文学课程比较分析的理论基础:国外比较分析方法综述

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI:10.17323/1814-9545-2023-1-246-272
Alexandra Chentsova, Nadezhda Avdeenko
{"title":"文学课程比较分析的理论基础:国外比较分析方法综述","authors":"Alexandra Chentsova, Nadezhda Avdeenko","doi":"10.17323/1814-9545-2023-1-246-272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a lack of evidence-based argumentation in Russian public and academic discussion about teaching literature at school and in comparative studies on literature curriculum in Russia and abroad as well as on ways of its possible reconstruction. In this review paper we represent key theoretical discourses: conservative approach, neoliberal technicist pragmatism, postmodern/ critical perspective, and social realism. We provide examples of how to approach aims and objectives of literature curriculum, school literature canon, teacher and student agency, role of various actors in its construction, conflict between knowledge-based and competence-based approaches. We presume that this theoretical framework may be relevant for in-depth analysis of Russian literature curriculum and suggestions on plausible alternatives in its transformation to overcome its problems and contradictions.","PeriodicalId":54119,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical Foundations for Comparative Analysis of Literature Curricula: A Review of Foreign Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Chentsova, Nadezhda Avdeenko\",\"doi\":\"10.17323/1814-9545-2023-1-246-272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a lack of evidence-based argumentation in Russian public and academic discussion about teaching literature at school and in comparative studies on literature curriculum in Russia and abroad as well as on ways of its possible reconstruction. In this review paper we represent key theoretical discourses: conservative approach, neoliberal technicist pragmatism, postmodern/ critical perspective, and social realism. We provide examples of how to approach aims and objectives of literature curriculum, school literature canon, teacher and student agency, role of various actors in its construction, conflict between knowledge-based and competence-based approaches. We presume that this theoretical framework may be relevant for in-depth analysis of Russian literature curriculum and suggestions on plausible alternatives in its transformation to overcome its problems and contradictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2023-1-246-272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2023-1-246-272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在俄罗斯关于学校文学教学的公众和学术讨论中,在俄罗斯与国外文学课程的比较研究以及可能的重建途径上,缺乏循证论证。在这篇评论文章中,我们代表了关键的理论话语:保守主义方法,新自由主义技术实用主义,后现代/批判视角和社会现实主义。我们提供了如何接近文学课程的目的和目标的例子,学校文学经典,教师和学生的代理,在其建设中的各种行动者的角色,知识和能力为基础的方法之间的冲突。我们认为,这一理论框架可能有助于深入分析俄罗斯文学课程,并在其转型中提出可行的替代方案,以克服其存在的问题和矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theoretical Foundations for Comparative Analysis of Literature Curricula: A Review of Foreign Approaches
There is a lack of evidence-based argumentation in Russian public and academic discussion about teaching literature at school and in comparative studies on literature curriculum in Russia and abroad as well as on ways of its possible reconstruction. In this review paper we represent key theoretical discourses: conservative approach, neoliberal technicist pragmatism, postmodern/ critical perspective, and social realism. We provide examples of how to approach aims and objectives of literature curriculum, school literature canon, teacher and student agency, role of various actors in its construction, conflict between knowledge-based and competence-based approaches. We presume that this theoretical framework may be relevant for in-depth analysis of Russian literature curriculum and suggestions on plausible alternatives in its transformation to overcome its problems and contradictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow
Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Power of Probability in Psychometrics. Review of the book “Bayesian Psychometric Modeling“ The Role of Context in Scenario-Based Tasks for Measuring Universal Skills: The Use of Generalizability Theory Experience of Using Bifactor Models to Reduce the Effects of Social Desirability on the Normative Questionnaire of Universal Competencies Psychometric Research: Modern Methods and New Opportunities for Education Psychometrics and Cognitive Research: Contradictions and Possibility for Cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1