用于去除农产品中物理、化学和微生物残留物的清洁方法的有效性

Barry Michaels, Vidhya Gangar, Herb Schattenberg, Matthew Blevins, Troy Ayers
{"title":"用于去除农产品中物理、化学和微生物残留物的清洁方法的有效性","authors":"Barry Michaels,&nbsp;Vidhya Gangar,&nbsp;Herb Schattenberg,&nbsp;Matthew Blevins,&nbsp;Troy Ayers","doi":"10.1046/j.1471-5740.2003.00063.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An increasing number of disease outbreaks have been associated with produce, while pesticide levels continue to be a safety concern. With increased health awareness, fresh produce consumption has increased. As there is a need for microbial and pesticide removal intervention measures of proven efficacy to maintain confidence in food service produce preparation, a series of experiments were undertaken. Produce cleaning methods were tested by measuring removal of gross dirt, wax and environmental contaminants present on produce surface. Tests were performed on apples, cucumbers and lemons using water wash, produce brush, produce cleaner, produce cleaner with paper towel wipe, and water wash and paper towel wipe. Water rinse and paper towel dry was found superior to all other methods tested. Apples contaminated with a cocktail of pesticides were tested in waxed and unwaxed state. Following cleaning by various methods, including produce wash and produce brush, pesticides on skins were extracted and analyzed to determine concentrations of organophosphorous and organochlorine pesticides. In these experiments, it was shown that any treatment that included wiping with paper towels showed increased effectiveness over similar treatments or controls. Microbial efficacy experiments were performed involving 21 different types of laboratory inoculated produce. Two types of inoculum were employed, Tryptone Soya broth (TSB) and ground beef. After inoculation, produce was cleaned by dry wiping with paper towel, using water wash air dry, water wash paper towel dry or dipped in 200 p.p.m. chlorine dip for either 5 s or 1 min and compared to baseline values. One-minute dip in 200 p.p.m. chlorine solution was more effective than rinsing and drying with a paper towel when TSB inoculum was used (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The effectiveness of the 200 p.p.m. chlorine dip diminished if ground beef was used as a test inoculum, with water rinse and paper towel providing significantly (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) improved results. The efficacy shown by paper towels usage in this diverse set of experiments is based on frictional removal of offending soils.</p>","PeriodicalId":100547,"journal":{"name":"Food Service Technology","volume":"3 1","pages":"9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1471-5740.2003.00063.x","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of cleaning methodologies used for removal of physical, chemical and microbiological residues from produce\",\"authors\":\"Barry Michaels,&nbsp;Vidhya Gangar,&nbsp;Herb Schattenberg,&nbsp;Matthew Blevins,&nbsp;Troy Ayers\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1471-5740.2003.00063.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>An increasing number of disease outbreaks have been associated with produce, while pesticide levels continue to be a safety concern. With increased health awareness, fresh produce consumption has increased. As there is a need for microbial and pesticide removal intervention measures of proven efficacy to maintain confidence in food service produce preparation, a series of experiments were undertaken. Produce cleaning methods were tested by measuring removal of gross dirt, wax and environmental contaminants present on produce surface. Tests were performed on apples, cucumbers and lemons using water wash, produce brush, produce cleaner, produce cleaner with paper towel wipe, and water wash and paper towel wipe. Water rinse and paper towel dry was found superior to all other methods tested. Apples contaminated with a cocktail of pesticides were tested in waxed and unwaxed state. Following cleaning by various methods, including produce wash and produce brush, pesticides on skins were extracted and analyzed to determine concentrations of organophosphorous and organochlorine pesticides. In these experiments, it was shown that any treatment that included wiping with paper towels showed increased effectiveness over similar treatments or controls. Microbial efficacy experiments were performed involving 21 different types of laboratory inoculated produce. Two types of inoculum were employed, Tryptone Soya broth (TSB) and ground beef. After inoculation, produce was cleaned by dry wiping with paper towel, using water wash air dry, water wash paper towel dry or dipped in 200 p.p.m. chlorine dip for either 5 s or 1 min and compared to baseline values. One-minute dip in 200 p.p.m. chlorine solution was more effective than rinsing and drying with a paper towel when TSB inoculum was used (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The effectiveness of the 200 p.p.m. chlorine dip diminished if ground beef was used as a test inoculum, with water rinse and paper towel providing significantly (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) improved results. The efficacy shown by paper towels usage in this diverse set of experiments is based on frictional removal of offending soils.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Service Technology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"9-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1471-5740.2003.00063.x\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Service Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1471-5740.2003.00063.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Service Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1471-5740.2003.00063.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

越来越多的疾病爆发与农产品有关,而农药水平仍然是一个安全问题。随着健康意识的增强,新鲜农产品的消费量也在增加。由于需要有效的微生物和农药去除干预措施,以保持对食品服务产品制备的信心,因此进行了一系列实验。通过测量农产品表面的毛污垢、蜡和环境污染物的去除,测试了农产品清洁方法。对苹果、黄瓜和柠檬进行了试验,分别使用水冲洗、生产刷、生产清洁剂、生产清洁剂用纸巾擦拭、水冲洗和纸巾擦拭。发现水冲洗和纸巾干燥优于所有其他测试方法。被混合杀虫剂污染的苹果在打蜡和未打蜡状态下进行了测试。通过各种清洁方法,包括农产品清洗和农产品刷,提取和分析皮肤上的农药,以确定有机磷和有机氯农药的浓度。在这些实验中,研究表明,任何包括用纸巾擦拭的治疗方法都比类似的治疗方法或对照组效果更好。对21种不同类型的实验室接种农产品进行了微生物功效试验。采用两种接种剂,色氨酸豆汤(TSB)和碎牛肉。接种后,用纸巾擦干,用水洗风干,用水洗纸巾擦干或蘸200 p.m。氯浸泡5秒或1分钟,并与基线值进行比较。在下午2点浸泡1分钟。使用TSB接种时,氯溶液比用纸巾冲洗和干燥更有效(P < 0.05)。下午2点的有效性。以碎牛肉作为试验接种物,氯浸渍减少,用水冲洗和纸巾显著改善(P < 0.05)结果。在这组不同的实验中,使用纸巾的功效是基于摩擦去除有害土壤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of cleaning methodologies used for removal of physical, chemical and microbiological residues from produce

An increasing number of disease outbreaks have been associated with produce, while pesticide levels continue to be a safety concern. With increased health awareness, fresh produce consumption has increased. As there is a need for microbial and pesticide removal intervention measures of proven efficacy to maintain confidence in food service produce preparation, a series of experiments were undertaken. Produce cleaning methods were tested by measuring removal of gross dirt, wax and environmental contaminants present on produce surface. Tests were performed on apples, cucumbers and lemons using water wash, produce brush, produce cleaner, produce cleaner with paper towel wipe, and water wash and paper towel wipe. Water rinse and paper towel dry was found superior to all other methods tested. Apples contaminated with a cocktail of pesticides were tested in waxed and unwaxed state. Following cleaning by various methods, including produce wash and produce brush, pesticides on skins were extracted and analyzed to determine concentrations of organophosphorous and organochlorine pesticides. In these experiments, it was shown that any treatment that included wiping with paper towels showed increased effectiveness over similar treatments or controls. Microbial efficacy experiments were performed involving 21 different types of laboratory inoculated produce. Two types of inoculum were employed, Tryptone Soya broth (TSB) and ground beef. After inoculation, produce was cleaned by dry wiping with paper towel, using water wash air dry, water wash paper towel dry or dipped in 200 p.p.m. chlorine dip for either 5 s or 1 min and compared to baseline values. One-minute dip in 200 p.p.m. chlorine solution was more effective than rinsing and drying with a paper towel when TSB inoculum was used (P < 0.05). The effectiveness of the 200 p.p.m. chlorine dip diminished if ground beef was used as a test inoculum, with water rinse and paper towel providing significantly (P < 0.05) improved results. The efficacy shown by paper towels usage in this diverse set of experiments is based on frictional removal of offending soils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Letter To The Editor Editorial Reply Reply Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1