Ahmed Embaby, A. Fathy, Mohammad Al-Akkad, A. Baraka, Haitham Elsheikh
{"title":"青少年和青年急性髓性白血病的预后:单中心经验","authors":"Ahmed Embaby, A. Fathy, Mohammad Al-Akkad, A. Baraka, Haitham Elsheikh","doi":"10.18535/IJETST/V7I3.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nIntroduction: Little is known about the outcomes of Adolescent and young adults (AYAs); aged 15-39 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) worldwide, so, we evaluated the clinical characteristics, response to therapy, and survival outcomes of these patients. \nPatients and Methods: In this observational prospective cohort study, we investigated 64 AYA AML patients, divided by their age at diagnosis into two groups, (AYA 16-29 years) and (AYA 30-39 years); including 26 and 20 patients, respectively. Patient and disease characteristics, in addition to treatment and survival outcomes, were analyzed using statistical package for social science software version 24 \nResults: The median age of the whole group was 29 years, with male-to-female ratio 1.3. The most common FAB subtypes were M2 and M4, 30.4% (for each subtype). Normal karyotyping represented the most frequent cytogenetic risk group (65.2%). An intensive induction therapy was given to most patients (82.6%) and a significant difference was found between the 2 patient groups regarding karyotyping and intensive induction therapy, P-value <0.001 and 0.048, respectively. \nThe complete remission rate was (65.2%) and the relapse rate was 40.0% which was significantly higher in the (AYA 16-29 year) group, P<0.001. \nThe 3-Year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate was 23.6% and was significantly better within the (AYA 30-39 years) group, p-value = 0.002. While there was no significant difference in overall survival rates. \nConclusion: AYA patients constitute a unique subset of patients with AML with an improved prognosis especially those aged from 30-39 years, who had better LFS and lower relapse rates. \nKeywords: Adolescent and young adults (AYAs), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), survival, prognosis.","PeriodicalId":13970,"journal":{"name":"International journal of emerging trends in science and technology","volume":"6 1","pages":"6888-6894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of Adolescents and Young Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Experience\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Embaby, A. Fathy, Mohammad Al-Akkad, A. Baraka, Haitham Elsheikh\",\"doi\":\"10.18535/IJETST/V7I3.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nIntroduction: Little is known about the outcomes of Adolescent and young adults (AYAs); aged 15-39 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) worldwide, so, we evaluated the clinical characteristics, response to therapy, and survival outcomes of these patients. \\nPatients and Methods: In this observational prospective cohort study, we investigated 64 AYA AML patients, divided by their age at diagnosis into two groups, (AYA 16-29 years) and (AYA 30-39 years); including 26 and 20 patients, respectively. Patient and disease characteristics, in addition to treatment and survival outcomes, were analyzed using statistical package for social science software version 24 \\nResults: The median age of the whole group was 29 years, with male-to-female ratio 1.3. The most common FAB subtypes were M2 and M4, 30.4% (for each subtype). Normal karyotyping represented the most frequent cytogenetic risk group (65.2%). An intensive induction therapy was given to most patients (82.6%) and a significant difference was found between the 2 patient groups regarding karyotyping and intensive induction therapy, P-value <0.001 and 0.048, respectively. \\nThe complete remission rate was (65.2%) and the relapse rate was 40.0% which was significantly higher in the (AYA 16-29 year) group, P<0.001. \\nThe 3-Year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate was 23.6% and was significantly better within the (AYA 30-39 years) group, p-value = 0.002. While there was no significant difference in overall survival rates. \\nConclusion: AYA patients constitute a unique subset of patients with AML with an improved prognosis especially those aged from 30-39 years, who had better LFS and lower relapse rates. \\nKeywords: Adolescent and young adults (AYAs), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), survival, prognosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of emerging trends in science and technology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"6888-6894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of emerging trends in science and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18535/IJETST/V7I3.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of emerging trends in science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18535/IJETST/V7I3.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcome of Adolescents and Young Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Experience
Abstract
Introduction: Little is known about the outcomes of Adolescent and young adults (AYAs); aged 15-39 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) worldwide, so, we evaluated the clinical characteristics, response to therapy, and survival outcomes of these patients.
Patients and Methods: In this observational prospective cohort study, we investigated 64 AYA AML patients, divided by their age at diagnosis into two groups, (AYA 16-29 years) and (AYA 30-39 years); including 26 and 20 patients, respectively. Patient and disease characteristics, in addition to treatment and survival outcomes, were analyzed using statistical package for social science software version 24
Results: The median age of the whole group was 29 years, with male-to-female ratio 1.3. The most common FAB subtypes were M2 and M4, 30.4% (for each subtype). Normal karyotyping represented the most frequent cytogenetic risk group (65.2%). An intensive induction therapy was given to most patients (82.6%) and a significant difference was found between the 2 patient groups regarding karyotyping and intensive induction therapy, P-value <0.001 and 0.048, respectively.
The complete remission rate was (65.2%) and the relapse rate was 40.0% which was significantly higher in the (AYA 16-29 year) group, P<0.001.
The 3-Year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate was 23.6% and was significantly better within the (AYA 30-39 years) group, p-value = 0.002. While there was no significant difference in overall survival rates.
Conclusion: AYA patients constitute a unique subset of patients with AML with an improved prognosis especially those aged from 30-39 years, who had better LFS and lower relapse rates.
Keywords: Adolescent and young adults (AYAs), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), survival, prognosis.