测量森林景观的分形维数

May Yuan, David R. Perault
{"title":"测量森林景观的分形维数","authors":"May Yuan,&nbsp;David R. Perault","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6319(199822)2:2<131::AID-AGS4>3.0.CO;2-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines ambiguities in fractal analysis, a popular technique in landscape ecology used to quantify spatial patterns by computing the average shape complexity of patches. These ambiguities may arise depending on whether analysis is based on individual patches or on the entire landscape, and whether topographic influences are considered. Using data from the Olympic National Forest, Washington, annual fractal dimensions are examined for old-growth forest from 1900 to 1990. The conventional fractal measure of landscape structure is compared with results from both patch- and landscape-based analyses. In addition, topographic effects on fractal assessments are evaluated. Results show that the approach analyzing a landscape, in its entirety, may be a promising indicator for the structural complexity of landscape fragmentation, whereas topography appears insignificant to landscape fractal analysis. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":100107,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geographic Studies","volume":"2 2","pages":"131-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6319(199822)2:2<131::AID-AGS4>3.0.CO;2-2","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the fractal dimensions of a temporal forest landscape\",\"authors\":\"May Yuan,&nbsp;David R. Perault\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6319(199822)2:2<131::AID-AGS4>3.0.CO;2-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study examines ambiguities in fractal analysis, a popular technique in landscape ecology used to quantify spatial patterns by computing the average shape complexity of patches. These ambiguities may arise depending on whether analysis is based on individual patches or on the entire landscape, and whether topographic influences are considered. Using data from the Olympic National Forest, Washington, annual fractal dimensions are examined for old-growth forest from 1900 to 1990. The conventional fractal measure of landscape structure is compared with results from both patch- and landscape-based analyses. In addition, topographic effects on fractal assessments are evaluated. Results show that the approach analyzing a landscape, in its entirety, may be a promising indicator for the structural complexity of landscape fragmentation, whereas topography appears insignificant to landscape fractal analysis. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Geographic Studies\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"131-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6319(199822)2:2<131::AID-AGS4>3.0.CO;2-2\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Geographic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6319%28199822%292%3A2%3C131%3A%3AAID-AGS4%3E3.0.CO%3B2-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geographic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6319%28199822%292%3A2%3C131%3A%3AAID-AGS4%3E3.0.CO%3B2-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分形分析是景观生态学中常用的一种方法,通过计算斑块的平均形状复杂度来量化空间格局。这些模糊性的产生取决于分析是基于单个斑块还是整个景观,以及是否考虑了地形的影响。利用来自华盛顿奥林匹克国家森林的数据,研究了1900年至1990年原始森林的年度分形维数。将传统的景观结构分形测度与基于斑块和基于景观的分形分析结果进行了比较。此外,还分析了地形对分形评价的影响。结果表明,景观分形分析方法在整体上可以作为景观破碎化结构复杂性的指标,而地形对景观分形分析的影响较小。©1998 John Wiley &儿子,Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring the fractal dimensions of a temporal forest landscape

This study examines ambiguities in fractal analysis, a popular technique in landscape ecology used to quantify spatial patterns by computing the average shape complexity of patches. These ambiguities may arise depending on whether analysis is based on individual patches or on the entire landscape, and whether topographic influences are considered. Using data from the Olympic National Forest, Washington, annual fractal dimensions are examined for old-growth forest from 1900 to 1990. The conventional fractal measure of landscape structure is compared with results from both patch- and landscape-based analyses. In addition, topographic effects on fractal assessments are evaluated. Results show that the approach analyzing a landscape, in its entirety, may be a promising indicator for the structural complexity of landscape fragmentation, whereas topography appears insignificant to landscape fractal analysis. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automating the environmental impact assessment process: An Implementation Perspective Applied geography antecedents: Marketing geography The equidominance line: A new geopolitical concept Exploring the potential environmental sources and associations of childhood lead poisoning Measuring the fractal dimensions of a temporal forest landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1