根据动物法律制度的演变,对体育公司动物运动员的福利保护。

Q2 Social Sciences Derecho Animal Pub Date : 2019-01-20 DOI:10.5565/REV/DA.404
Marine Lercier
{"title":"根据动物法律制度的演变,对体育公司动物运动员的福利保护。","authors":"Marine Lercier","doi":"10.5565/REV/DA.404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neither Labor Law nor Civil Law has yet drawn the legal consequences of the existence of labor relations that unite animals and man. There are no rules protecting animals at work, while their participation in multiple human activities is unequivocal. The use of horses in sports and tourism generates wealth, while the services they provide save or improve lives. While it is easy to \"work with animals\", it is true that it is never explicitly recognized that animals \"work with people\". Why? Because animals are subject to the legal regime of property. The case of an animal as versatile as the horse leads us to believe that after having inspired numerous animal protection laws, his participation in society through work could be the first to be recognized. A service provider, transporter, plow, therapist, athlete... he has many roles and is recruited according to his personal skills and physical, intellectual or emotional abilities that make him unique. The social fact that animal labor represents prompts us to claim the specific protection of animals in this context, in light of the emergence of their fundamental right to welfare and, therefore, not to be mistreated. Being well treated in the workplace should be considered as a right of the working population, not as a specific human right. Likewise, the protection and monitoring of the health of the sportsperson must be an imperative that goes beyond the species to which the athlete belongs. This contribution was presented during the Symposium organized by the ADDCDA (Association des Doctorants et Docteurs du Centre de Droit des Affaires) on 11 October 2018 at the University of Toulouse 1 Capitole, on the theme of Sport and Business Law. It is part of the DER2015-69314-P project financed by MINECO, on the legal status of animals.","PeriodicalId":36357,"journal":{"name":"Derecho Animal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Welfare protection of the animal-athlete in the sports company in light of the evolution of the legal regime for animals.\",\"authors\":\"Marine Lercier\",\"doi\":\"10.5565/REV/DA.404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neither Labor Law nor Civil Law has yet drawn the legal consequences of the existence of labor relations that unite animals and man. There are no rules protecting animals at work, while their participation in multiple human activities is unequivocal. The use of horses in sports and tourism generates wealth, while the services they provide save or improve lives. While it is easy to \\\"work with animals\\\", it is true that it is never explicitly recognized that animals \\\"work with people\\\". Why? Because animals are subject to the legal regime of property. The case of an animal as versatile as the horse leads us to believe that after having inspired numerous animal protection laws, his participation in society through work could be the first to be recognized. A service provider, transporter, plow, therapist, athlete... he has many roles and is recruited according to his personal skills and physical, intellectual or emotional abilities that make him unique. The social fact that animal labor represents prompts us to claim the specific protection of animals in this context, in light of the emergence of their fundamental right to welfare and, therefore, not to be mistreated. Being well treated in the workplace should be considered as a right of the working population, not as a specific human right. Likewise, the protection and monitoring of the health of the sportsperson must be an imperative that goes beyond the species to which the athlete belongs. This contribution was presented during the Symposium organized by the ADDCDA (Association des Doctorants et Docteurs du Centre de Droit des Affaires) on 11 October 2018 at the University of Toulouse 1 Capitole, on the theme of Sport and Business Law. It is part of the DER2015-69314-P project financed by MINECO, on the legal status of animals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Derecho Animal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Derecho Animal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5565/REV/DA.404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho Animal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/REV/DA.404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《劳动法》和《民法》都还没有规定把动物和人结合起来的劳动关系存在的法律后果。没有规则保护动物在工作中,而他们参与多种人类活动是明确的。在体育和旅游中使用马匹可以创造财富,同时它们提供的服务可以挽救或改善生命。虽然“与动物合作”很容易,但确实从来没有人明确认识到动物“与人合作”。为什么?因为动物受制于财产的法律制度。像马这样多才多艺的动物让我们相信,在启发了许多动物保护法之后,他通过工作参与社会可能是第一个得到承认的。服务提供商、运输商、犁、治疗师、运动员……他有许多角色,并根据他的个人技能和身体、智力或情感能力被招募,使他与众不同。动物劳动所代表的社会事实促使我们在这种情况下要求对动物进行具体保护,因为它们享有福利的基本权利,因此不受虐待。在工作场所受到良好待遇应被视为工作人口的一项权利,而不是一项具体的人权。同样,对运动员健康的保护和监测必须是一项超越运动员所属物种的当务之急。这篇论文于2018年10月11日在图卢兹第一大学举办的以体育和商业法为主题的研讨会上发表,该研讨会由ADDCDA(博士和博士协会)主办。这是MINECO资助的关于动物法律地位的DER2015-69314-P项目的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Welfare protection of the animal-athlete in the sports company in light of the evolution of the legal regime for animals.
Neither Labor Law nor Civil Law has yet drawn the legal consequences of the existence of labor relations that unite animals and man. There are no rules protecting animals at work, while their participation in multiple human activities is unequivocal. The use of horses in sports and tourism generates wealth, while the services they provide save or improve lives. While it is easy to "work with animals", it is true that it is never explicitly recognized that animals "work with people". Why? Because animals are subject to the legal regime of property. The case of an animal as versatile as the horse leads us to believe that after having inspired numerous animal protection laws, his participation in society through work could be the first to be recognized. A service provider, transporter, plow, therapist, athlete... he has many roles and is recruited according to his personal skills and physical, intellectual or emotional abilities that make him unique. The social fact that animal labor represents prompts us to claim the specific protection of animals in this context, in light of the emergence of their fundamental right to welfare and, therefore, not to be mistreated. Being well treated in the workplace should be considered as a right of the working population, not as a specific human right. Likewise, the protection and monitoring of the health of the sportsperson must be an imperative that goes beyond the species to which the athlete belongs. This contribution was presented during the Symposium organized by the ADDCDA (Association des Doctorants et Docteurs du Centre de Droit des Affaires) on 11 October 2018 at the University of Toulouse 1 Capitole, on the theme of Sport and Business Law. It is part of the DER2015-69314-P project financed by MINECO, on the legal status of animals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Derecho Animal
Derecho Animal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relaciones de vecindad y tenencia de animales. Reapertura del recurso de protección en la propiedad horizontal chilena Análisis jurídico sobre la concurrencia del ensañamiento en el delito de maltrato animal Estrategias para fortalecer el capital social y su importancia en la solución del conflicto ser humano-fauna urbana en la ciudad de Ibarra, Ecuador Francesc Ristol y Eva Doménec. Terapia Asistida con Animales. Técnicas y Ejercicios para Intervenciones Asistidas con Perros (Barcelona, 2ª ed. 2015) 390p. Reflect on the Past or on the Present? The root cause of the difficulties in advancing animal protection in China. Review of Peter J. Li’s latest work: Animal Welfare in China, Culture, Politics and Crisis, Sydney University Press 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1