性别平等市场化:一个历史的视角

Q4 Social Sciences Socialism and Democracy Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/08854300.2021.2103905
Kevin T. Sharp
{"title":"性别平等市场化:一个历史的视角","authors":"Kevin T. Sharp","doi":"10.1080/08854300.2021.2103905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender relations in post-Soviet Russia and other former Soviet Republics have undergone a marked shift since the early 20th century. Both democratization and neoliberal market reform since the collapse of the USSR have entailed a pronounced social and political reconfiguration concerning gender equality, largely guided by a Western capitalistic market logic. Indeed, the transition from Socialist legality to Capitalist legality has fundamentally altered the sociopolitical and sociocultural fabric of post-Soviet nation states. Contemporary feminist engagements with such new forms of governance and culture in the post-Soviet framework have had various implications for the current state of gender equality, in both regressive and progressive terms. Evolving from a socialist gender parity model originally cultivated by the Bolshevik Party in the early 20th century to a neoliberal, individualistic feminist model today, gender equality in post-Soviet Russia as well as the former Soviet Union (FSU) has undergone deep social, political, and economic transformations. Specifically, there has been a noticeable shift from “state feminism” to “market feminism,” resulting in the normalization of market privilege and the subordinate status of feminist agendas. But it has also resulted in, as Kantola and Squires note, the “emergence of new, flexible institutions pursuing gender equality” and a heightened feminist influence in the labor market (2012). While this “state” to “market” shift in feminist agendas has been a prevalent trend in most Western democracies paralleled by the rise of neoliberalism, in post-Soviet Russia and the FSU it has been particularly revealing of the socially regressive aspects of neoliberal market reform. In contrast to the optimistic theories regarding the fall of communism in the late 20th Century (Modernization Theory, Fukuyama’s “End of History” Thesis, etc.), it seems that the neoliberal, democratic restructuring of Russia and the Eastern Bloc Socialism and Democracy, 2021 Vol. 35, Nos. 2–3, 149–166, https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2103905","PeriodicalId":40061,"journal":{"name":"Socialism and Democracy","volume":"190 1","pages":"149 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Marketization of Gender Equality: A Historical Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Kevin T. Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08854300.2021.2103905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gender relations in post-Soviet Russia and other former Soviet Republics have undergone a marked shift since the early 20th century. Both democratization and neoliberal market reform since the collapse of the USSR have entailed a pronounced social and political reconfiguration concerning gender equality, largely guided by a Western capitalistic market logic. Indeed, the transition from Socialist legality to Capitalist legality has fundamentally altered the sociopolitical and sociocultural fabric of post-Soviet nation states. Contemporary feminist engagements with such new forms of governance and culture in the post-Soviet framework have had various implications for the current state of gender equality, in both regressive and progressive terms. Evolving from a socialist gender parity model originally cultivated by the Bolshevik Party in the early 20th century to a neoliberal, individualistic feminist model today, gender equality in post-Soviet Russia as well as the former Soviet Union (FSU) has undergone deep social, political, and economic transformations. Specifically, there has been a noticeable shift from “state feminism” to “market feminism,” resulting in the normalization of market privilege and the subordinate status of feminist agendas. But it has also resulted in, as Kantola and Squires note, the “emergence of new, flexible institutions pursuing gender equality” and a heightened feminist influence in the labor market (2012). While this “state” to “market” shift in feminist agendas has been a prevalent trend in most Western democracies paralleled by the rise of neoliberalism, in post-Soviet Russia and the FSU it has been particularly revealing of the socially regressive aspects of neoliberal market reform. In contrast to the optimistic theories regarding the fall of communism in the late 20th Century (Modernization Theory, Fukuyama’s “End of History” Thesis, etc.), it seems that the neoliberal, democratic restructuring of Russia and the Eastern Bloc Socialism and Democracy, 2021 Vol. 35, Nos. 2–3, 149–166, https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2103905\",\"PeriodicalId\":40061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"volume\":\"190 1\",\"pages\":\"149 - 166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2103905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialism and Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2103905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪初以来,后苏联时代的俄罗斯和其他前苏联加盟共和国的性别关系发生了显著变化。自苏联解体以来的民主化和新自由主义市场改革,在很大程度上受到西方资本主义市场逻辑的指导,都带来了关于性别平等的明显的社会和政治重构。的确,从社会主义法制向资本主义法制的转变从根本上改变了后苏联民族国家的社会政治和社会文化结构。当代女权主义者在后苏联框架下与这种新形式的治理和文化的接触,对当前的性别平等状况产生了各种各样的影响,既有倒退的,也有进步的。从20世纪初布尔什维克党最初培养的社会主义性别平等模式演变为今天的新自由主义,个人主义女权主义模式,后苏联时期的俄罗斯以及前苏联(FSU)的性别平等经历了深刻的社会,政治和经济变革。具体而言,从“国家女权主义”到“市场女权主义”的转变十分明显,导致市场特权正常化,女权主义议程处于从属地位。但正如坎托拉和斯奎尔斯所指出的那样,这也导致了“追求性别平等的新的、灵活的机构的出现”,以及女性主义在劳动力市场上的影响力的增强(2012)。随着新自由主义的兴起,女权主义议程中的“国家”向“市场”的转变在大多数西方民主国家已经成为一种普遍趋势,而在后苏联时期的俄罗斯和前苏联,这种转变尤其揭示了新自由主义市场改革的社会倒退方面。与20世纪后期关于共产主义垮台的乐观理论(现代化理论,福山的“历史的终结”论文等)相反,似乎俄罗斯和东方集团的新自由主义民主重组社会主义与民主,2021年第35卷,第2-3期,149-166,https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2103905
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Marketization of Gender Equality: A Historical Perspective
Gender relations in post-Soviet Russia and other former Soviet Republics have undergone a marked shift since the early 20th century. Both democratization and neoliberal market reform since the collapse of the USSR have entailed a pronounced social and political reconfiguration concerning gender equality, largely guided by a Western capitalistic market logic. Indeed, the transition from Socialist legality to Capitalist legality has fundamentally altered the sociopolitical and sociocultural fabric of post-Soviet nation states. Contemporary feminist engagements with such new forms of governance and culture in the post-Soviet framework have had various implications for the current state of gender equality, in both regressive and progressive terms. Evolving from a socialist gender parity model originally cultivated by the Bolshevik Party in the early 20th century to a neoliberal, individualistic feminist model today, gender equality in post-Soviet Russia as well as the former Soviet Union (FSU) has undergone deep social, political, and economic transformations. Specifically, there has been a noticeable shift from “state feminism” to “market feminism,” resulting in the normalization of market privilege and the subordinate status of feminist agendas. But it has also resulted in, as Kantola and Squires note, the “emergence of new, flexible institutions pursuing gender equality” and a heightened feminist influence in the labor market (2012). While this “state” to “market” shift in feminist agendas has been a prevalent trend in most Western democracies paralleled by the rise of neoliberalism, in post-Soviet Russia and the FSU it has been particularly revealing of the socially regressive aspects of neoliberal market reform. In contrast to the optimistic theories regarding the fall of communism in the late 20th Century (Modernization Theory, Fukuyama’s “End of History” Thesis, etc.), it seems that the neoliberal, democratic restructuring of Russia and the Eastern Bloc Socialism and Democracy, 2021 Vol. 35, Nos. 2–3, 149–166, https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2103905
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Socialism and Democracy
Socialism and Democracy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Socialism and Democracy is committed to showing the continuing relevance of socialist politics and vision. Socialism and Democracy brings together the worlds of scholarship and activism, theory and practice, to examine in depth the core issues and popular movements of our time. The perspective is broadly Marxist, encouraging not only critique of the status quo, but also informed analysis of the many different approaches to bringing about fundamental change, and seeking to integrate issues of race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and nationality with the traditional focus on class. Articles reflect many disciplines; our geographical scope is global; authors include activists and independent scholars as well as academics.
期刊最新文献
Communism, Poetry: Communicating Vessels (Some Insubordinate Essays, 1999–2018)Darko Suvin, Communism, Poetry: Communicating Vessels (Some Insubordinate Essays, 1999–2018) (Toronto: Political Animal Press, 2020, 280 pp., $29.99) The Old Mole and the New Democratic Party: Why the NDP is an Impediment to Social Progress in Canada On N. K. Jemisin and Speculative Fiction as a Liberatory Space The Impact of Censorship on COVID-19 Policy Formation in the United States Tracing Homelands: Israel, Palestine, and the Claims of BelongingLinda Dittmar, Tracing Homelands: Israel, Palestine, and the Claims of Belonging (Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press, 2023, 240 pp., $20)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1