Y. Zhang, W. Nock, S. Asad, E. Adams, J. Singh, A. Damicis, M. Lustberg, A. Noonan, R. Reinbolt, S. Sardesai, J. Vandeusen, R. Wesolowski, N. Williams, B. Ramaswamy, D. Stover
{"title":"摘要P3-07-08:原发性三阴性乳腺癌快速和晚期复发的多组学预测因子","authors":"Y. Zhang, W. Nock, S. Asad, E. Adams, J. Singh, A. Damicis, M. Lustberg, A. Noonan, R. Reinbolt, S. Sardesai, J. Vandeusen, R. Wesolowski, N. Williams, B. Ramaswamy, D. Stover","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-P3-07-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease. Clinically, we observe three distinct TNBC outcomes: 1) rapid relapse (rrTNBC) characterized by aggressive drug resistant disease; 2) late relapse (lrTNBC) characterized by indolent or treatment responsive disease; and 3) no relapse (NoRTNBC). We hypothesized that distinct clinical and genomic features of primary tumors define rapid versus late relapse in TNBC. Approach: Using three publicly-available datasets (METABRIC, TCGA, and a prior gene expression meta-analysis), we identified 455 patients diagnosed with primary TNBC with adequate follow-up to be characterized as rrTNBC (relapse or death within 2 years of diagnosis), lrTNBC (relapse or death more than 2 years after diagnosis), or NoRTNBC (no relapse/death with at least 5 years follow-up). We compiled basic clinical (n=455 patients) and primary tumor multi-omic data, including whole transcriptome (n=455), whole genome copy number (n=317), and mutation data for 171 cancer-related genes (n=317). We evaluated intrinsic subtypes (PAM50, TNBCtype), 125 gene expression signatures, CIBERSORT immune subsets, copy number, and mutation frequency. Results: We first evaluated patients with relapse (rrTNBC+lrTNBC) vs. NoRTNBC. There was no significant difference in age, grade, stage at diagnosis, or PAM50 or TNBC subtype proportion between relapse and NoRTNBC. Among 125 expression signatures, five immune signatures were significantly higher in NoRTNBCs (FDR p = 0.3, all p Conclusions: Primary TNBC tumors destined for rapid, late, or no relapse reflect distinct genomic features. Anti-tumor immune signatures and subsets are enriched in patients who do not relapse yet no difference in mutational or copy number burden. Relative to rapid relapse TNBCs, late relapse TNBCs are enriched for non-basal tumors, estrogen/luminal expression signatures, and mutations in DNAH11 and PIK3CA. Citation Format: Zhang Y, Nock W, Asad S, Adams E, Singh J, Damicis A, Lustberg MB, Noonan A, Reinbolt R, Sardesai S, VanDeusen J, Wesolowski R, Williams N, Ramaswamy B, Stover DG. Multi-omic predictor of rapid and late relapse in primary triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-08.","PeriodicalId":20307,"journal":{"name":"Poster Session Abstracts","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract P3-07-08: Multi-omic predictor of rapid and late relapse in primary triple negative breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"Y. Zhang, W. Nock, S. Asad, E. Adams, J. Singh, A. Damicis, M. Lustberg, A. Noonan, R. Reinbolt, S. Sardesai, J. Vandeusen, R. Wesolowski, N. Williams, B. Ramaswamy, D. Stover\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-P3-07-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease. Clinically, we observe three distinct TNBC outcomes: 1) rapid relapse (rrTNBC) characterized by aggressive drug resistant disease; 2) late relapse (lrTNBC) characterized by indolent or treatment responsive disease; and 3) no relapse (NoRTNBC). We hypothesized that distinct clinical and genomic features of primary tumors define rapid versus late relapse in TNBC. Approach: Using three publicly-available datasets (METABRIC, TCGA, and a prior gene expression meta-analysis), we identified 455 patients diagnosed with primary TNBC with adequate follow-up to be characterized as rrTNBC (relapse or death within 2 years of diagnosis), lrTNBC (relapse or death more than 2 years after diagnosis), or NoRTNBC (no relapse/death with at least 5 years follow-up). We compiled basic clinical (n=455 patients) and primary tumor multi-omic data, including whole transcriptome (n=455), whole genome copy number (n=317), and mutation data for 171 cancer-related genes (n=317). We evaluated intrinsic subtypes (PAM50, TNBCtype), 125 gene expression signatures, CIBERSORT immune subsets, copy number, and mutation frequency. Results: We first evaluated patients with relapse (rrTNBC+lrTNBC) vs. NoRTNBC. There was no significant difference in age, grade, stage at diagnosis, or PAM50 or TNBC subtype proportion between relapse and NoRTNBC. Among 125 expression signatures, five immune signatures were significantly higher in NoRTNBCs (FDR p = 0.3, all p Conclusions: Primary TNBC tumors destined for rapid, late, or no relapse reflect distinct genomic features. Anti-tumor immune signatures and subsets are enriched in patients who do not relapse yet no difference in mutational or copy number burden. Relative to rapid relapse TNBCs, late relapse TNBCs are enriched for non-basal tumors, estrogen/luminal expression signatures, and mutations in DNAH11 and PIK3CA. Citation Format: Zhang Y, Nock W, Asad S, Adams E, Singh J, Damicis A, Lustberg MB, Noonan A, Reinbolt R, Sardesai S, VanDeusen J, Wesolowski R, Williams N, Ramaswamy B, Stover DG. Multi-omic predictor of rapid and late relapse in primary triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-08.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poster Session Abstracts\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poster Session Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-P3-07-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poster Session Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-P3-07-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)是一种异质性疾病。在临床上,我们观察到三种不同的TNBC结局:1)以侵袭性耐药疾病为特征的快速复发(rrTNBC);2)晚期复发(lrTNBC),表现为惰性或治疗反应性疾病;3)无复发(NoRTNBC)。我们假设原发性肿瘤的不同临床和基因组特征决定了TNBC的快速复发和晚期复发。方法:使用三个公开可用的数据集(METABRIC, TCGA和先前的基因表达荟萃分析),我们确定了455例经充分随访诊断为原发性TNBC的患者,其特征为rrTNBC(诊断后2年内复发或死亡),lrTNBC(诊断后2年以上复发或死亡)或NoRTNBC(随访至少5年未复发/死亡)。我们收集了基础临床(n=455例)和原发肿瘤多组学数据,包括171个癌症相关基因(n=317)的全转录组(n=455)、全基因组拷贝数(n=317)和突变数据。我们评估了内在亚型(PAM50, TNBCtype), 125个基因表达特征,CIBERSORT免疫亚群,拷贝数和突变频率。结果:我们首先评估了复发患者(rrTNBC+lrTNBC)与NoRTNBC。复发与NoRTNBC在年龄、分级、诊断分期、PAM50或TNBC亚型比例上无显著差异。在125个表达特征中,有5个免疫特征在nortnbc中显著升高(FDR p = 0.3,所有p)。结论:原发性TNBC肿瘤以快速、晚期或无复发为目的,反映了不同的基因组特征。在没有复发的患者中,抗肿瘤免疫特征和亚群丰富,但在突变或拷贝数负担方面没有差异。相对于快速复发的tnbc,晚期复发的tnbc在非基底肿瘤、雌激素/腔内表达特征以及DNAH11和PIK3CA突变中富集。引文格式:张勇,Nock W, Asad S, Adams E, Singh J, Damicis A, Lustberg MB, Noonan A, Reinbolt R, Sardesai S, VanDeusen J, Wesolowski R, Williams N, Ramaswamy B, Stover DG。原发性三阴性乳腺癌快速和晚期复发的多组学预测因子[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;中国癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):P3-07-08。
Abstract P3-07-08: Multi-omic predictor of rapid and late relapse in primary triple negative breast cancer
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease. Clinically, we observe three distinct TNBC outcomes: 1) rapid relapse (rrTNBC) characterized by aggressive drug resistant disease; 2) late relapse (lrTNBC) characterized by indolent or treatment responsive disease; and 3) no relapse (NoRTNBC). We hypothesized that distinct clinical and genomic features of primary tumors define rapid versus late relapse in TNBC. Approach: Using three publicly-available datasets (METABRIC, TCGA, and a prior gene expression meta-analysis), we identified 455 patients diagnosed with primary TNBC with adequate follow-up to be characterized as rrTNBC (relapse or death within 2 years of diagnosis), lrTNBC (relapse or death more than 2 years after diagnosis), or NoRTNBC (no relapse/death with at least 5 years follow-up). We compiled basic clinical (n=455 patients) and primary tumor multi-omic data, including whole transcriptome (n=455), whole genome copy number (n=317), and mutation data for 171 cancer-related genes (n=317). We evaluated intrinsic subtypes (PAM50, TNBCtype), 125 gene expression signatures, CIBERSORT immune subsets, copy number, and mutation frequency. Results: We first evaluated patients with relapse (rrTNBC+lrTNBC) vs. NoRTNBC. There was no significant difference in age, grade, stage at diagnosis, or PAM50 or TNBC subtype proportion between relapse and NoRTNBC. Among 125 expression signatures, five immune signatures were significantly higher in NoRTNBCs (FDR p = 0.3, all p Conclusions: Primary TNBC tumors destined for rapid, late, or no relapse reflect distinct genomic features. Anti-tumor immune signatures and subsets are enriched in patients who do not relapse yet no difference in mutational or copy number burden. Relative to rapid relapse TNBCs, late relapse TNBCs are enriched for non-basal tumors, estrogen/luminal expression signatures, and mutations in DNAH11 and PIK3CA. Citation Format: Zhang Y, Nock W, Asad S, Adams E, Singh J, Damicis A, Lustberg MB, Noonan A, Reinbolt R, Sardesai S, VanDeusen J, Wesolowski R, Williams N, Ramaswamy B, Stover DG. Multi-omic predictor of rapid and late relapse in primary triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-08.