前南斯拉夫的社会运动和批评话语:结构方法

IF 0.2 N/A PHILOSOPHY Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.2298/fid2102296b
Filip Balunović
{"title":"前南斯拉夫的社会运动和批评话语:结构方法","authors":"Filip Balunović","doi":"10.2298/fid2102296b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until a decade ago, a comprehensive contestation of the so-called\n ?transitional? paradigm was largely missing in the post-socialist era. This\n reality changed in the last ten years, especially in the region of former\n Yugoslavia. Some social movements in this region have started questioning\n the very essence of the economic and social misconceptions of the\n post-socialist condition. This paper first provides an elaboration of the\n very conceptual edifice of the ruling paradigm (hence the object of the\n critique of the three social movements in question), as well as a\n theoretical and methodological framework. It goes on to map out the\n epistemic discursive content of the respective social movements in Belgrade,\n Zagreb and Sarajevo, thereby assessing the conceptual content of their\n critique of the post-socialist transitional paradigm. Finally, given the\n similarities between Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the paper\n seeks to explain variations in the critique by how the structural and\n contextual features impact the perspective from which it is constructed.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social movements and critical discourses in former Yugoslavia: Structural approach\",\"authors\":\"Filip Balunović\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/fid2102296b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Until a decade ago, a comprehensive contestation of the so-called\\n ?transitional? paradigm was largely missing in the post-socialist era. This\\n reality changed in the last ten years, especially in the region of former\\n Yugoslavia. Some social movements in this region have started questioning\\n the very essence of the economic and social misconceptions of the\\n post-socialist condition. This paper first provides an elaboration of the\\n very conceptual edifice of the ruling paradigm (hence the object of the\\n critique of the three social movements in question), as well as a\\n theoretical and methodological framework. It goes on to map out the\\n epistemic discursive content of the respective social movements in Belgrade,\\n Zagreb and Sarajevo, thereby assessing the conceptual content of their\\n critique of the post-socialist transitional paradigm. Finally, given the\\n similarities between Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the paper\\n seeks to explain variations in the critique by how the structural and\\n contextual features impact the perspective from which it is constructed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2102296b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2102296b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

直到十年前,一场关于所谓“过渡性”的全面争论才结束。在后社会主义时代,范式在很大程度上缺失了。这一现实在过去十年中发生了变化,特别是在前南斯拉夫地区。该地区的一些社会运动已经开始质疑对后社会主义条件的经济和社会误解的本质。本文首先提供了统治范式的概念大厦的阐述(因此是讨论中的三个社会运动的批判对象),以及理论和方法框架。接着,它描绘了贝尔格莱德、萨格勒布和萨拉热窝各自社会运动的认识论话语内容,从而评估了他们对后社会主义过渡范式的批判的概念内容。最后,鉴于塞尔维亚、克罗地亚和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那之间的相似之处,本文试图通过结构和背景特征如何影响其构建视角来解释批评中的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social movements and critical discourses in former Yugoslavia: Structural approach
Until a decade ago, a comprehensive contestation of the so-called ?transitional? paradigm was largely missing in the post-socialist era. This reality changed in the last ten years, especially in the region of former Yugoslavia. Some social movements in this region have started questioning the very essence of the economic and social misconceptions of the post-socialist condition. This paper first provides an elaboration of the very conceptual edifice of the ruling paradigm (hence the object of the critique of the three social movements in question), as well as a theoretical and methodological framework. It goes on to map out the epistemic discursive content of the respective social movements in Belgrade, Zagreb and Sarajevo, thereby assessing the conceptual content of their critique of the post-socialist transitional paradigm. Finally, given the similarities between Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the paper seeks to explain variations in the critique by how the structural and contextual features impact the perspective from which it is constructed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Women’s education, knowledge and competence in Ancient Greece The role of education in Aristotle’s Politics The roman stoics on the emancipatory potential of the philosophical paideia The writing of existence in the latest work of Alberto Moreiras Recognition as a counter hegemonic strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1