联盟与地缘政治

Harvey Starr, Randolph M. Siverson
{"title":"联盟与地缘政治","authors":"Harvey Starr,&nbsp;Randolph M. Siverson","doi":"10.1016/0260-9827(90)90025-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Following the admonition of Most and Starr (1984) that international relations scholars ‘need to reconceptualize <em>exactly what</em> it is that we want to study, and <em>why</em>’ the authors attempt to understand alliances through the broader context of geopolitics and geopolitical perspectives on international relations. Using the ecological triad framework of the Sprouts, and Starr's ‘opportunity and willingness’ framework, alliances are viewed as part of the geopolitical constraints on available possibilities in the system, as part of the set of incentive structures that affect foreign policy decision-making, and as a central mechanism that permits decision-makers to <em>overcome</em> the geopolitical constraints of the system. Drawing on analogies with technology and borders, alliances can be viewed as important tools for overcoming the constraints of geopolitics, and for changing the <em>meaning</em> of the supposedly ‘permanent’ nature of international geography.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101034,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography Quarterly","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 232-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0260-9827(90)90025-6","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alliances and geopolitics\",\"authors\":\"Harvey Starr,&nbsp;Randolph M. Siverson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0260-9827(90)90025-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Following the admonition of Most and Starr (1984) that international relations scholars ‘need to reconceptualize <em>exactly what</em> it is that we want to study, and <em>why</em>’ the authors attempt to understand alliances through the broader context of geopolitics and geopolitical perspectives on international relations. Using the ecological triad framework of the Sprouts, and Starr's ‘opportunity and willingness’ framework, alliances are viewed as part of the geopolitical constraints on available possibilities in the system, as part of the set of incentive structures that affect foreign policy decision-making, and as a central mechanism that permits decision-makers to <em>overcome</em> the geopolitical constraints of the system. Drawing on analogies with technology and borders, alliances can be viewed as important tools for overcoming the constraints of geopolitics, and for changing the <em>meaning</em> of the supposedly ‘permanent’ nature of international geography.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Geography Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 232-248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0260-9827(90)90025-6\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Geography Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0260982790900256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0260982790900256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

根据Most和Starr(1984)的告诫,国际关系学者“需要重新定义我们想要研究的到底是什么,以及为什么”,作者试图通过更广泛的地缘政治背景和国际关系的地缘政治视角来理解联盟。利用生态三元框架和斯塔尔的“机会和意愿”框架,联盟被视为系统中可用可能性的地缘政治约束的一部分,是影响外交政策决策的一套激励结构的一部分,是允许决策者克服系统地缘政治约束的核心机制。与技术和边界类似,联盟可以被视为克服地缘政治限制的重要工具,并改变国际地理所谓的“永久性”性质的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alliances and geopolitics

Following the admonition of Most and Starr (1984) that international relations scholars ‘need to reconceptualize exactly what it is that we want to study, and why’ the authors attempt to understand alliances through the broader context of geopolitics and geopolitical perspectives on international relations. Using the ecological triad framework of the Sprouts, and Starr's ‘opportunity and willingness’ framework, alliances are viewed as part of the geopolitical constraints on available possibilities in the system, as part of the set of incentive structures that affect foreign policy decision-making, and as a central mechanism that permits decision-makers to overcome the geopolitical constraints of the system. Drawing on analogies with technology and borders, alliances can be viewed as important tools for overcoming the constraints of geopolitics, and for changing the meaning of the supposedly ‘permanent’ nature of international geography.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interstate conflict over exchanges of homeland territory, 1816–1980 The global environmental movement: Reclaiming paradise The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth The new geopolitics of minerals: Canada and international resource trade Caring for workers' dependents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1