期望和南非土地问题-历史起源和当前的辩论

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY New Contree Pub Date : 2018-07-30 DOI:10.4102/nc.v80i0.78
R. Jankielsohn, A. Duvenhage
{"title":"期望和南非土地问题-历史起源和当前的辩论","authors":"R. Jankielsohn, A. Duvenhage","doi":"10.4102/nc.v80i0.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Land remains a contentious political issue that has the potential for further conflict in South Africa. Expectations over land are a legitimate result of a history of dispossession, displacement and deprivation during the pre-colonial, colonial and Apartheid eras. The importance of placing discussions on land within a historical context is salient. Legitimate perceptions around the slow pace of sustainable land reform since 1994 have left a vacuum for politicians to continue to use the land issue as tool for political mobilisation. However, development programmes that are meant to deliver on the expectations such as the National Development Plan (NDP) and the New Growth Path (NGP) are often undermined by the same politicians. The ideological divisions between the NDR and the NDP/NGP within the ruling African National Congress-run (ANC) government hamper progress towards achieving the land redistribution objectives outlined in these development plans and programmes. The dilemma that this creates is that factors required to mitigate this problem such as an emphasis on sustainability of redistributed land for increased food security have fallen victim to this ideological tug-of-war. The widening gap between the politically fuelled expectations trajectory on the one hand, and the inability to meet these expectations by current development programmes on the other, are sources of increasing social conflict in society.","PeriodicalId":52000,"journal":{"name":"New Contree","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expectations and the issue of land in South Africa – the historical origins and current debate\",\"authors\":\"R. Jankielsohn, A. Duvenhage\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/nc.v80i0.78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Land remains a contentious political issue that has the potential for further conflict in South Africa. Expectations over land are a legitimate result of a history of dispossession, displacement and deprivation during the pre-colonial, colonial and Apartheid eras. The importance of placing discussions on land within a historical context is salient. Legitimate perceptions around the slow pace of sustainable land reform since 1994 have left a vacuum for politicians to continue to use the land issue as tool for political mobilisation. However, development programmes that are meant to deliver on the expectations such as the National Development Plan (NDP) and the New Growth Path (NGP) are often undermined by the same politicians. The ideological divisions between the NDR and the NDP/NGP within the ruling African National Congress-run (ANC) government hamper progress towards achieving the land redistribution objectives outlined in these development plans and programmes. The dilemma that this creates is that factors required to mitigate this problem such as an emphasis on sustainability of redistributed land for increased food security have fallen victim to this ideological tug-of-war. The widening gap between the politically fuelled expectations trajectory on the one hand, and the inability to meet these expectations by current development programmes on the other, are sources of increasing social conflict in society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Contree\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Contree\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/nc.v80i0.78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Contree","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/nc.v80i0.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

土地仍然是一个有争议的政治问题,有可能在南非引发进一步的冲突。对土地的期望是殖民前、殖民时期和种族隔离时期的剥夺、流离失所和剥夺历史的合理结果。在历史背景下讨论土地问题的重要性是显而易见的。自1994年以来,围绕可持续土地改革步伐缓慢的合理看法,给政治家留下了继续利用土地问题作为政治动员工具的真空。然而,旨在实现预期的发展计划,如国家发展计划(NDP)和新增长路径(NGP),往往受到同一批政客的破坏。在执政的非洲人国民大会(ANC)政府内部,民族民主运动和民族民主党/民族gp之间的意识形态分歧阻碍了在实现这些发展计划和方案中概述的土地再分配目标方面取得进展。这造成的困境是,缓解这一问题所需的因素,如强调土地再分配的可持续性以增加粮食安全,已经成为这种意识形态拉锯战的牺牲品。一方面是政治推动的期望轨迹,另一方面是目前的发展方案无法满足这些期望,两者之间的差距越来越大,这是社会中日益增加的社会冲突的根源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expectations and the issue of land in South Africa – the historical origins and current debate
Land remains a contentious political issue that has the potential for further conflict in South Africa. Expectations over land are a legitimate result of a history of dispossession, displacement and deprivation during the pre-colonial, colonial and Apartheid eras. The importance of placing discussions on land within a historical context is salient. Legitimate perceptions around the slow pace of sustainable land reform since 1994 have left a vacuum for politicians to continue to use the land issue as tool for political mobilisation. However, development programmes that are meant to deliver on the expectations such as the National Development Plan (NDP) and the New Growth Path (NGP) are often undermined by the same politicians. The ideological divisions between the NDR and the NDP/NGP within the ruling African National Congress-run (ANC) government hamper progress towards achieving the land redistribution objectives outlined in these development plans and programmes. The dilemma that this creates is that factors required to mitigate this problem such as an emphasis on sustainability of redistributed land for increased food security have fallen victim to this ideological tug-of-war. The widening gap between the politically fuelled expectations trajectory on the one hand, and the inability to meet these expectations by current development programmes on the other, are sources of increasing social conflict in society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Contree
New Contree HISTORY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of CASSAS in the liberation struggle of the southern African region, 1976 to the early 1980s The waning fortunes of traditional leadership in South Africa: From pre-colonial to apartheid periods The place of the Bulhoek massacre in South African history From the Editor-in-Chief’s Desk From the Editor-in-Chief’s Desk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1