放射肿瘤学质量保证系统的开发:一家大学医院 12 年的经验。

IF 1.3 1区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Synthese Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-26 DOI:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_39_22
Wannapha Nobnop, Vicharn Lorvidhaya, Somsak Wanwilairat, Anirut Watcharawipha, Ekkasit Tharavichitkul, Wimrak Onchan, Somvilai Chakrabandhu, Pitchayaponne Klunklin, Bongkot Jia-Mahasap, Pooriwat Muangwong, Imjai Chitapanarux
{"title":"放射肿瘤学质量保证系统的开发:一家大学医院 12 年的经验。","authors":"Wannapha Nobnop, Vicharn Lorvidhaya, Somsak Wanwilairat, Anirut Watcharawipha, Ekkasit Tharavichitkul, Wimrak Onchan, Somvilai Chakrabandhu, Pitchayaponne Klunklin, Bongkot Jia-Mahasap, Pooriwat Muangwong, Imjai Chitapanarux","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_39_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to report 12 years of experience in the development of a quality assurance system in radiation oncology in a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We developed the Quality Assurance Program in Radiation Oncology (QUAPRO) in 2008 to detect treatment deviation in the radiotherapy (RT) process with three steps of near-miss detection: simulation and prescription (primary check, PC), treatment planning (secondary check, SC), and treatment delivery process (tertiary check, TC). We transferred our paper-based medical records to electronic-based radiotherapy information systems (RTISs) in 2013. QUAPRO was completely integrated into RTIS in 2017. Since then, electronic-based incident reporting has been conducted. The program is called the Radiation Incident Learning System (RILS). The near-miss rates were compared during the three time periods: 2008-2012, 2013-2017, and 2017-2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five years of paper-based QUAPRO for 2008-2012 demonstrated a fluctuation in the checking ratio, with a gradually increasing rate of near misses of 3.5-19.7%. After electronic-based medical records were developed in 2013, the results revealed a dramatic increase from a rate of 2.7 to 4.2 in the number of checks per patient and achieved an increased rate of near misses of 24.7% for PC, SC, and TC. The rate of near misses gradually decreased to 5.3% after 2017 because of RT workflow improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis of 12 years in near-miss data reflected the effectiveness of our quality assurance program. The QUAPRO system can detect near-miss incidents in the whole RT workflow and illustrate the detection improvement when integrated into electronic-based medical records. Regular feedback and exploration of near-miss reporting are recommended for proper RT workflow improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"186 1","pages":"1975-1981"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a quality assurance system in radiation oncology: A 12-year experience in a University Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Wannapha Nobnop, Vicharn Lorvidhaya, Somsak Wanwilairat, Anirut Watcharawipha, Ekkasit Tharavichitkul, Wimrak Onchan, Somvilai Chakrabandhu, Pitchayaponne Klunklin, Bongkot Jia-Mahasap, Pooriwat Muangwong, Imjai Chitapanarux\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_39_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to report 12 years of experience in the development of a quality assurance system in radiation oncology in a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We developed the Quality Assurance Program in Radiation Oncology (QUAPRO) in 2008 to detect treatment deviation in the radiotherapy (RT) process with three steps of near-miss detection: simulation and prescription (primary check, PC), treatment planning (secondary check, SC), and treatment delivery process (tertiary check, TC). We transferred our paper-based medical records to electronic-based radiotherapy information systems (RTISs) in 2013. QUAPRO was completely integrated into RTIS in 2017. Since then, electronic-based incident reporting has been conducted. The program is called the Radiation Incident Learning System (RILS). The near-miss rates were compared during the three time periods: 2008-2012, 2013-2017, and 2017-2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five years of paper-based QUAPRO for 2008-2012 demonstrated a fluctuation in the checking ratio, with a gradually increasing rate of near misses of 3.5-19.7%. After electronic-based medical records were developed in 2013, the results revealed a dramatic increase from a rate of 2.7 to 4.2 in the number of checks per patient and achieved an increased rate of near misses of 24.7% for PC, SC, and TC. The rate of near misses gradually decreased to 5.3% after 2017 because of RT workflow improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis of 12 years in near-miss data reflected the effectiveness of our quality assurance program. The QUAPRO system can detect near-miss incidents in the whole RT workflow and illustrate the detection improvement when integrated into electronic-based medical records. Regular feedback and exploration of near-miss reporting are recommended for proper RT workflow improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Synthese\",\"volume\":\"186 1\",\"pages\":\"1975-1981\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Synthese\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_39_22\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synthese","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_39_22","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在报告一家大学医院开发放射肿瘤学质量保证系统的 12 年经验:我们于 2008 年制定了放射肿瘤学质量保证计划(QUAPRO),通过模拟和处方(一级检查,PC)、治疗计划(二级检查,SC)和治疗实施过程(三级检查,TC)三个步骤来检测放射治疗(RT)过程中的治疗偏差。2013 年,我们将纸质医疗记录转移到电子放射治疗信息系统(RTIS)。QUAPRO 于 2017 年完全集成到 RTIS 中。从那时起,我们开始进行基于电子的事故报告。该计划被称为辐射事故学习系统(RILS)。对 2008-2012 年、2013-2017 年和 2017-2020 年这三个时间段的险情发生率进行了比较:2008-2012年五年的纸质QUAPRO显示出检查率的波动,近失误率逐渐上升,为3.5%-19.7%。2013 年开发出电子病历后,结果显示每位患者的检查次数从 2.7 次急剧增加到 4.2 次,PC、SC 和 TC 的近失率增加了 24.7%。由于 RT 工作流程的改进,2017 年后近失率逐渐降至 5.3%:12年的近失误数据分析反映了我们质量保证计划的有效性。QUAPRO系统可以检测整个RT工作流程中的近失误事件,并说明在与电子病历整合后,检测效果有所改善。建议定期反馈和探索近错报告,以适当改进 RT 工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a quality assurance system in radiation oncology: A 12-year experience in a University Hospital.

Purpose: This study aimed to report 12 years of experience in the development of a quality assurance system in radiation oncology in a university hospital.

Material and methods: We developed the Quality Assurance Program in Radiation Oncology (QUAPRO) in 2008 to detect treatment deviation in the radiotherapy (RT) process with three steps of near-miss detection: simulation and prescription (primary check, PC), treatment planning (secondary check, SC), and treatment delivery process (tertiary check, TC). We transferred our paper-based medical records to electronic-based radiotherapy information systems (RTISs) in 2013. QUAPRO was completely integrated into RTIS in 2017. Since then, electronic-based incident reporting has been conducted. The program is called the Radiation Incident Learning System (RILS). The near-miss rates were compared during the three time periods: 2008-2012, 2013-2017, and 2017-2020.

Results: Five years of paper-based QUAPRO for 2008-2012 demonstrated a fluctuation in the checking ratio, with a gradually increasing rate of near misses of 3.5-19.7%. After electronic-based medical records were developed in 2013, the results revealed a dramatic increase from a rate of 2.7 to 4.2 in the number of checks per patient and achieved an increased rate of near misses of 24.7% for PC, SC, and TC. The rate of near misses gradually decreased to 5.3% after 2017 because of RT workflow improvement.

Conclusion: The analysis of 12 years in near-miss data reflected the effectiveness of our quality assurance program. The QUAPRO system can detect near-miss incidents in the whole RT workflow and illustrate the detection improvement when integrated into electronic-based medical records. Regular feedback and exploration of near-miss reporting are recommended for proper RT workflow improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Synthese
Synthese 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Synthese is a philosophy journal focusing on contemporary issues in epistemology, philosophy of science, and related fields. More specifically, we divide our areas of interest into four groups: (1) epistemology, methodology, and philosophy of science, all broadly understood. (2) The foundations of logic and mathematics, where ‘logic’, ‘mathematics’, and ‘foundations’ are all broadly understood. (3) Formal methods in philosophy, including methods connecting philosophy to other academic fields. (4) Issues in ethics and the history and sociology of logic, mathematics, and science that contribute to the contemporary studies Synthese focuses on, as described in (1)-(3) above.
期刊最新文献
The hybrid account of activities The once and always possible Psychophysical neutrality and its descendants: a brief primer for dual-aspect monism Definite totalities and determinate truth in conceptual structuralism A naturalist approach to social ontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1