期刊的演变编辑政策2.0

Bioscience hypotheses Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bihy.2009.02.001

William Bains

{"title":"期刊的演变编辑政策2.0","authors":"William Bains","doi":"10.1016/j.bihy.2009.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Papers submitted to <em>Bioscience Hypotheses</em> should be innovative, clear, compatible with at least most of the facts, and testable. Not all good, new, challenging ideas manage these exacting standards. Editorial policy has been altered to include both an increased role for peer advice and an occasional role for editorial advice to authors to bring out the ideas in a form that I think most likely to attract interest from our readership.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87894,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience hypotheses","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 57-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bihy.2009.02.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of a Journal. Editorial Policy 2.0\",\"authors\":\"William Bains\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bihy.2009.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Papers submitted to <em>Bioscience Hypotheses</em> should be innovative, clear, compatible with at least most of the facts, and testable. Not all good, new, challenging ideas manage these exacting standards. Editorial policy has been altered to include both an increased role for peer advice and an occasional role for editorial advice to authors to bring out the ideas in a form that I think most likely to attract interest from our readership.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioscience hypotheses\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 57-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bihy.2009.02.001\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioscience hypotheses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756239209000196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756239209000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

提交给生物科学假设的论文应该是创新的，清晰的，至少与大多数事实相一致的，并且是可测试的。并不是所有好的、新的、具有挑战性的想法都能达到这些严格的标准。编辑政策已经改变，既增加了同行建议的作用，也偶尔为作者提供编辑建议，以一种我认为最有可能吸引读者兴趣的形式提出想法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Evolution of a Journal. Editorial Policy 2.0

Papers submitted to Bioscience Hypotheses should be innovative, clear, compatible with at least most of the facts, and testable. Not all good, new, challenging ideas manage these exacting standards. Editorial policy has been altered to include both an increased role for peer advice and an occasional role for editorial advice to authors to bring out the ideas in a form that I think most likely to attract interest from our readership.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Bioscience hypotheses

自引率

0.00%

发文量