{"title":"阿马斯广场的新殖民主义改革。1901-1952年利马的城市现代化和建筑遗产","authors":"Horacio Ramos","doi":"10.18800/HISTORICA.201601.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay illustrates how the debates surrounding the neo-colonial redevelopment of Lima’s Plaza de Armas (1940-1952) altered perceptions of the city’s urban modernization and architectural heritage. Analyzing projects dating back to the turn of the 20th century reveals that the redevelopment was part of a series of urban interventions involving the destruction of architectural heritage and the construction of major avenues and buildings. The promoters of functionalism criticized the redevelopment, causing this type of urban intervention and the neo-colonial style as «anachronistic».","PeriodicalId":88251,"journal":{"name":"Historica","volume":"35 1","pages":"102-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La reforma neocolonial de la plaza de Armas. Modernización urbana y patrimonio arquitectónico en Lima, 1901-1952\",\"authors\":\"Horacio Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.18800/HISTORICA.201601.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay illustrates how the debates surrounding the neo-colonial redevelopment of Lima’s Plaza de Armas (1940-1952) altered perceptions of the city’s urban modernization and architectural heritage. Analyzing projects dating back to the turn of the 20th century reveals that the redevelopment was part of a series of urban interventions involving the destruction of architectural heritage and the construction of major avenues and buildings. The promoters of functionalism criticized the redevelopment, causing this type of urban intervention and the neo-colonial style as «anachronistic».\",\"PeriodicalId\":88251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historica\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"102-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18800/HISTORICA.201601.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/HISTORICA.201601.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
La reforma neocolonial de la plaza de Armas. Modernización urbana y patrimonio arquitectónico en Lima, 1901-1952
This essay illustrates how the debates surrounding the neo-colonial redevelopment of Lima’s Plaza de Armas (1940-1952) altered perceptions of the city’s urban modernization and architectural heritage. Analyzing projects dating back to the turn of the 20th century reveals that the redevelopment was part of a series of urban interventions involving the destruction of architectural heritage and the construction of major avenues and buildings. The promoters of functionalism criticized the redevelopment, causing this type of urban intervention and the neo-colonial style as «anachronistic».
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
