作为探究的艺术:艺术与科学研究的理论视角

Kate McCallum
{"title":"作为探究的艺术:艺术与科学研究的理论视角","authors":"Kate McCallum","doi":"10.1162/leon_a_02450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As the question of art-practice-as-research is considered, a reasonable way to assess its validity is to compare the aims and practices of art with those of traditionally research-oriented disciplines like science and philosophy. Examination of ideas from the philosophy of science and art theory suggest shared emphases on rigour by community consensus, and on the generation of new ways of seeing and of thinking.","PeriodicalId":93330,"journal":{"name":"Leonardo (Oxford, England)","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Art as Enquiry: Theoretical Perspectives on Research in Art and Science\",\"authors\":\"Kate McCallum\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/leon_a_02450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n As the question of art-practice-as-research is considered, a reasonable way to assess its validity is to compare the aims and practices of art with those of traditionally research-oriented disciplines like science and philosophy. Examination of ideas from the philosophy of science and art theory suggest shared emphases on rigour by community consensus, and on the generation of new ways of seeing and of thinking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leonardo (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leonardo (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leonardo (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到艺术-实践-作为研究的问题,评估其有效性的一个合理方法是将艺术的目标和实践与传统的研究型学科(如科学和哲学)进行比较。对科学哲学和艺术理论思想的考察表明,他们都强调社会共识的严谨性,以及产生新的观察和思考方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Art as Enquiry: Theoretical Perspectives on Research in Art and Science
As the question of art-practice-as-research is considered, a reasonable way to assess its validity is to compare the aims and practices of art with those of traditionally research-oriented disciplines like science and philosophy. Examination of ideas from the philosophy of science and art theory suggest shared emphases on rigour by community consensus, and on the generation of new ways of seeing and of thinking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urban Intonation: Listening to the Rats of New York City Art as Enquiry: Theoretical Perspectives on Research in Art and Science Lichens: Toward a Minimal Resistance Life in the Posthuman Condition: Critical Responses to the Anthropocene Invention and Innovation: A Brief History of Hype and Failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1