选择性曝光:产品评估门户网站的访问者是否以有偏见的方式选择评论?

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace Pub Date : 2021-02-16 DOI:10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4547
Kevin Winter, Birka Zapf, Mandy Hütter, Nicolas Tichy, K. Sassenberg
{"title":"选择性曝光:产品评估门户网站的访问者是否以有偏见的方式选择评论?","authors":"Kevin Winter, Birka Zapf, Mandy Hütter, Nicolas Tichy, K. Sassenberg","doi":"10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most people in industrialized countries regularly purchase products online. Consumers often rely on previous customers’ reviews to make purchasing decisions. The current research investigates whether potential online customers select these reviews in a biased way and whether typical interface properties of product evaluation portals foster biased selection. Based on selective exposure research, potential online customers should have a bias towards selecting positive reviews when they have an initial preference for a product. We tested this prediction across five studies (total N = 1376) while manipulating several typical properties of the review selection interface that should – according to earlier findings – facilitate biased selection. Across all studies, we found some evidence for a bias in favor of selecting positive reviews, but the aggregated effect was non-significant in an internal meta-analysis. Contrary to our hypothesis and not replicating previous research, none of the interface properties that were assumed to increase biased selection led to the predicted effects. Overall, the current research suggests that biased information selection, which has regularly been found in many other contexts, only plays a minor role in online review selection. Thus, there is no need to fear that product evaluation portals elicit biased impressions about products among consumers due to selective exposure.","PeriodicalId":46651,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective exposure in action: Do visitors of product evaluation portals select reviews in a biased manner?\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Winter, Birka Zapf, Mandy Hütter, Nicolas Tichy, K. Sassenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most people in industrialized countries regularly purchase products online. Consumers often rely on previous customers’ reviews to make purchasing decisions. The current research investigates whether potential online customers select these reviews in a biased way and whether typical interface properties of product evaluation portals foster biased selection. Based on selective exposure research, potential online customers should have a bias towards selecting positive reviews when they have an initial preference for a product. We tested this prediction across five studies (total N = 1376) while manipulating several typical properties of the review selection interface that should – according to earlier findings – facilitate biased selection. Across all studies, we found some evidence for a bias in favor of selecting positive reviews, but the aggregated effect was non-significant in an internal meta-analysis. Contrary to our hypothesis and not replicating previous research, none of the interface properties that were assumed to increase biased selection led to the predicted effects. Overall, the current research suggests that biased information selection, which has regularly been found in many other contexts, only plays a minor role in online review selection. Thus, there is no need to fear that product evaluation portals elicit biased impressions about products among consumers due to selective exposure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4547\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4547","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数工业化国家的人经常在网上购买产品。消费者经常依靠以前顾客的评论来做出购买决定。目前的研究调查了潜在的在线客户是否以有偏见的方式选择这些评论,以及产品评估门户的典型界面属性是否助长了有偏见的选择。基于选择性曝光研究,当潜在的在线客户对产品有最初的偏好时,他们应该倾向于选择积极的评论。我们在五项研究(总N = 1376)中测试了这一预测,同时操纵了审查选择界面的几个典型属性,根据早期的发现,这些属性应该有助于偏见选择。在所有的研究中,我们发现了一些偏向于选择积极评价的证据,但在内部荟萃分析中,总体效应不显著。与我们的假设相反,没有复制以前的研究,没有一个被认为会增加偏差选择的界面属性导致预测的效果。总的来说,目前的研究表明,在许多其他情况下经常发现的有偏见的信息选择在在线评论选择中只起着很小的作用。因此,无需担心产品评价门户网站会因选择性曝光而引起消费者对产品的偏见印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selective exposure in action: Do visitors of product evaluation portals select reviews in a biased manner?
Most people in industrialized countries regularly purchase products online. Consumers often rely on previous customers’ reviews to make purchasing decisions. The current research investigates whether potential online customers select these reviews in a biased way and whether typical interface properties of product evaluation portals foster biased selection. Based on selective exposure research, potential online customers should have a bias towards selecting positive reviews when they have an initial preference for a product. We tested this prediction across five studies (total N = 1376) while manipulating several typical properties of the review selection interface that should – according to earlier findings – facilitate biased selection. Across all studies, we found some evidence for a bias in favor of selecting positive reviews, but the aggregated effect was non-significant in an internal meta-analysis. Contrary to our hypothesis and not replicating previous research, none of the interface properties that were assumed to increase biased selection led to the predicted effects. Overall, the current research suggests that biased information selection, which has regularly been found in many other contexts, only plays a minor role in online review selection. Thus, there is no need to fear that product evaluation portals elicit biased impressions about products among consumers due to selective exposure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between preference for online social interaction and affective well-being via compulsive dating app use: The moderating role of algorithmic beliefs The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study Online pornography use and sexual satisfaction in association with relationship satisfaction among middle-aged and older people Facebook, social comparison and happiness: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment User experience of mixed reality applications for healthy ageing: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1