信用风险转移:出售或保险

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Derivatives Pub Date : 2014-02-10 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1278087
J. Thompson
{"title":"信用风险转移:出售或保险","authors":"J. Thompson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1278087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes credit risk transfer in banking. Specifically, we model loan sales and loan insurance (e.g. credit default swaps) as the two instruments of risk transfer. Recent empirical evidence suggests that the adverse selection problem is as relevant in loan insurance as it is in loan sales. Contrary to previous literature, this paper allows for informational asymmetries in both markets. We show how credit risk transfer can achieve optimal investment and minimize the social costs associated with excess risk taking by a bank. Furthermore, we find that no separation of loan types can occur in equilibrium. Our results show that a well capitalized bank will tend to use loan insurance regardless of loan quality in the presence of moral hazard and relationship banking costs of loan sales. Finally, we show that a poorly capitalized bank may be forced into the loan sales market, even in the presence of possibly significant relationship and moral hazard costs that can depress the selling price.","PeriodicalId":40006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Derivatives","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Credit Risk Transfer: To Sell or to Insure\",\"authors\":\"J. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1278087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes credit risk transfer in banking. Specifically, we model loan sales and loan insurance (e.g. credit default swaps) as the two instruments of risk transfer. Recent empirical evidence suggests that the adverse selection problem is as relevant in loan insurance as it is in loan sales. Contrary to previous literature, this paper allows for informational asymmetries in both markets. We show how credit risk transfer can achieve optimal investment and minimize the social costs associated with excess risk taking by a bank. Furthermore, we find that no separation of loan types can occur in equilibrium. Our results show that a well capitalized bank will tend to use loan insurance regardless of loan quality in the presence of moral hazard and relationship banking costs of loan sales. Finally, we show that a poorly capitalized bank may be forced into the loan sales market, even in the presence of possibly significant relationship and moral hazard costs that can depress the selling price.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Derivatives\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Derivatives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1278087\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Derivatives","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1278087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本文分析了银行信用风险转移问题。具体来说,我们将贷款销售和贷款保险(例如信用违约互换)作为风险转移的两种工具进行建模。最近的经验证据表明,逆向选择问题在贷款保险和贷款销售中同样重要。与以前的文献相反,本文允许两个市场的信息不对称。我们展示了信用风险转移如何实现最优投资,并使银行过度承担风险所带来的社会成本最小化。进一步,我们发现在均衡状态下不可能出现贷款类型的分离。我们的研究结果表明,在存在道德风险和贷款销售关系银行成本的情况下,资本充足的银行倾向于使用贷款保险,而不考虑贷款质量。最后,我们表明,资本不足的银行可能被迫进入贷款销售市场,即使存在可能显著的关系和道德风险成本,可以压低销售价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Credit Risk Transfer: To Sell or to Insure
This paper analyzes credit risk transfer in banking. Specifically, we model loan sales and loan insurance (e.g. credit default swaps) as the two instruments of risk transfer. Recent empirical evidence suggests that the adverse selection problem is as relevant in loan insurance as it is in loan sales. Contrary to previous literature, this paper allows for informational asymmetries in both markets. We show how credit risk transfer can achieve optimal investment and minimize the social costs associated with excess risk taking by a bank. Furthermore, we find that no separation of loan types can occur in equilibrium. Our results show that a well capitalized bank will tend to use loan insurance regardless of loan quality in the presence of moral hazard and relationship banking costs of loan sales. Finally, we show that a poorly capitalized bank may be forced into the loan sales market, even in the presence of possibly significant relationship and moral hazard costs that can depress the selling price.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Derivatives
Journal of Derivatives Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Derivatives (JOD) is the leading analytical journal on derivatives, providing detailed analyses of theoretical models and how they are used in practice. JOD gives you results-oriented analysis and provides full treatment of mathematical and statistical information on derivatives products and techniques. JOD includes articles about: •The latest valuation and hedging models for derivative instruments and securities •New tools and models for financial risk management •How to apply academic derivatives theory and research to real-world problems •Illustration and rigorous analysis of key innovations in derivative securities and derivative markets
期刊最新文献
VIX Option Pricing for Non-Parameter Heston Stochastic Local Volatility Model Beyond Basel 4: Integrating Over-the-Counter Derivatives Risk Capital Requirements Commodity ETF Arbitrage: Futures-Backed versus Physical-Backed ETFs Efficient Implementation of Tree-Based Option Pricing and Hedging Algorithms under GARCH Models Measuring Information Flows in Option Markets: A Relative Entropy Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1