如何?《确定条约目标和宗旨的方法指南》

Kit De Vriese
{"title":"如何?《确定条约目标和宗旨的方法指南》","authors":"Kit De Vriese","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nNone of the principles of treaty interpretation is so often invoked and at the same time so shrouded in mystery as the treaty’s object and purpose. Following the International Court of Justice, several scholars have tried to determine common (interpretive) principles to identify the object and purpose of a particular treaty. However, even the most “demystifying” accounts of treaty interpretation have not been able to clarify the concept. The few accounts that did try to identify such principles arrived back at the start of their journey, replacing veils rather than removing them. The result is the now widely accepted and proclaimed yet circular proposition that “the object and purpose of a treaty (provision) is determined in light of all its provisions as a whole”. This article identifies some clear(er) principles, which can be used by academics and practitioners. It argues that the concept is less open-ended than commonly assumed.","PeriodicalId":42613,"journal":{"name":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to?: A Methodological Guide to Identify a Treaty’s Object and Purpose\",\"authors\":\"Kit De Vriese\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718034-12341465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nNone of the principles of treaty interpretation is so often invoked and at the same time so shrouded in mystery as the treaty’s object and purpose. Following the International Court of Justice, several scholars have tried to determine common (interpretive) principles to identify the object and purpose of a particular treaty. However, even the most “demystifying” accounts of treaty interpretation have not been able to clarify the concept. The few accounts that did try to identify such principles arrived back at the start of their journey, replacing veils rather than removing them. The result is the now widely accepted and proclaimed yet circular proposition that “the object and purpose of a treaty (provision) is determined in light of all its provisions as a whole”. This article identifies some clear(er) principles, which can be used by academics and practitioners. It argues that the concept is less open-ended than commonly assumed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

没有任何一项条约解释原则像条约的目标和宗旨那样经常被援引,同时又如此神秘。继国际法院之后,一些学者试图确定共同(解释性)原则,以确定特定条约的目的和宗旨。然而,即使是对条约解释最“去神秘化”的解释也未能澄清这一概念。少数几个试图确定这些原则的报道回到了他们旅程的起点,更换了面纱,而不是摘下面纱。其结果是现在被广泛接受和宣布的循环命题,即“条约(条款)的目标和宗旨是根据其所有条款作为一个整体来确定的”。本文确定了一些清晰的(er)原则,可供学者和实践者使用。它认为,这个概念并不像人们通常认为的那样开放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How to?: A Methodological Guide to Identify a Treaty’s Object and Purpose
None of the principles of treaty interpretation is so often invoked and at the same time so shrouded in mystery as the treaty’s object and purpose. Following the International Court of Justice, several scholars have tried to determine common (interpretive) principles to identify the object and purpose of a particular treaty. However, even the most “demystifying” accounts of treaty interpretation have not been able to clarify the concept. The few accounts that did try to identify such principles arrived back at the start of their journey, replacing veils rather than removing them. The result is the now widely accepted and proclaimed yet circular proposition that “the object and purpose of a treaty (provision) is determined in light of all its provisions as a whole”. This article identifies some clear(er) principles, which can be used by academics and practitioners. It argues that the concept is less open-ended than commonly assumed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals is firmly established as the leading journal in its field. Each issue will give you the latest developments with respect to the preparation, adoption, suspension, amendment and revision of Rules of Procedure as well as statutory and internal rules and other related matters. The Journal will also provide you with the latest practice with respect to the interpretation and application of rules of procedure and constitutional documents, which can be found in judgments, advisory opinions, written and oral pleadings as well as legal literature.
期刊最新文献
Situating “Deformalization” within the International Court of Justice: Understanding Institutionalised Informality The World Is Burning, Urgently and Irreparably – a Plea for Interim Protection against Climatic Change at the ICJ “Cross Treaty Interpretation” en bloc or How CAFTA-DR Tribunals Are Systematically Interpreting the FET Standard Based on NAFTA Case Law The Asian Turn in Foreign Investment, edited by Mahdev Mohan and Chester Brown Not Just a Participation Trophy? Advancing Public Interests through Advisory Opinions at the International Court of Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1