{"title":"一期与二期人工晶状体植入术治疗外伤性白内障的临床疗效比较","authors":"T. Peng, Dandan Yu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2020.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the clinical efficacy between Ⅰ and Ⅱ phase IOL implantation for the treatment of traumatic cataract. \n \n \nMethods \nFifty patients of monocular traumatic cataract from Jan. 2016 to Jan. 2018 in Zhejiang Armed Police Corps Hospital were selected.All cases were randomly divided into two groups.There were Ⅰ phase IOL implantation group of 28 cases and Ⅱ phase IOL implantation group of 22 cases.The efficacy of the two groups was compared. \n \n \nResults \nOne month after operation, the visual acuity of the two groups were significantly better than that before operation (P 0.05). One month after operation, the incidence of corneal edema, uveitis, posterior synechia and secondary glaucoma in II stage group were lower than that in I stage group (P<0.05). One year after operation, the anterior chamber depth and scores of tear film rupture time in Ⅱ phase group were higher than those in Ⅰ phase group (P<0.05), and the intraocular pressure and scores of corneal fluorescence staining were lower than those in Ⅰ phase group (P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nIOL implantation, the complication rate of the Ⅱ phase of traumatic cataract for the treatment is lower and the long-term effect is better. \n \n \nKey words: \nCataract, traumatic; Implantation, lens, intraocular; Efficacy, clinical","PeriodicalId":10126,"journal":{"name":"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志","volume":"20 1","pages":"7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of clinical efficacy between I phase and II phase intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of traumatic cataract\",\"authors\":\"T. Peng, Dandan Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2020.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the clinical efficacy between Ⅰ and Ⅱ phase IOL implantation for the treatment of traumatic cataract. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFifty patients of monocular traumatic cataract from Jan. 2016 to Jan. 2018 in Zhejiang Armed Police Corps Hospital were selected.All cases were randomly divided into two groups.There were Ⅰ phase IOL implantation group of 28 cases and Ⅱ phase IOL implantation group of 22 cases.The efficacy of the two groups was compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nOne month after operation, the visual acuity of the two groups were significantly better than that before operation (P 0.05). One month after operation, the incidence of corneal edema, uveitis, posterior synechia and secondary glaucoma in II stage group were lower than that in I stage group (P<0.05). One year after operation, the anterior chamber depth and scores of tear film rupture time in Ⅱ phase group were higher than those in Ⅰ phase group (P<0.05), and the intraocular pressure and scores of corneal fluorescence staining were lower than those in Ⅰ phase group (P<0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nIOL implantation, the complication rate of the Ⅱ phase of traumatic cataract for the treatment is lower and the long-term effect is better. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nCataract, traumatic; Implantation, lens, intraocular; Efficacy, clinical\",\"PeriodicalId\":10126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"7-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2020.01.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2020.01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of clinical efficacy between I phase and II phase intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of traumatic cataract
Objective
To compare the clinical efficacy between Ⅰ and Ⅱ phase IOL implantation for the treatment of traumatic cataract.
Methods
Fifty patients of monocular traumatic cataract from Jan. 2016 to Jan. 2018 in Zhejiang Armed Police Corps Hospital were selected.All cases were randomly divided into two groups.There were Ⅰ phase IOL implantation group of 28 cases and Ⅱ phase IOL implantation group of 22 cases.The efficacy of the two groups was compared.
Results
One month after operation, the visual acuity of the two groups were significantly better than that before operation (P 0.05). One month after operation, the incidence of corneal edema, uveitis, posterior synechia and secondary glaucoma in II stage group were lower than that in I stage group (P<0.05). One year after operation, the anterior chamber depth and scores of tear film rupture time in Ⅱ phase group were higher than those in Ⅰ phase group (P<0.05), and the intraocular pressure and scores of corneal fluorescence staining were lower than those in Ⅰ phase group (P<0.05).
Conclusion
IOL implantation, the complication rate of the Ⅱ phase of traumatic cataract for the treatment is lower and the long-term effect is better.
Key words:
Cataract, traumatic; Implantation, lens, intraocular; Efficacy, clinical
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
