{"title":"对非标准化资产的讨价还价","authors":"A. Tsoy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2694954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many over-the-counter asset markets, prices are negotiated bilaterally and bargaining over prices takes time. We show that bargaining delays arise when investors have precise private information about the asset quality, but the public information (e.g. credit ratings, benchmarks, past quotes) is coarse. We incorporate this type of bargaining delays into the standard dynamic equilibrium model of over-the-counter markets with search delays a la Duffie, Garleanu and Pedersen (2005) and derive implications of both delays for prices and liquidity. Search and bargaining delays have opposite effects on the range of traded assets showing that the current approach that views search delays as a proxy for all types of delays is with a loss. Conditional on the public information, the liquidity is U-shaped in the quality and assets in the middle of the quality range may not be traded, which contrasts with the descreasing liquidity in asymmetric-information models.","PeriodicalId":11757,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bargaining over a Non-Standardized Asset\",\"authors\":\"A. Tsoy\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2694954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In many over-the-counter asset markets, prices are negotiated bilaterally and bargaining over prices takes time. We show that bargaining delays arise when investors have precise private information about the asset quality, but the public information (e.g. credit ratings, benchmarks, past quotes) is coarse. We incorporate this type of bargaining delays into the standard dynamic equilibrium model of over-the-counter markets with search delays a la Duffie, Garleanu and Pedersen (2005) and derive implications of both delays for prices and liquidity. Search and bargaining delays have opposite effects on the range of traded assets showing that the current approach that views search delays as a proxy for all types of delays is with a loss. Conditional on the public information, the liquidity is U-shaped in the quality and assets in the middle of the quality range may not be traded, which contrasts with the descreasing liquidity in asymmetric-information models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694954\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在许多场外资产市场,价格是双边协商的,讨价还价需要时间。我们表明,当投资者对资产质量有精确的私人信息,但公共信息(如信用评级、基准、过去报价)是粗糙的时,议价延迟就会出现。我们将这种类型的议价延迟纳入具有搜索延迟的场外交易市场的标准动态均衡模型(Duffie, Garleanu和Pedersen, 2005),并得出延迟对价格和流动性的影响。搜索延迟和讨价还价延迟对交易资产的范围有相反的影响,这表明当前将搜索延迟视为所有类型延迟的代理的方法是失败的。在公开信息的条件下,流动性在质量上呈u型,处于质量区间中间的资产可能无法交易,这与非对称信息模型下流动性下降形成对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bargaining over a Non-Standardized Asset
In many over-the-counter asset markets, prices are negotiated bilaterally and bargaining over prices takes time. We show that bargaining delays arise when investors have precise private information about the asset quality, but the public information (e.g. credit ratings, benchmarks, past quotes) is coarse. We incorporate this type of bargaining delays into the standard dynamic equilibrium model of over-the-counter markets with search delays a la Duffie, Garleanu and Pedersen (2005) and derive implications of both delays for prices and liquidity. Search and bargaining delays have opposite effects on the range of traded assets showing that the current approach that views search delays as a proxy for all types of delays is with a loss. Conditional on the public information, the liquidity is U-shaped in the quality and assets in the middle of the quality range may not be traded, which contrasts with the descreasing liquidity in asymmetric-information models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Order-flow-based Leading Indicators of Short-term Liquidity Shortfalls An Equilibrium Model of Career Concerns, Investment Horizons, and Mutual Fund Value Added Information, Market Power and Welfare Stock Liquidity and Algorithmic Market Making During the COVID-19 Crisis Financial Information and Diverging Beliefs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1