使用逻辑回归和零膨胀负二项模型预测血管造影结果

A. Saki, Fatemeh Rezaei Sharif, A. Taghipour, M. Tajfard
{"title":"使用逻辑回归和零膨胀负二项模型预测血管造影结果","authors":"A. Saki, Fatemeh Rezaei Sharif, A. Taghipour, M. Tajfard","doi":"10.32598/jsmj.21.4.2350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives Angiography is a common and invasive method in diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. Some patients refuse to perform angiography due to reasons such as fear, high cost, and lack of confidence in the decision of physician for angiography. This study aims to determine the factors predicting coronary artery occlusion to predict the outcome of angiography. Subjects and Methods In this cross-sectional study, participants were 1187 patients received angiography in Ghaem Hospital in Mashhad, Iran. Demographic data, lipid profile, blood sugar level, and history of underlying disorders were used in two prediction models of logistic regression and zero-inflated negative binomial (NB), fitted using R3.6.1 software. Then, their sensitivity and specificity were compared. Results Of 1187 patients, 404 (34%) had negative angiography. The results of both models showed that the risk of positive angiography was significantly higher in male and diabetic patients. The risk increased with the increase of age. The area under the ROC curve (sensitivity and specificity) for logistic regression and zero-inflated NB models were 78.4(70.4%, 70.5%) and 78.2(71.4%, 71.5%). Conclusion Age, gender, smoking, and history of diabetes are significant predictors of the angiography outcome. There is no significant difference between logistic regression and zero-inflated NB models in predicting the outcome of angiography. Due to the ease of use of logistic regression model, it can be used to predict the results of angiography.","PeriodicalId":17808,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Angiography Results Using Logistic Regression and Zeroinflated Negative Binomial Models\",\"authors\":\"A. Saki, Fatemeh Rezaei Sharif, A. Taghipour, M. Tajfard\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/jsmj.21.4.2350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives Angiography is a common and invasive method in diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. Some patients refuse to perform angiography due to reasons such as fear, high cost, and lack of confidence in the decision of physician for angiography. This study aims to determine the factors predicting coronary artery occlusion to predict the outcome of angiography. Subjects and Methods In this cross-sectional study, participants were 1187 patients received angiography in Ghaem Hospital in Mashhad, Iran. Demographic data, lipid profile, blood sugar level, and history of underlying disorders were used in two prediction models of logistic regression and zero-inflated negative binomial (NB), fitted using R3.6.1 software. Then, their sensitivity and specificity were compared. Results Of 1187 patients, 404 (34%) had negative angiography. The results of both models showed that the risk of positive angiography was significantly higher in male and diabetic patients. The risk increased with the increase of age. The area under the ROC curve (sensitivity and specificity) for logistic regression and zero-inflated NB models were 78.4(70.4%, 70.5%) and 78.2(71.4%, 71.5%). Conclusion Age, gender, smoking, and history of diabetes are significant predictors of the angiography outcome. There is no significant difference between logistic regression and zero-inflated NB models in predicting the outcome of angiography. Due to the ease of use of logistic regression model, it can be used to predict the results of angiography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jundishapur Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jundishapur Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/jsmj.21.4.2350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jsmj.21.4.2350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的血管造影是诊断心血管疾病的一种常用且具有侵入性的方法。一些患者由于害怕、费用高、对医生的决定缺乏信心等原因而拒绝进行血管造影。本研究旨在确定预测冠状动脉闭塞的因素,以预测血管造影的结果。在这项横断面研究中,参与者是1187名在伊朗马什哈德Ghaem医院接受血管造影的患者。采用人口统计学数据、血脂、血糖水平和基础疾病史,采用logistic回归和零膨胀负二项(NB)预测模型,采用R3.6.1软件进行拟合。然后比较两种方法的敏感性和特异性。结果1187例患者中404例(34%)血管造影阴性。两种模型的结果都表明,男性和糖尿病患者的血管造影阳性风险明显更高。风险随着年龄的增长而增加。logistic回归和零膨胀NB模型的ROC曲线下面积(灵敏度和特异度)分别为78.4(70.4%、70.5%)和78.2(71.4%、71.5%)。结论年龄、性别、吸烟、糖尿病史是影响血管造影结果的重要因素。逻辑回归与零膨胀NB模型在预测血管造影结果方面无显著差异。由于逻辑回归模型的易用性,可以用来预测血管造影的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of Angiography Results Using Logistic Regression and Zeroinflated Negative Binomial Models
Background and Objectives Angiography is a common and invasive method in diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. Some patients refuse to perform angiography due to reasons such as fear, high cost, and lack of confidence in the decision of physician for angiography. This study aims to determine the factors predicting coronary artery occlusion to predict the outcome of angiography. Subjects and Methods In this cross-sectional study, participants were 1187 patients received angiography in Ghaem Hospital in Mashhad, Iran. Demographic data, lipid profile, blood sugar level, and history of underlying disorders were used in two prediction models of logistic regression and zero-inflated negative binomial (NB), fitted using R3.6.1 software. Then, their sensitivity and specificity were compared. Results Of 1187 patients, 404 (34%) had negative angiography. The results of both models showed that the risk of positive angiography was significantly higher in male and diabetic patients. The risk increased with the increase of age. The area under the ROC curve (sensitivity and specificity) for logistic regression and zero-inflated NB models were 78.4(70.4%, 70.5%) and 78.2(71.4%, 71.5%). Conclusion Age, gender, smoking, and history of diabetes are significant predictors of the angiography outcome. There is no significant difference between logistic regression and zero-inflated NB models in predicting the outcome of angiography. Due to the ease of use of logistic regression model, it can be used to predict the results of angiography.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of moderate intensity continuous exercises and nano-curcumin supplementation on sensory-motor disorders in Rats with brain tumors Evaluation of the internal structure of the coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS): A Factor analytic study Prostate Cancer Detection through MR Images based on Black Hole Optimization Algorithm In Silico Structural-based Virtual Screening and Molecular Docking Analysis of Plant-derived Small Molecules for Treatment of COVID-19 Measuring the Empathy of Medical Students in Ahvaz Jundishapuz University of Medical Sciences and Its Relationship With Their Age, Sex, and Religiosity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1