论20世纪30年代苏联远东民众禁止堕胎:在选择自由与国家意识形态之间

A. A. Isaev, А. А. Savchuk
{"title":"论20世纪30年代苏联远东民众禁止堕胎:在选择自由与国家意识形态之间","authors":"A. A. Isaev, А. А. Savchuk","doi":"10.17072/2219-3111-2022-2-133-142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the reaction of the Soviet Far Eastern public on the prohibition of abortionplanned in 1936. In the 1930s, this question became political because the social and economic problems of people (housing and food) which became the side effect of the socialist reforms began to influence the family. By 1936, USSR was almost a totalitarian country. The main feature for all totalitarian countries is the birth control to increase the number of children and replenish demographic losses inthe present orfuture. This control conflicts with the reproductive freedom of women but is represented as an exclusive opportunity given by the state. Before the enactment of the law, it was submitted to the discussion of the Far Eastern people whose reaction was mostly negative because of the living conditions and the absence of contraception. Negative sentiments had both alatent reaction, which manifested itself in private conversations with relatives and colleges, and a public reaction, demonstrated during public appearances. Central and local powers tried to extirpate all the critical moods and negative reactions with different resources including the activation of agitation and propagandistic work with the use of verbal and visual resources. Although the authorities were aware of the reaction, the law was passed. However, it led to a short-time increasing of the childbirth and then its return to the level of 1935 with women’s death because of illegal abortions.","PeriodicalId":41257,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DISCUSSIONS ON THE PROHIBITION OF ABORTION AMONG THE SOVIET FAR EASTERN PUBLIC IN THE 1930s: BETWEEN THE FREEDOM OF CHOICE AND STATE IDEOLOGY\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Isaev, А. А. Savchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.17072/2219-3111-2022-2-133-142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the reaction of the Soviet Far Eastern public on the prohibition of abortionplanned in 1936. In the 1930s, this question became political because the social and economic problems of people (housing and food) which became the side effect of the socialist reforms began to influence the family. By 1936, USSR was almost a totalitarian country. The main feature for all totalitarian countries is the birth control to increase the number of children and replenish demographic losses inthe present orfuture. This control conflicts with the reproductive freedom of women but is represented as an exclusive opportunity given by the state. Before the enactment of the law, it was submitted to the discussion of the Far Eastern people whose reaction was mostly negative because of the living conditions and the absence of contraception. Negative sentiments had both alatent reaction, which manifested itself in private conversations with relatives and colleges, and a public reaction, demonstrated during public appearances. Central and local powers tried to extirpate all the critical moods and negative reactions with different resources including the activation of agitation and propagandistic work with the use of verbal and visual resources. Although the authorities were aware of the reaction, the law was passed. However, it led to a short-time increasing of the childbirth and then its return to the level of 1935 with women’s death because of illegal abortions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2022-2-133-142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2022-2-133-142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是关于苏联远东公众对1936年禁止堕胎计划的反应。在20世纪30年代,这个问题变成了政治问题,因为人们的社会和经济问题(住房和食物)成为社会主义改革的副作用,开始影响家庭。到1936年,苏联几乎是一个极权主义国家。所有极权主义国家的主要特征是控制生育,以增加儿童数量,并在现在或未来补充人口损失。这种控制与妇女的生育自由相冲突,但却表现为国家给予的独家机会。在法律颁布之前,它被提交给远东人民讨论,由于生活条件和缺乏避孕措施,他们的反应大多是消极的。消极情绪既有潜在的反应,表现在与亲戚和大学的私下谈话中,也有公开的反应,表现在公开露面中。中央和地方当局试图通过各种手段来消除所有的批评情绪和负面反应,包括通过语言和视觉手段激活鼓动和宣传工作。尽管当局知道这种反应,但法律还是通过了。然而,这导致了短暂的生育增长,然后又回到了1935年的水平,妇女因非法堕胎而死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DISCUSSIONS ON THE PROHIBITION OF ABORTION AMONG THE SOVIET FAR EASTERN PUBLIC IN THE 1930s: BETWEEN THE FREEDOM OF CHOICE AND STATE IDEOLOGY
The article is devoted to the reaction of the Soviet Far Eastern public on the prohibition of abortionplanned in 1936. In the 1930s, this question became political because the social and economic problems of people (housing and food) which became the side effect of the socialist reforms began to influence the family. By 1936, USSR was almost a totalitarian country. The main feature for all totalitarian countries is the birth control to increase the number of children and replenish demographic losses inthe present orfuture. This control conflicts with the reproductive freedom of women but is represented as an exclusive opportunity given by the state. Before the enactment of the law, it was submitted to the discussion of the Far Eastern people whose reaction was mostly negative because of the living conditions and the absence of contraception. Negative sentiments had both alatent reaction, which manifested itself in private conversations with relatives and colleges, and a public reaction, demonstrated during public appearances. Central and local powers tried to extirpate all the critical moods and negative reactions with different resources including the activation of agitation and propagandistic work with the use of verbal and visual resources. Although the authorities were aware of the reaction, the law was passed. However, it led to a short-time increasing of the childbirth and then its return to the level of 1935 with women’s death because of illegal abortions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
«СОЦИАЛДЫК ПАТОЛОГИЯ» ТҮШҮНҮГҮНҮН ЖАНА ФОРМАЛАРЫНЫН ИЗИЛДЕНИШИ ААЛАМДАШУУ ШАРТЫНДА КЫРГЫЗСТАНДЫКТАРДЫН ЖАРАНДЫК ИДЕНТТҮҮЛҮГҮ: УЧУРДАГЫ АБАЛЫ ЖАНА БАГЫТТАРЫ КЫРГЫЗСТАНДАГЫ ОРУС ЧИРКӨӨСҮНҮН ТАРЫХЫ ЖАНА БҮГҮНКҮ КҮНДӨГҮ АБАЛЫ (АКСЫ РАЙОНУНУН ЖЕРГЕ-ТАЛ АЙЫЛЫНЫН МИСАЛЫНДА) ОТРАЖЕНИЕ ИСТОРИИ ХЛОПКОВОДСТВА В АРХИВАХ ТОРГОВЫХ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЙ ТУРКЕСТАНСКОГО КРАЯ (НА ПРИМЕРЕ КОЛОНИАЛЬНОГО ПЕРИОДА) ЭГЕМЕНДҮҮЛҮК ЖЫЛДАРЫНДА КЫРГЫЗСТАНДЫН «ЛЕГЕНДАРЛУУ» ПАРЛАМЕНТИНИН – ЖОГОРКУ КЕҢЕШИНИН КАЛЫПТАНЫШЫ ЖАНА АНЫН МАМЛЕКЕТТИК-УКУКТУК РОЛУ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1