, Swelling, Opacity and Transparency with Addition Chitosan as Edible Films/Coating Base on Casein Anti-Quorum Sensing Activity of Argentinean Honey and Effect of pH on Main Flavonoids A Quick Biochemical Comparison between the Traditional Fermentation of Plantain Wine and Banana Wine Produced in Republic of Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1