摘要-吡非尼酮治疗进行性纤维化不可分类ILD (uILD)患者的II期临床试验

T. Maher, T. Corte, A. Fischer, M. Kreuter, D. Lederer, M. Molina-Molina, J. Axmann, K. Kirchgaessler, K. Samara, F. Gilberg, V. Cottin
{"title":"摘要-吡非尼酮治疗进行性纤维化不可分类ILD (uILD)患者的II期临床试验","authors":"T. Maher, T. Corte, A. Fischer, M. Kreuter, D. Lederer, M. Molina-Molina, J. Axmann, K. Kirchgaessler, K. Samara, F. Gilberg, V. Cottin","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.rct1880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There are no approved therapies for patients with uILD, who may have irreversible ILD. We evaluated efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with progressive fibrosing uILD. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Phase II trial (NCT03099187). The primary endpoint was predicted FVC change over 24 weeks measured by daily home spirometry; secondary endpoints included changes in FVC (measured at site visits), DLco and 6MWD. Safety was also assessed. Results: 253 patients were randomised and 251 were treated (n=127 pirfenidone; n=124 placebo). Analysis of the primary endpoint was impacted by high intra-individual variability in home spirometry values in both treatment groups, amplified in patients with short observation periods, which prevented application of the planned statistical model. Median (Q1, Q3) FVC change (home spirometry) over 24 weeks was –87.7 mL (–338.1, 148.6) and –157.1 mL (–370.9, 70.1) in pirfenidone and placebo groups, respectively (Table). FVC change measured at site visits considerably favoured pirfenidone over placebo; results for DLco and 6MWD generally trended towards pirfenidone (Table). AE reporting reflected the known safety profile of pirfenidone. Conclusions: The planned statistical model could not be applied to the primary endpoint data. Results of key secondary endpoints suggest patients with progressive fibrosing uILD benefit from pirfenidone.","PeriodicalId":13242,"journal":{"name":"Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late Breaking Abstract - Phase II trial of pirfenidone in patients with progressive fibrosing unclassifiable ILD (uILD)\",\"authors\":\"T. Maher, T. Corte, A. Fischer, M. Kreuter, D. Lederer, M. Molina-Molina, J. Axmann, K. Kirchgaessler, K. Samara, F. Gilberg, V. Cottin\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.rct1880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: There are no approved therapies for patients with uILD, who may have irreversible ILD. We evaluated efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with progressive fibrosing uILD. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Phase II trial (NCT03099187). The primary endpoint was predicted FVC change over 24 weeks measured by daily home spirometry; secondary endpoints included changes in FVC (measured at site visits), DLco and 6MWD. Safety was also assessed. Results: 253 patients were randomised and 251 were treated (n=127 pirfenidone; n=124 placebo). Analysis of the primary endpoint was impacted by high intra-individual variability in home spirometry values in both treatment groups, amplified in patients with short observation periods, which prevented application of the planned statistical model. Median (Q1, Q3) FVC change (home spirometry) over 24 weeks was –87.7 mL (–338.1, 148.6) and –157.1 mL (–370.9, 70.1) in pirfenidone and placebo groups, respectively (Table). FVC change measured at site visits considerably favoured pirfenidone over placebo; results for DLco and 6MWD generally trended towards pirfenidone (Table). AE reporting reflected the known safety profile of pirfenidone. Conclusions: The planned statistical model could not be applied to the primary endpoint data. Results of key secondary endpoints suggest patients with progressive fibrosing uILD benefit from pirfenidone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.rct1880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.rct1880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对于可能具有不可逆ILD的患者,目前还没有批准的治疗方法。我们评估了吡非尼酮在进行性纤维化ild患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的II期试验(NCT03099187)。主要终点是通过每日家庭肺活量测定预测FVC在24周内的变化;次要终点包括FVC(实地考察时测量)、DLco和6MWD的变化。安全性也进行了评估。结果:253例患者随机分组,251例患者接受治疗(n=127匹非尼酮;n = 124安慰剂)。主要终点的分析受到两个治疗组中家庭肺活量测定值的高度个体内变异性的影响,在观察期较短的患者中,这种变异性被放大,这阻碍了计划统计模型的应用。吡非尼酮组和安慰剂组24周内FVC变化中位数(Q1, Q3)分别为-87.7 mL(-338.1, 148.6)和-157.1 mL(-370.9, 70.1)(表)。在实地考察中测量的植被覆盖度变化明显有利于吡非尼酮而不是安慰剂;DLco和6MWD的结果普遍倾向于吡非尼酮(表)。AE报告反映了吡非尼酮已知的安全性。结论:计划的统计模型不能应用于主要终点数据。关键次要终点的结果表明,进展性纤维化的ild患者将受益于吡非尼酮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Late Breaking Abstract - Phase II trial of pirfenidone in patients with progressive fibrosing unclassifiable ILD (uILD)
Introduction: There are no approved therapies for patients with uILD, who may have irreversible ILD. We evaluated efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with progressive fibrosing uILD. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Phase II trial (NCT03099187). The primary endpoint was predicted FVC change over 24 weeks measured by daily home spirometry; secondary endpoints included changes in FVC (measured at site visits), DLco and 6MWD. Safety was also assessed. Results: 253 patients were randomised and 251 were treated (n=127 pirfenidone; n=124 placebo). Analysis of the primary endpoint was impacted by high intra-individual variability in home spirometry values in both treatment groups, amplified in patients with short observation periods, which prevented application of the planned statistical model. Median (Q1, Q3) FVC change (home spirometry) over 24 weeks was –87.7 mL (–338.1, 148.6) and –157.1 mL (–370.9, 70.1) in pirfenidone and placebo groups, respectively (Table). FVC change measured at site visits considerably favoured pirfenidone over placebo; results for DLco and 6MWD generally trended towards pirfenidone (Table). AE reporting reflected the known safety profile of pirfenidone. Conclusions: The planned statistical model could not be applied to the primary endpoint data. Results of key secondary endpoints suggest patients with progressive fibrosing uILD benefit from pirfenidone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential expression of PD-1/PD-L1 axis in mediastinal lymph nodes of experimental and human lung fibrosis Systematic review and meta-analysis of interstitial lung disease transcriptomics Myeloid cells immunomodulate tissue niches and promotes idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Profibrotic and proinflammatory pulmonary response to bleomycin in a Swiss nude mice model Mitochondrial iron regulates AEC2 dysfunction, senescence and senescent associated secretory phenotype in response to bleomycin challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1