细节的缺失才是问题的关键

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Indiana Law Journal Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3504949
Ann M. Killenbeck
{"title":"细节的缺失才是问题的关键","authors":"Ann M. Killenbeck","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3504949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an interesting and potentially important article, Professor Deirdre M. Bowen declares that her goal “is to scrutinize what happens when the judiciary and anti– affirmative action activist groups exploit color blindness to rationalize away affirmative action admissions policies.” 1 She argues that her research and her study demonstrate that “reactionary ‘color blindness’” 2 does not actually show that “affirmative action is no longer necessary.” 3 Instead, she believes the results of her study establish that anti–affirmative action forces have embraced an “ideal [that] does not appear to exist” and are “promoting a deeply flawed discourse [by asserting] that affirmative action causes stigma.” 4","PeriodicalId":46974,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Law Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Devil is in the Lack of Details\",\"authors\":\"Ann M. Killenbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3504949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an interesting and potentially important article, Professor Deirdre M. Bowen declares that her goal “is to scrutinize what happens when the judiciary and anti– affirmative action activist groups exploit color blindness to rationalize away affirmative action admissions policies.” 1 She argues that her research and her study demonstrate that “reactionary ‘color blindness’” 2 does not actually show that “affirmative action is no longer necessary.” 3 Instead, she believes the results of her study establish that anti–affirmative action forces have embraced an “ideal [that] does not appear to exist” and are “promoting a deeply flawed discourse [by asserting] that affirmative action causes stigma.” 4\",\"PeriodicalId\":46974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3504949\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3504949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在一篇有趣且可能很重要的文章中,迪尔德丽·m·鲍恩(Deirdre M. Bowen)教授宣称,她的目标是“仔细审视当司法部门和反平权行动激进组织利用肤色歧视来合理化平权行动的招生政策时,会发生什么。”她辩称,她的研究和她的研究表明,“反动的‘色盲’”实际上并没有表明“平权行动不再必要”。相反,她认为她的研究结果表明,反平权行动的力量接受了一种“似乎不存在的理想”,并且“通过断言平权行动会导致耻辱,来促进一种有严重缺陷的话语”。“4
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Devil is in the Lack of Details
In an interesting and potentially important article, Professor Deirdre M. Bowen declares that her goal “is to scrutinize what happens when the judiciary and anti– affirmative action activist groups exploit color blindness to rationalize away affirmative action admissions policies.” 1 She argues that her research and her study demonstrate that “reactionary ‘color blindness’” 2 does not actually show that “affirmative action is no longer necessary.” 3 Instead, she believes the results of her study establish that anti–affirmative action forces have embraced an “ideal [that] does not appear to exist” and are “promoting a deeply flawed discourse [by asserting] that affirmative action causes stigma.” 4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1925, the Indiana Law Journal is a general-interest academic legal journal. The Indiana Law Journal is published quarterly by students of the Indiana University Maurer School of Law — Bloomington. The opportunity to become a member of the Journal is available to all students at the end of their first-year. Members are selected in one of two ways. First, students in the top of their class academically are automatically invited to become members. Second, a blind-graded writing competition is held to fill the remaining slots. This competition tests students" Bluebook skills and legal writing ability. Overall, approximately thirty-five offers are extended each year. Candidates who accept their offers make a two-year commitment to the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Ordinary Causation: A Study in Experimental Statutory Interpretation Leave Bad Enough Alone A Dangerous Concoction: Pharmaceutical Marketing, Cognitive Biases, and First Amendment Overprotection Hands on the Wheel: A Call for Greater Regulation of Semi-Autonomous Cars The Fragile Menagerie: Biodiversity Loss, Climate Change, and the Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1