日语、汉语、越南语、印度尼西亚语和美国听众声调感知的跨文化比较

IF 0.6 0 MUSIC Psychomusicology Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.1037/pmu0000219
R. Matsunaga, Toshinori Yasuda, Michelle Johnson‐Motoyama, P. Hartono, K. Yokosawa, J. Abe
{"title":"日语、汉语、越南语、印度尼西亚语和美国听众声调感知的跨文化比较","authors":"R. Matsunaga, Toshinori Yasuda, Michelle Johnson‐Motoyama, P. Hartono, K. Yokosawa, J. Abe","doi":"10.1037/pmu0000219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated tonal perception of melodies from 2 cultures (Western and traditional Japanese) by 5 different cultural groups (44 Japanese, 25 Chinese, 16 Vietnamese, 18 Indonesians, and 25 U.S. citizens). Listeners rated the degree of “melodic completeness” of the final tone (a tonic vs. a nontonic) and “happiness–sadness” in the mode (major vs. minor, YOH vs. IN) of each melody. When Western melodies were presented, American and Japanese listeners responded similarly, such that they reflected implicit tonal knowledge of Western music. By contrast, the responses of Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indonesian listeners were different from those of American and Japanese listeners. When traditional Japanese melodies were presented, Japanese listeners exhibited responses that reflected implicit tonal knowledge of traditional Japanese music. American listeners also showed responses that were like the Japanese; however, the pattern of responses differed between the 2 groups. Alternatively, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indonesian listeners exhibited different responses from the Japanese. These results show large differences between the Chinese/Vietnamese/Indonesian group and the American/Japanese group. Furthermore, the differences in responses to Western melodies between Americans and Japanese were less pronounced than that between Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indonesians. These findings imply that cultural differences in tonal perception are more diverse and distinctive than previously believed.","PeriodicalId":29942,"journal":{"name":"Psychomusicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Tonality Perception in Japanese, Chinese, Vietnamese, Indonesian, and American Listeners\",\"authors\":\"R. Matsunaga, Toshinori Yasuda, Michelle Johnson‐Motoyama, P. Hartono, K. Yokosawa, J. Abe\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pmu0000219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigated tonal perception of melodies from 2 cultures (Western and traditional Japanese) by 5 different cultural groups (44 Japanese, 25 Chinese, 16 Vietnamese, 18 Indonesians, and 25 U.S. citizens). Listeners rated the degree of “melodic completeness” of the final tone (a tonic vs. a nontonic) and “happiness–sadness” in the mode (major vs. minor, YOH vs. IN) of each melody. When Western melodies were presented, American and Japanese listeners responded similarly, such that they reflected implicit tonal knowledge of Western music. By contrast, the responses of Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indonesian listeners were different from those of American and Japanese listeners. When traditional Japanese melodies were presented, Japanese listeners exhibited responses that reflected implicit tonal knowledge of traditional Japanese music. American listeners also showed responses that were like the Japanese; however, the pattern of responses differed between the 2 groups. Alternatively, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indonesian listeners exhibited different responses from the Japanese. These results show large differences between the Chinese/Vietnamese/Indonesian group and the American/Japanese group. Furthermore, the differences in responses to Western melodies between Americans and Japanese were less pronounced than that between Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indonesians. These findings imply that cultural differences in tonal perception are more diverse and distinctive than previously believed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychomusicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychomusicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychomusicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们调查了5个不同文化群体(44个日本人、25个中国人、16个越南人、18个印度尼西亚人和25个美国人)对两种文化(西方和传统日本)旋律的调性感知。听众对每个旋律的调式(大调与小调,YOH与in)中最后一个音调的“旋律完整性”程度(主音与非主音)和“快乐-悲伤”程度进行了评分。当播放西方旋律时,美国和日本听众的反应相似,这反映了他们对西方音乐的含蓄的调性知识。相比之下,中国、越南和印度尼西亚听众的反应与美国和日本听众的反应不同。当播放传统的日本旋律时,日本听众表现出的反应反映了对传统日本音乐的含蓄的调性知识。美国听众的反应也和日本人一样;然而,两组之间的反应模式有所不同。另外,中国、越南和印度尼西亚的听众表现出与日本人不同的反应。这些结果显示了中国/越南/印尼群体和美国/日本群体之间的巨大差异。此外,与中国人、越南人和印度尼西亚人相比,美国人和日本人对西方旋律的反应差异不那么明显。这些发现表明,音调感知的文化差异比之前认为的更加多样化和独特。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Tonality Perception in Japanese, Chinese, Vietnamese, Indonesian, and American Listeners
We investigated tonal perception of melodies from 2 cultures (Western and traditional Japanese) by 5 different cultural groups (44 Japanese, 25 Chinese, 16 Vietnamese, 18 Indonesians, and 25 U.S. citizens). Listeners rated the degree of “melodic completeness” of the final tone (a tonic vs. a nontonic) and “happiness–sadness” in the mode (major vs. minor, YOH vs. IN) of each melody. When Western melodies were presented, American and Japanese listeners responded similarly, such that they reflected implicit tonal knowledge of Western music. By contrast, the responses of Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indonesian listeners were different from those of American and Japanese listeners. When traditional Japanese melodies were presented, Japanese listeners exhibited responses that reflected implicit tonal knowledge of traditional Japanese music. American listeners also showed responses that were like the Japanese; however, the pattern of responses differed between the 2 groups. Alternatively, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indonesian listeners exhibited different responses from the Japanese. These results show large differences between the Chinese/Vietnamese/Indonesian group and the American/Japanese group. Furthermore, the differences in responses to Western melodies between Americans and Japanese were less pronounced than that between Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indonesians. These findings imply that cultural differences in tonal perception are more diverse and distinctive than previously believed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychomusicology
Psychomusicology Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Preferred Music Listening Does Not Affect Cognitive Inhibition in Young and Older Adults Preferred music listening does not affect cognitive inhibition in young and older adults. Capturing coordination and intentionality in joint musical improvisation. Supplemental Material for Capturing Coordination and Intentionality in Joint Musical Improvisation Absolute pitch: A literature review of underlying factors, with special regard to music pedagogy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1