“我们被击落了!”:地球观测卫星、数据监视和NASA 1982年的全球宜居性倡议

IF 1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY History and Technology Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/07341512.2021.1989127
Jenifer Barton
{"title":"“我们被击落了!”:地球观测卫星、数据监视和NASA 1982年的全球宜居性倡议","authors":"Jenifer Barton","doi":"10.1080/07341512.2021.1989127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT At a United Nations space conference in 1982, NASA officials unveiled Global Habitability, an Earth science initiative to study the physical, chemical, and biological processes of the world’s lands, oceans, and atmosphere as a single, integrated system using a fleet of Earth observing satellites. A peaceful and timely initiative that focused on global environmental problems and invited international participation, US officials fully anticipated that it would be favourably received. However, the international response to Global Habitability was not merely unfavourable but openly hostile, leading to the initiative’s failure and its almost total obscurity today. This paper explores the history of this unsuccessful initiative to launch a global Earth science research program. Global Habitability was the product of a small group of US scientists who failed to grasp the inherently political nature of data and the importance of the geopolitical context of the 1970s and early 1980s for a scientific and technological research program.","PeriodicalId":45996,"journal":{"name":"History and Technology","volume":"50 1","pages":"355 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘We were shot down!’: Earth observing satellites, data surveillance, and NASA’s 1982 Global Habitability initiative\",\"authors\":\"Jenifer Barton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07341512.2021.1989127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT At a United Nations space conference in 1982, NASA officials unveiled Global Habitability, an Earth science initiative to study the physical, chemical, and biological processes of the world’s lands, oceans, and atmosphere as a single, integrated system using a fleet of Earth observing satellites. A peaceful and timely initiative that focused on global environmental problems and invited international participation, US officials fully anticipated that it would be favourably received. However, the international response to Global Habitability was not merely unfavourable but openly hostile, leading to the initiative’s failure and its almost total obscurity today. This paper explores the history of this unsuccessful initiative to launch a global Earth science research program. Global Habitability was the product of a small group of US scientists who failed to grasp the inherently political nature of data and the importance of the geopolitical context of the 1970s and early 1980s for a scientific and technological research program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History and Technology\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"355 - 378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2021.1989127\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2021.1989127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在1982年的联合国空间会议上,美国宇航局官员公布了全球可居住性,这是一项地球科学倡议,旨在利用地球观测卫星舰队将世界陆地、海洋和大气的物理、化学和生物过程作为一个单一的综合系统进行研究。这是一项和平而及时的倡议,关注全球环境问题,并邀请国际社会参与,美国官员充分预料到它会受到欢迎。然而,国际上对全球可居住性的反应不仅是不赞成,而且是公开的敌对,导致了该倡议的失败,今天几乎完全默默无闻。本文探讨了这一发起全球地球科学研究计划的失败的历史。全球宜居性是一小群美国科学家的产物,他们没有把握数据的内在政治性质,也没有把握20世纪70年代和80年代初地缘政治背景对科学和技术研究计划的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘We were shot down!’: Earth observing satellites, data surveillance, and NASA’s 1982 Global Habitability initiative
ABSTRACT At a United Nations space conference in 1982, NASA officials unveiled Global Habitability, an Earth science initiative to study the physical, chemical, and biological processes of the world’s lands, oceans, and atmosphere as a single, integrated system using a fleet of Earth observing satellites. A peaceful and timely initiative that focused on global environmental problems and invited international participation, US officials fully anticipated that it would be favourably received. However, the international response to Global Habitability was not merely unfavourable but openly hostile, leading to the initiative’s failure and its almost total obscurity today. This paper explores the history of this unsuccessful initiative to launch a global Earth science research program. Global Habitability was the product of a small group of US scientists who failed to grasp the inherently political nature of data and the importance of the geopolitical context of the 1970s and early 1980s for a scientific and technological research program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: History and Technology serves as an international forum for research on technology in history. A guiding premise is that technology—as knowledge, practice, and material resource—has been a key site for constituting the human experience. In the modern era, it becomes central to our understanding of the making and transformation of societies and cultures, on a local or transnational scale. The journal welcomes historical contributions on any aspect of technology but encourages research that addresses this wider frame through commensurate analytic and critical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Hegemony, co-production and the American Empire: essays in honor of John Krige About the Cover Striking the empire back: Dr. Strangelove and the global histories of technology Botanical surveying, nation-building and American empire: the US quest for a Philippine flora, 1903–1925 How the United States learned to commodify the transnational atom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1