法匹拉韦治疗中度COVID-19患者的疗效:一项随机、开放标签、对照临床试验

S. Tehrani, D. Yadegarinia, Afshin Bagherzade, L. Gachkar, Amirreza Keyvanfar
{"title":"法匹拉韦治疗中度COVID-19患者的疗效:一项随机、开放标签、对照临床试验","authors":"S. Tehrani, D. Yadegarinia, Afshin Bagherzade, L. Gachkar, Amirreza Keyvanfar","doi":"10.4274/mjima.galenos.2022.2022.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Since the beginning of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, scientists have studied many drugs to treat it, but none of them have been approved as a complete cure. Favipiravir is one of those drugs that effectively clears the body from the virus by interfering with the process of replication. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of favipiravir compared with supportive medication to treat moderate COVID-19 patients. Materials and Methods: In this randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial, we examined the efficacy of favipiravir to treat moderate COVID-19 patients. The study was conducted in Labbafinejad Hospital (Tehran, Iran) from April to September 2021. A 1:1 ratio of eligible patients were assigned to the intervention and control groups. The control group received supportive medication. In addition to supportive medication, the intervention group received favipiravir. The primary endpoint was the hospitalization rate during the seven-day follow-up. And the secondary endpoints were symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests of the patients. Results: Out of 78 patients who were included in the study, 40 patients were assigned to the control group and 38 patients were assigned to the intervention group. At the beginning of treatment, the respiratory rate was higher in the intervention group (p=0.001), however, on the fifth (p=0.001) and seventh (p<0.001) days, it was significantly lower in the intervention group. In addition, oxygen saturation at the beginning of treatment was lower in the intervention group (p<0.001);however, on the fifth (p=0.016) and seventh (p<0.001) days, it was significantly higher in the intervention group. Furthermore, the consumption of favipiravir was not associated with the hospitalization rate (p=0.200). Conclusion: Favipiravir enhances respiratory manifestations in patients with moderate COVID-19 when compared to supportive medication alone.","PeriodicalId":53879,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials","volume":"204 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Favipiravir in the Treatment of Moderate COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized, Open-label, Controlled Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"S. Tehrani, D. Yadegarinia, Afshin Bagherzade, L. Gachkar, Amirreza Keyvanfar\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/mjima.galenos.2022.2022.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Since the beginning of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, scientists have studied many drugs to treat it, but none of them have been approved as a complete cure. Favipiravir is one of those drugs that effectively clears the body from the virus by interfering with the process of replication. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of favipiravir compared with supportive medication to treat moderate COVID-19 patients. Materials and Methods: In this randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial, we examined the efficacy of favipiravir to treat moderate COVID-19 patients. The study was conducted in Labbafinejad Hospital (Tehran, Iran) from April to September 2021. A 1:1 ratio of eligible patients were assigned to the intervention and control groups. The control group received supportive medication. In addition to supportive medication, the intervention group received favipiravir. The primary endpoint was the hospitalization rate during the seven-day follow-up. And the secondary endpoints were symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests of the patients. Results: Out of 78 patients who were included in the study, 40 patients were assigned to the control group and 38 patients were assigned to the intervention group. At the beginning of treatment, the respiratory rate was higher in the intervention group (p=0.001), however, on the fifth (p=0.001) and seventh (p<0.001) days, it was significantly lower in the intervention group. In addition, oxygen saturation at the beginning of treatment was lower in the intervention group (p<0.001);however, on the fifth (p=0.016) and seventh (p<0.001) days, it was significantly higher in the intervention group. Furthermore, the consumption of favipiravir was not associated with the hospitalization rate (p=0.200). Conclusion: Favipiravir enhances respiratory manifestations in patients with moderate COVID-19 when compared to supportive medication alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials\",\"volume\":\"204 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/mjima.galenos.2022.2022.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/mjima.galenos.2022.2022.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

导语:自2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行开始以来,科学家们研究了许多治疗药物,但没有一种药物被批准为完全治愈。Favipiravir是一种通过干扰病毒复制过程有效清除体内病毒的药物。本研究旨在比较favipiravir与支持性药物治疗中度COVID-19患者的疗效。材料与方法:在这项随机、开放标签、对照临床试验中,我们研究了favipiravir治疗中度COVID-19患者的疗效。该研究于2021年4月至9月在伊朗德黑兰的Labbafinejad医院进行。符合条件的患者按1:1的比例分为干预组和对照组。对照组给予支持性药物治疗。除了支持性药物外,干预组还接受了favipiravir。主要终点是7天随访期间的住院率。次要终点是患者的症状、体征和实验室检查。结果:纳入研究的78例患者中,40例患者被分配到对照组,38例患者被分配到干预组。在治疗开始时,干预组呼吸频率较高(p=0.001),但在第5天(p=0.001)和第7天(p<0.001),干预组呼吸频率明显降低。此外,干预组治疗开始时血氧饱和度较低(p<0.001),但在第5天(p=0.016)和第7天(p<0.001),干预组血氧饱和度显著高于治疗前(p<0.001)。此外,favipiravir的用量与住院率无关(p=0.200)。结论:与单纯支持用药相比,Favipiravir可改善中度COVID-19患者的呼吸症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Favipiravir in the Treatment of Moderate COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized, Open-label, Controlled Clinical Trial
Introduction: Since the beginning of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, scientists have studied many drugs to treat it, but none of them have been approved as a complete cure. Favipiravir is one of those drugs that effectively clears the body from the virus by interfering with the process of replication. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of favipiravir compared with supportive medication to treat moderate COVID-19 patients. Materials and Methods: In this randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial, we examined the efficacy of favipiravir to treat moderate COVID-19 patients. The study was conducted in Labbafinejad Hospital (Tehran, Iran) from April to September 2021. A 1:1 ratio of eligible patients were assigned to the intervention and control groups. The control group received supportive medication. In addition to supportive medication, the intervention group received favipiravir. The primary endpoint was the hospitalization rate during the seven-day follow-up. And the secondary endpoints were symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests of the patients. Results: Out of 78 patients who were included in the study, 40 patients were assigned to the control group and 38 patients were assigned to the intervention group. At the beginning of treatment, the respiratory rate was higher in the intervention group (p=0.001), however, on the fifth (p=0.001) and seventh (p<0.001) days, it was significantly lower in the intervention group. In addition, oxygen saturation at the beginning of treatment was lower in the intervention group (p<0.001);however, on the fifth (p=0.016) and seventh (p<0.001) days, it was significantly higher in the intervention group. Furthermore, the consumption of favipiravir was not associated with the hospitalization rate (p=0.200). Conclusion: Favipiravir enhances respiratory manifestations in patients with moderate COVID-19 when compared to supportive medication alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Changing Infection Dynamics with the Pandemic: Distribution of Viral Agents of Respiratory Tract Infections in the Last 5 Years The Outcomes of Direct-acting Antiviral Treatment in 177 Patients with Hepatitis C Virus: A single-center Experience Septik Artritin Nadir Nedeni: Salmonella Group B Streptococcus Carriage in Pregnancy: The Burden of Early-onset Neonatal Disease and Estimation of the Cost of Universal Antenatal Screening in a Hospital of the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia Effect of Colchicine on Secondaryacute Lung Injury in an Experimental Rat Sepsis Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1