伊拉克巴比伦考古城的地球物理调查

Sany Hannian, B. Hijab, Amer A. Laftah
{"title":"伊拉克巴比伦考古城的地球物理调查","authors":"Sany Hannian, B. Hijab, Amer A. Laftah","doi":"10.24237/djps.17.03.533c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A geophysical survey was carried out at old archeological Babylon City, which is located 90.0 km to the south of Baghdad. Three geophysical methods were applied in this survey. The VES resistivity method, for soil conductivity and layering testing. GPR and magnetic methods, for detecting subsurface archeological bodies. The resistivity results showed values lower than 5.0 ohm. m, and subsurface distortion, which are probably related to buried archeological ruins. Due to the low electrical resistivity of the top soil, the GPR method did not reach a good penetrating depth. Wide range of frequencies, 30 MHz, 250 MHz, 500 MHz, and 100MHz were applied. The high signal attenuation of the top soil resulted in distorted radar-grams with faint shallow anomalies. The GPR survey was conducted at different seasons hoping that the dry conditions of the hot summer could change the top soil electrical resistivity. Nevertheless, few GPR radar- grams show point reflections that related to small dense bodies at depths of 0.8 – 2.0, which could be archeological bricks walls. The magnetic survey was carried out in two stages using Cesium magnetometer of high sensitivity. An area of 140.0 m x 240.0 m was surveyed at the first stage, which is covered by twenty-eight N-S traverses. The preliminary results show the effects of the N-S profiling, which can be removed by directional first derivative filter. It showed indications of subsurface archeological features. In the second stage, an area of 40.0 x 40.0 meters was chosen for detailed survey. The survey is done a long 40 traverses in N-S direction and another 40.0 Traverses along W-E directions. The preliminary results of the both surveys show some differences. These differences were removed by using first derivative filter. They both showed subsurface geometric shapes that are probably related to buried archeological walls. The mathematical modeling results showed walls of widths 0.3-0.4 meters at depths around 0.8 meters. These walls continue down to 2.3-2.5 meters in depth. The magnetic survey also showed many circular high magnetic anomalies within an area of 1.0 – 2.0 meters only. The mathematical modeling suggested that these anomalies could be corresponding to building poles made of andesite or basaltic rocks or they are buried metals objects.","PeriodicalId":11231,"journal":{"name":"Diyala Journal for Pure Science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geophysical Investigation of Babylon archeological City, Iraq\",\"authors\":\"Sany Hannian, B. Hijab, Amer A. Laftah\",\"doi\":\"10.24237/djps.17.03.533c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A geophysical survey was carried out at old archeological Babylon City, which is located 90.0 km to the south of Baghdad. Three geophysical methods were applied in this survey. The VES resistivity method, for soil conductivity and layering testing. GPR and magnetic methods, for detecting subsurface archeological bodies. The resistivity results showed values lower than 5.0 ohm. m, and subsurface distortion, which are probably related to buried archeological ruins. Due to the low electrical resistivity of the top soil, the GPR method did not reach a good penetrating depth. Wide range of frequencies, 30 MHz, 250 MHz, 500 MHz, and 100MHz were applied. The high signal attenuation of the top soil resulted in distorted radar-grams with faint shallow anomalies. The GPR survey was conducted at different seasons hoping that the dry conditions of the hot summer could change the top soil electrical resistivity. Nevertheless, few GPR radar- grams show point reflections that related to small dense bodies at depths of 0.8 – 2.0, which could be archeological bricks walls. The magnetic survey was carried out in two stages using Cesium magnetometer of high sensitivity. An area of 140.0 m x 240.0 m was surveyed at the first stage, which is covered by twenty-eight N-S traverses. The preliminary results show the effects of the N-S profiling, which can be removed by directional first derivative filter. It showed indications of subsurface archeological features. In the second stage, an area of 40.0 x 40.0 meters was chosen for detailed survey. The survey is done a long 40 traverses in N-S direction and another 40.0 Traverses along W-E directions. The preliminary results of the both surveys show some differences. These differences were removed by using first derivative filter. They both showed subsurface geometric shapes that are probably related to buried archeological walls. The mathematical modeling results showed walls of widths 0.3-0.4 meters at depths around 0.8 meters. These walls continue down to 2.3-2.5 meters in depth. The magnetic survey also showed many circular high magnetic anomalies within an area of 1.0 – 2.0 meters only. The mathematical modeling suggested that these anomalies could be corresponding to building poles made of andesite or basaltic rocks or they are buried metals objects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diyala Journal for Pure Science\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diyala Journal for Pure Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24237/djps.17.03.533c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diyala Journal for Pure Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24237/djps.17.03.533c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在位于巴格达以南90.0公里的古代考古巴比伦城进行了地球物理调查。本次调查采用了三种地球物理方法。VES电阻率法,用于土壤电导率和分层测试。探地雷达和磁法,用于探测地下考古体。电阻率结果低于5.0欧姆。M和地下变形,这可能与埋藏的考古遗址有关。由于表层土的电阻率较低,探地雷达方法没有达到良好的穿透深度。广泛的频率范围,30mhz, 250mhz, 500mhz和100MHz的应用。表层土壤的高信号衰减导致雷达图失真,浅层异常微弱。探地雷达调查在不同季节进行,希望炎热夏季的干燥条件可以改变表层土壤电阻率。然而,很少有GPR雷达图显示与0.8 - 2.0深度的小致密体相关的点反射,这可能是考古砖墙。采用高灵敏度铯磁力计分两个阶段进行磁测。第一阶段测量了140.0 m x 240.0 m的区域,该区域由28条南北向穿越线覆盖。初步结果表明,N-S谱的影响可以通过定向一阶导数滤波器消除。它显示了地下考古特征的迹象。在第二阶段,选择40.0 × 40.0米的面积进行详细调查。该测量在南北方向上进行了40次,在东西向上进行了40次。两项调查的初步结果显示出一些差异。利用一阶导数滤波法消除了这些差异。它们都显示出地下的几何形状,可能与埋藏的考古墙有关。数学模拟结果显示,在深度约0.8米的地方,墙壁的宽度为0.3-0.4米。这些墙一直延伸到2.3-2.5米深。磁测还显示,仅在1.0 ~ 2.0米范围内,就有许多圆形高磁异常。数学模型表明,这些异常可能与安山岩或玄武岩构成的建筑极点相对应,或者它们是埋藏的金属物体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geophysical Investigation of Babylon archeological City, Iraq
A geophysical survey was carried out at old archeological Babylon City, which is located 90.0 km to the south of Baghdad. Three geophysical methods were applied in this survey. The VES resistivity method, for soil conductivity and layering testing. GPR and magnetic methods, for detecting subsurface archeological bodies. The resistivity results showed values lower than 5.0 ohm. m, and subsurface distortion, which are probably related to buried archeological ruins. Due to the low electrical resistivity of the top soil, the GPR method did not reach a good penetrating depth. Wide range of frequencies, 30 MHz, 250 MHz, 500 MHz, and 100MHz were applied. The high signal attenuation of the top soil resulted in distorted radar-grams with faint shallow anomalies. The GPR survey was conducted at different seasons hoping that the dry conditions of the hot summer could change the top soil electrical resistivity. Nevertheless, few GPR radar- grams show point reflections that related to small dense bodies at depths of 0.8 – 2.0, which could be archeological bricks walls. The magnetic survey was carried out in two stages using Cesium magnetometer of high sensitivity. An area of 140.0 m x 240.0 m was surveyed at the first stage, which is covered by twenty-eight N-S traverses. The preliminary results show the effects of the N-S profiling, which can be removed by directional first derivative filter. It showed indications of subsurface archeological features. In the second stage, an area of 40.0 x 40.0 meters was chosen for detailed survey. The survey is done a long 40 traverses in N-S direction and another 40.0 Traverses along W-E directions. The preliminary results of the both surveys show some differences. These differences were removed by using first derivative filter. They both showed subsurface geometric shapes that are probably related to buried archeological walls. The mathematical modeling results showed walls of widths 0.3-0.4 meters at depths around 0.8 meters. These walls continue down to 2.3-2.5 meters in depth. The magnetic survey also showed many circular high magnetic anomalies within an area of 1.0 – 2.0 meters only. The mathematical modeling suggested that these anomalies could be corresponding to building poles made of andesite or basaltic rocks or they are buried metals objects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synthesis and Characterization of Magnetic (Co-Ni-Fe2O4) Nano Ferrite for Biomedical Application Preparation and Study of Some Properties, Apparent Porosity, True Density and Water Absorption of Polymeric Films (PVA) Reinforced by CdCl2.H2O Salt. Preparation and Study of Some Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Blend Films [PVA: PVP-CaCl2.2H2O] A Hybrid System for Classification of Skin Cancer Images Using Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine Study of the Morphological, Optical, and Thermal Properties of the Polymeric Blend CMC/PEG Reinforced by Various Concentrations of Au NPs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1