D. Herrington, E. Vittinghoff, T. Howard, David A. Major, J. Owen, D. Reboussin, D. Bowden, V. Bittner, J. Simon, D. Grady, S. Hulley
{"title":"因子V Leiden,激素替代治疗和女性冠心病静脉血栓栓塞事件的风险","authors":"D. Herrington, E. Vittinghoff, T. Howard, David A. Major, J. Owen, D. Reboussin, D. Bowden, V. Bittner, J. Simon, D. Grady, S. Hulley","doi":"10.1161/01.ATV.0000018301.91721.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oral contraceptive use in women with factor V Leiden is associated with increased rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). However, the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women with factor V Leiden are not known. A nested case-control study was conducted among women with established coronary disease enrolled in 2 randomized clinical trials of HRT, the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) and the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial. The Leiden mutation was present in 8 (16.7%) of 48 cases with VTE compared with only 7 (6.3%) of 112 controls (odds ratio [OR]Leiden 3.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 9.8;P =0.03). In women without the factor V Leiden mutation, risk associated with HRT use was significantly increased (ORHRT 3.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 9.4;P <0.01). On the other hand, in women with the factor V Leiden mutation, the estimated risk associated with HRT was increased nearly 6-fold, although the CIs were wide and included unity (ORHRT 5.7, 95% CI 0.6 to 53.9;P =0.13). The OR for women with the Leiden mutation who were also assigned to HRT compared with wild-type women assigned to placebo was 14.1 (95% CI 2.7 to 72.4, P =0.0015). In women with the factor V Leiden mutation who were treated with HRT, the estimated absolute incidence of VTE was 15.4 of 1000 per year compared with 2.0 of 1000 per year in women without the mutation who were taking a placebo (P =0.0015). On the basis of these data, in women with coronary disease, the estimated number needed to screen for factor V Leiden to avoid an HRT-associated VTE during 5 years of treatment is 376. If factor V Leiden genotyping becomes less expensive, it could be cost effective to screen for the presence of the mutation before instituting HRT in women with coronary disease.","PeriodicalId":8418,"journal":{"name":"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"163","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factor V Leiden, Hormone Replacement Therapy, and Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events in Women With Coronary Disease\",\"authors\":\"D. Herrington, E. Vittinghoff, T. Howard, David A. Major, J. Owen, D. Reboussin, D. Bowden, V. Bittner, J. Simon, D. Grady, S. Hulley\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/01.ATV.0000018301.91721.94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oral contraceptive use in women with factor V Leiden is associated with increased rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). However, the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women with factor V Leiden are not known. A nested case-control study was conducted among women with established coronary disease enrolled in 2 randomized clinical trials of HRT, the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) and the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial. The Leiden mutation was present in 8 (16.7%) of 48 cases with VTE compared with only 7 (6.3%) of 112 controls (odds ratio [OR]Leiden 3.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 9.8;P =0.03). In women without the factor V Leiden mutation, risk associated with HRT use was significantly increased (ORHRT 3.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 9.4;P <0.01). On the other hand, in women with the factor V Leiden mutation, the estimated risk associated with HRT was increased nearly 6-fold, although the CIs were wide and included unity (ORHRT 5.7, 95% CI 0.6 to 53.9;P =0.13). The OR for women with the Leiden mutation who were also assigned to HRT compared with wild-type women assigned to placebo was 14.1 (95% CI 2.7 to 72.4, P =0.0015). In women with the factor V Leiden mutation who were treated with HRT, the estimated absolute incidence of VTE was 15.4 of 1000 per year compared with 2.0 of 1000 per year in women without the mutation who were taking a placebo (P =0.0015). On the basis of these data, in women with coronary disease, the estimated number needed to screen for factor V Leiden to avoid an HRT-associated VTE during 5 years of treatment is 376. If factor V Leiden genotyping becomes less expensive, it could be cost effective to screen for the presence of the mutation before instituting HRT in women with coronary disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"163\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000018301.91721.94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000018301.91721.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 163
摘要
口服避孕药的妇女使用V莱顿因子与静脉血栓栓塞事件(vte)的发生率增加有关。然而,激素替代疗法(HRT)对绝经后Leiden因子V妇女的影响尚不清楚。一项嵌套式病例对照研究纳入了HRT的2项随机临床试验,心脏和雌激素/黄体酮替代研究(HERS)和雌激素替代和动脉粥样硬化(ERA)试验。48例VTE患者中有8例(16.7%)存在Leiden突变,而112例对照中只有7例(6.3%)存在Leiden突变(优势比[OR]Leiden 3.3, 95% CI 1.1 ~ 9.8;P =0.03)。在没有因子V Leiden突变的女性中,与使用HRT相关的风险显著增加(ORHRT 3.7, 95% CI 1.4 ~ 9.4;P <0.01)。另一方面,在Leiden因子V突变的女性中,与HRT相关的估计风险增加了近6倍,尽管CI很宽,包括统一(ORHRT为5.7,95% CI为0.6至53.9;P =0.13)。携带Leiden突变的女性接受HRT治疗与野生型女性接受安慰剂治疗的OR为14.1 (95% CI 2.7 ~ 72.4, P =0.0015)。在接受HRT治疗的有Leiden因子V突变的女性中,静脉血栓栓塞的估计绝对发生率为每年15.4 / 1000,而没有该突变的服用安慰剂的女性为每年2.0 / 1000 (P =0.0015)。在这些数据的基础上,在患有冠状动脉疾病的女性中,在5年的治疗期间,为了避免hrt相关的静脉血栓栓塞,估计需要筛查V - Leiden因子的人数为376人。如果因子V Leiden基因分型变得不那么昂贵,那么在冠心病妇女实施HRT之前筛查突变的存在可能是具有成本效益的。
Factor V Leiden, Hormone Replacement Therapy, and Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events in Women With Coronary Disease
Oral contraceptive use in women with factor V Leiden is associated with increased rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). However, the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women with factor V Leiden are not known. A nested case-control study was conducted among women with established coronary disease enrolled in 2 randomized clinical trials of HRT, the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) and the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial. The Leiden mutation was present in 8 (16.7%) of 48 cases with VTE compared with only 7 (6.3%) of 112 controls (odds ratio [OR]Leiden 3.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 9.8;P =0.03). In women without the factor V Leiden mutation, risk associated with HRT use was significantly increased (ORHRT 3.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 9.4;P <0.01). On the other hand, in women with the factor V Leiden mutation, the estimated risk associated with HRT was increased nearly 6-fold, although the CIs were wide and included unity (ORHRT 5.7, 95% CI 0.6 to 53.9;P =0.13). The OR for women with the Leiden mutation who were also assigned to HRT compared with wild-type women assigned to placebo was 14.1 (95% CI 2.7 to 72.4, P =0.0015). In women with the factor V Leiden mutation who were treated with HRT, the estimated absolute incidence of VTE was 15.4 of 1000 per year compared with 2.0 of 1000 per year in women without the mutation who were taking a placebo (P =0.0015). On the basis of these data, in women with coronary disease, the estimated number needed to screen for factor V Leiden to avoid an HRT-associated VTE during 5 years of treatment is 376. If factor V Leiden genotyping becomes less expensive, it could be cost effective to screen for the presence of the mutation before instituting HRT in women with coronary disease.