S. Fraga, S. Oliveira, G. Pereira, P. Beekman, M. Rippe, C. Kleverlaan
{"title":"陶瓷表面处理后使用的硅酮披露材料降低了粘合强度。","authors":"S. Fraga, S. Oliveira, G. Pereira, P. Beekman, M. Rippe, C. Kleverlaan","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.a37358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of a silicone disclosing procedure performed at different timepoints on the shear bond strength (SBS) of cements (self-adhesive composite cement, self-etch composite cement, resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement) to different substrates (zirconia, lithium disilicate, bovine dentin). MATERIALS AND METHODS The substrate/cement combinations were assigned to two groups (n = 15) according to the timepoint, at which the vinyl polyether silicone disclosing agent was applied: after (experimental groups, EXP) or before (control groups, CTRL) specific micromechanical treatments of the substrate surface. To increase standardization, the cements were applied into rubber rings (2.2 mm diameter x 1.0 mm thickness) positioned on the substrate surface. After luting procedures, all specimens were stored in 37°C distilled water for 24 h, then subjected to SBS testing using a wire loop of 0.2 mm diameter at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. Failure analysis was performed for all tested specimens. SBS data were submitted to Weibull analysis. RESULTS The silicone disclosing procedure performed after micromechanical surface treatment reduced the characteristic shear bond strength to zirconia and lithium disilicate when compared to CTRL. However, for dentin specimens, there was no significant difference between CTRL and EXP for any of the cements investigated. Failure analysis showed a predominance of interfacial failures. CONCLUSION The silicone disclosing procedure performed after the micromechanical treatment of ceramic surfaces negatively affected the cement bond strength. Therefore, after using it to check the fit of a prosthesis, clinicians should carefully clean the ceramic surface.","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":"51 1","pages":"545-554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silicone Disclosing Material used after Ceramic Surface Treatment Reduces Bond Strength.\",\"authors\":\"S. Fraga, S. Oliveira, G. Pereira, P. Beekman, M. Rippe, C. Kleverlaan\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.jad.a37358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of a silicone disclosing procedure performed at different timepoints on the shear bond strength (SBS) of cements (self-adhesive composite cement, self-etch composite cement, resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement) to different substrates (zirconia, lithium disilicate, bovine dentin). MATERIALS AND METHODS The substrate/cement combinations were assigned to two groups (n = 15) according to the timepoint, at which the vinyl polyether silicone disclosing agent was applied: after (experimental groups, EXP) or before (control groups, CTRL) specific micromechanical treatments of the substrate surface. To increase standardization, the cements were applied into rubber rings (2.2 mm diameter x 1.0 mm thickness) positioned on the substrate surface. After luting procedures, all specimens were stored in 37°C distilled water for 24 h, then subjected to SBS testing using a wire loop of 0.2 mm diameter at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. Failure analysis was performed for all tested specimens. SBS data were submitted to Weibull analysis. RESULTS The silicone disclosing procedure performed after micromechanical surface treatment reduced the characteristic shear bond strength to zirconia and lithium disilicate when compared to CTRL. However, for dentin specimens, there was no significant difference between CTRL and EXP for any of the cements investigated. Failure analysis showed a predominance of interfacial failures. CONCLUSION The silicone disclosing procedure performed after the micromechanical treatment of ceramic surfaces negatively affected the cement bond strength. Therefore, after using it to check the fit of a prosthesis, clinicians should carefully clean the ceramic surface.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of adhesive dentistry\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"545-554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of adhesive dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a37358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a37358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的评价不同时间点硅胶暴露对胶结剂(自粘复合胶结剂、自蚀刻复合胶结剂、树脂增强玻璃离子胶结剂)与不同基质(氧化锆、二硅酸锂、牛牙本质)剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响。材料与方法将基材/水泥组合根据使用乙烯基聚醚硅酮揭露剂的时间点分为两组(n = 15):在基材表面进行特定微力学处理之后(实验组,EXP)或之前(对照组,CTRL)。为了提高标准化,将水泥应用于位于基板表面的橡胶圈(直径2.2 mm x厚度1.0 mm)中。处理完毕后,将所有标本在37℃蒸馏水中保存24 h,然后用0.2 mm直径的钢丝环以1 mm/min的十字速度进行SBS测试,直至失效。对所有试样进行失效分析。SBS数据提交Weibull分析。结果微机械表面处理后的硅酮揭露程序与CTRL相比,降低了氧化锆和二硅酸锂的特征剪切结合强度。然而,对于牙本质标本,对于所调查的任何胶结物,CTRL和EXP之间没有显着差异。失效分析显示界面失效占主导地位。结论对陶瓷表面进行微机械处理后进行硅酮揭露会对水泥粘结强度产生负面影响。因此,临床医生在使用它检查假体的配合度后,应仔细清洁陶瓷表面。
Silicone Disclosing Material used after Ceramic Surface Treatment Reduces Bond Strength.
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of a silicone disclosing procedure performed at different timepoints on the shear bond strength (SBS) of cements (self-adhesive composite cement, self-etch composite cement, resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement) to different substrates (zirconia, lithium disilicate, bovine dentin). MATERIALS AND METHODS The substrate/cement combinations were assigned to two groups (n = 15) according to the timepoint, at which the vinyl polyether silicone disclosing agent was applied: after (experimental groups, EXP) or before (control groups, CTRL) specific micromechanical treatments of the substrate surface. To increase standardization, the cements were applied into rubber rings (2.2 mm diameter x 1.0 mm thickness) positioned on the substrate surface. After luting procedures, all specimens were stored in 37°C distilled water for 24 h, then subjected to SBS testing using a wire loop of 0.2 mm diameter at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. Failure analysis was performed for all tested specimens. SBS data were submitted to Weibull analysis. RESULTS The silicone disclosing procedure performed after micromechanical surface treatment reduced the characteristic shear bond strength to zirconia and lithium disilicate when compared to CTRL. However, for dentin specimens, there was no significant difference between CTRL and EXP for any of the cements investigated. Failure analysis showed a predominance of interfacial failures. CONCLUSION The silicone disclosing procedure performed after the micromechanical treatment of ceramic surfaces negatively affected the cement bond strength. Therefore, after using it to check the fit of a prosthesis, clinicians should carefully clean the ceramic surface.