{"title":"CMOS 65nm FBMC接收器的硅面积及与OFDM接收器的比较","authors":"V. Berg, Jean-Baptiste Doré, S. Mayrargue","doi":"10.1109/EuCNC.2017.7980690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New waveforms are considered by the fifth generation (5G) of cellular networks to exploit the underutilized fragmented spectrum. FBMC is one possibility as it provides better adjacent channel leakage. This paper brings a first estimate of silicon area for FBMC in comparison to OFDM assuming a CMOS 65nm technology. The paper concludes that the silicon area overhead introduced by much more complex waveforms is deemed acceptable.","PeriodicalId":6626,"journal":{"name":"2017 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC)","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silicon area of FBMC receivers for CMOS 65nm and comparison to OFDM receivers\",\"authors\":\"V. Berg, Jean-Baptiste Doré, S. Mayrargue\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EuCNC.2017.7980690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New waveforms are considered by the fifth generation (5G) of cellular networks to exploit the underutilized fragmented spectrum. FBMC is one possibility as it provides better adjacent channel leakage. This paper brings a first estimate of silicon area for FBMC in comparison to OFDM assuming a CMOS 65nm technology. The paper concludes that the silicon area overhead introduced by much more complex waveforms is deemed acceptable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC.2017.7980690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC.2017.7980690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Silicon area of FBMC receivers for CMOS 65nm and comparison to OFDM receivers
New waveforms are considered by the fifth generation (5G) of cellular networks to exploit the underutilized fragmented spectrum. FBMC is one possibility as it provides better adjacent channel leakage. This paper brings a first estimate of silicon area for FBMC in comparison to OFDM assuming a CMOS 65nm technology. The paper concludes that the silicon area overhead introduced by much more complex waveforms is deemed acceptable.