数据中心网络的自适应部分拥塞感知负载均衡

Kefei Liu, Jiao Zhang, D. Wei, Kai Zhang, Tao Huang
{"title":"数据中心网络的自适应部分拥塞感知负载均衡","authors":"Kefei Liu, Jiao Zhang, D. Wei, Kai Zhang, Tao Huang","doi":"10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9348059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to accommodate ever-increasing new tenants and applications, datacenter networks (DCNs) require an efficient load balancing scheme to fully utilize their bisection bandwidth. Equal-cost MultiPath routing (ECMP) is a widely used load-balancing mechanism in the DCN. However, ECMP blindly hashes traffic to parallel paths and results in imbalance and collisions. Motivated by ECMP's shortcomings, some recent schemes provide more visibility into networks via active probing. They could be broadly classified as probing all the paths or a fixed number of paths (e.g., 3 paths) each probe interval. However, they all suffer from some limitations. Probing all paths introduces high probing overhead while probing a fixed number of paths is suboptimal when the network topology and traffic load change. To our best knowledge, none of the existing schemes adapt the number of paths being probed to the network conditions. Enlightened by the defects of previous work, we introduce PLB, an adaptive partial congestion-aware load-balancing mechanism. At its heart, PLB randomly probes partial paths each probe interval and the number of them changes according to the network topology and the traffic load. Besides, PLB splits flow into flowlets and makes careful routing/rerouting decisions for them. Through analysis, we formulate the correlations between the number of paths being probed and the network conditions. Furthermore, simulations with realistic workloads validate our conclusions and show that PLB reduces overall flow completion times compared to the state-of-the-art load balancing schemes both in symmetric and asymmetric topologies.","PeriodicalId":12759,"journal":{"name":"GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PLB: Adaptive Partial Congestion-aware Load Balancing for Datacenter Networks\",\"authors\":\"Kefei Liu, Jiao Zhang, D. Wei, Kai Zhang, Tao Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9348059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to accommodate ever-increasing new tenants and applications, datacenter networks (DCNs) require an efficient load balancing scheme to fully utilize their bisection bandwidth. Equal-cost MultiPath routing (ECMP) is a widely used load-balancing mechanism in the DCN. However, ECMP blindly hashes traffic to parallel paths and results in imbalance and collisions. Motivated by ECMP's shortcomings, some recent schemes provide more visibility into networks via active probing. They could be broadly classified as probing all the paths or a fixed number of paths (e.g., 3 paths) each probe interval. However, they all suffer from some limitations. Probing all paths introduces high probing overhead while probing a fixed number of paths is suboptimal when the network topology and traffic load change. To our best knowledge, none of the existing schemes adapt the number of paths being probed to the network conditions. Enlightened by the defects of previous work, we introduce PLB, an adaptive partial congestion-aware load-balancing mechanism. At its heart, PLB randomly probes partial paths each probe interval and the number of them changes according to the network topology and the traffic load. Besides, PLB splits flow into flowlets and makes careful routing/rerouting decisions for them. Through analysis, we formulate the correlations between the number of paths being probed and the network conditions. Furthermore, simulations with realistic workloads validate our conclusions and show that PLB reduces overall flow completion times compared to the state-of-the-art load balancing schemes both in symmetric and asymmetric topologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9348059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9348059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了适应不断增加的新租户和应用程序,数据中心网络(dcn)需要一个有效的负载平衡方案来充分利用其对分带宽。等价多路径路由(Equal-cost MultiPath routing, ECMP)是DCN中广泛使用的一种负载均衡机制。然而,ECMP盲目地将流量散列到并行路径上,导致不平衡和冲突。由于ECMP的缺点,最近的一些方案通过主动探测提供了更多的网络可见性。它们可以大致分为探测所有路径或每个探测间隔探测固定数量的路径(例如,3条路径)。然而,它们都有一些局限性。探测所有路径会带来很高的探测开销,而当网络拓扑和流量负载发生变化时,探测固定数量的路径是次优的。据我们所知,现有的方案都没有根据网络条件调整被探测路径的数量。在此基础上,提出了一种自适应的部分拥塞感知负载均衡机制PLB。在其核心,PLB在每个探测间隔随机探测部分路径,并且它们的数量根据网络拓扑和流量负载而变化。此外,PLB将流拆分为流,并为它们做出仔细的路由/重路由决策。通过分析,我们建立了被探测路径数与网络条件之间的关系。此外,具有实际工作负载的模拟验证了我们的结论,并表明与对称和非对称拓扑中最先进的负载平衡方案相比,PLB减少了总体流完成时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PLB: Adaptive Partial Congestion-aware Load Balancing for Datacenter Networks
In order to accommodate ever-increasing new tenants and applications, datacenter networks (DCNs) require an efficient load balancing scheme to fully utilize their bisection bandwidth. Equal-cost MultiPath routing (ECMP) is a widely used load-balancing mechanism in the DCN. However, ECMP blindly hashes traffic to parallel paths and results in imbalance and collisions. Motivated by ECMP's shortcomings, some recent schemes provide more visibility into networks via active probing. They could be broadly classified as probing all the paths or a fixed number of paths (e.g., 3 paths) each probe interval. However, they all suffer from some limitations. Probing all paths introduces high probing overhead while probing a fixed number of paths is suboptimal when the network topology and traffic load change. To our best knowledge, none of the existing schemes adapt the number of paths being probed to the network conditions. Enlightened by the defects of previous work, we introduce PLB, an adaptive partial congestion-aware load-balancing mechanism. At its heart, PLB randomly probes partial paths each probe interval and the number of them changes according to the network topology and the traffic load. Besides, PLB splits flow into flowlets and makes careful routing/rerouting decisions for them. Through analysis, we formulate the correlations between the number of paths being probed and the network conditions. Furthermore, simulations with realistic workloads validate our conclusions and show that PLB reduces overall flow completion times compared to the state-of-the-art load balancing schemes both in symmetric and asymmetric topologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AirID: Injecting a Custom RF Fingerprint for Enhanced UAV Identification using Deep Learning Oversampling Algorithm based on Reinforcement Learning in Imbalanced Problems FAST-RAM: A Fast AI-assistant Solution for Task Offloading and Resource Allocation in MEC Achieving Privacy-Preserving Vehicle Selection for Effective Content Dissemination in Smart Cities Age-optimal Transmission Policy for Markov Source with Differential Encoding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1