水驱采油的最佳润湿性是多少?

Wajdi Alnoush, A. Shaat, Nayef Alyafei
{"title":"水驱采油的最佳润湿性是多少?","authors":"Wajdi Alnoush, A. Shaat, Nayef Alyafei","doi":"10.2118/200232-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This work provides a review of Improved/Enhanced oil recovery research to answer the critical question about the optimum wettability for oil recovery through conventional and low salinity waterflooding (LSW). As the answer is not straightforward, this work investigates conflicting views in a manner that justifies conclusions and provides comparisons between different rock types and conditions. Analysis relating all parameters affecting oil recovery is linked to wettability to identify the optimum state for different waterflooding schemes.\n Relying solely on core-based analysis, or any other method, is argued to be not conclusive without considering the conditions of core handling and testing, pore-network structure, contact angle tests, and field-scale considerations. Therefore, comprehensive conclusions should come from cross-factor analysis rather than isolating certain factors, when studying optimum wettability for oil recovery. This work provides a reference for researchers to approach this dichotomy through an overview of previous works in this area.","PeriodicalId":10912,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the Optimum Wettability for Oil Recovery Through Waterflooding?\",\"authors\":\"Wajdi Alnoush, A. Shaat, Nayef Alyafei\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/200232-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This work provides a review of Improved/Enhanced oil recovery research to answer the critical question about the optimum wettability for oil recovery through conventional and low salinity waterflooding (LSW). As the answer is not straightforward, this work investigates conflicting views in a manner that justifies conclusions and provides comparisons between different rock types and conditions. Analysis relating all parameters affecting oil recovery is linked to wettability to identify the optimum state for different waterflooding schemes.\\n Relying solely on core-based analysis, or any other method, is argued to be not conclusive without considering the conditions of core handling and testing, pore-network structure, contact angle tests, and field-scale considerations. Therefore, comprehensive conclusions should come from cross-factor analysis rather than isolating certain factors, when studying optimum wettability for oil recovery. This work provides a reference for researchers to approach this dichotomy through an overview of previous works in this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/200232-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200232-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对提高采收率的研究进行了综述,以回答常规和低矿化度水驱(LSW)采油的最佳润湿性这一关键问题。由于答案并不直截了当,这项工作以一种证明结论的方式调查了相互矛盾的观点,并提供了不同岩石类型和条件之间的比较。将影响采收率的所有参数与润湿性联系起来进行分析,以确定不同注水方案的最佳状态。如果不考虑岩心处理和测试的条件、孔隙网络结构、接触角测试和现场规模的考虑,仅仅依靠基于岩心的分析或任何其他方法都不能得出结论。因此,在研究采油最佳润湿性时,应通过交叉因素分析得出综合结论,而不是孤立地考虑某些因素。这项工作提供了一个参考,研究人员接近这种二分法,通过对以往的工作在这一领域的概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is the Optimum Wettability for Oil Recovery Through Waterflooding?
This work provides a review of Improved/Enhanced oil recovery research to answer the critical question about the optimum wettability for oil recovery through conventional and low salinity waterflooding (LSW). As the answer is not straightforward, this work investigates conflicting views in a manner that justifies conclusions and provides comparisons between different rock types and conditions. Analysis relating all parameters affecting oil recovery is linked to wettability to identify the optimum state for different waterflooding schemes. Relying solely on core-based analysis, or any other method, is argued to be not conclusive without considering the conditions of core handling and testing, pore-network structure, contact angle tests, and field-scale considerations. Therefore, comprehensive conclusions should come from cross-factor analysis rather than isolating certain factors, when studying optimum wettability for oil recovery. This work provides a reference for researchers to approach this dichotomy through an overview of previous works in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sea-Fastening Analysis and Design of a Horizontally Transported Large Jacket Brownfield Waterflood Management - Strategic Implementation of Field Trial Learning, South Oman Interpretation of the Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Pilot in West Salym Using Tracers What is the Optimum Wettability for Oil Recovery Through Waterflooding? In-Situ Wettability Determination Using Magnetic Resonance Restricted Diffusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1