拆分api:软件解绑的探索性研究

Anderson Severo de Matos, João Bosco Ferreira Filho, Lincoln Souza Rocha
{"title":"拆分api:软件解绑的探索性研究","authors":"Anderson Severo de Matos, João Bosco Ferreira Filho, Lincoln Souza Rocha","doi":"10.1109/MSR.2019.00062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software unbundling consists of dividing an existing software artifact into smaller ones. Unbundling can be useful for removing clutter from the original application or separating different features that may not share the same purpose, or simply for isolating an emergent functionality that merits to be an application on its own. This phenomenon is frequent with mobile apps and it is also propagating to APIs. This paper proposes a first empirical study on unbundling to understand its effects on popular APIs. We explore the possibilities of splitting libraries into 2 or more bundles based on the use that their client projects make of them. We mine over than 71,000 client projects of 10 open source APIs and automatically generate 2,090 sub-APIs to then study their properties. We find that it is possible to have sets of different ways of using a given API and to unbundle it accordingly; the bundles can vary their representativeness and uniqueness, which is analyzed thoroughly in this study.","PeriodicalId":6706,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"245 1","pages":"360-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Splitting APIs: An Exploratory Study of Software Unbundling\",\"authors\":\"Anderson Severo de Matos, João Bosco Ferreira Filho, Lincoln Souza Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MSR.2019.00062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software unbundling consists of dividing an existing software artifact into smaller ones. Unbundling can be useful for removing clutter from the original application or separating different features that may not share the same purpose, or simply for isolating an emergent functionality that merits to be an application on its own. This phenomenon is frequent with mobile apps and it is also propagating to APIs. This paper proposes a first empirical study on unbundling to understand its effects on popular APIs. We explore the possibilities of splitting libraries into 2 or more bundles based on the use that their client projects make of them. We mine over than 71,000 client projects of 10 open source APIs and automatically generate 2,090 sub-APIs to then study their properties. We find that it is possible to have sets of different ways of using a given API and to unbundle it accordingly; the bundles can vary their representativeness and uniqueness, which is analyzed thoroughly in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)\",\"volume\":\"245 1\",\"pages\":\"360-370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2019.00062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2019.00062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软件解绑包括将现有的软件构件划分为更小的构件。解绑定可以用于从原始应用程序中删除混乱,或者分离可能不具有相同目的的不同功能,或者仅仅用于隔离适合单独作为应用程序的紧急功能。这种现象在移动应用中很常见,而且也蔓延到了api中。本文提出了对解绑的第一个实证研究,以了解其对流行api的影响。我们将根据客户端项目对库的使用情况,探讨将库拆分为2个或更多个包的可能性。我们从10个开源api中挖掘了超过71,000个客户端项目,并自动生成2,090个子api,然后研究它们的属性。我们发现有可能有一组不同的方式来使用一个给定的API,并相应地解除它的捆绑;这些束具有不同的代表性和独特性,本研究对此进行了深入的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Splitting APIs: An Exploratory Study of Software Unbundling
Software unbundling consists of dividing an existing software artifact into smaller ones. Unbundling can be useful for removing clutter from the original application or separating different features that may not share the same purpose, or simply for isolating an emergent functionality that merits to be an application on its own. This phenomenon is frequent with mobile apps and it is also propagating to APIs. This paper proposes a first empirical study on unbundling to understand its effects on popular APIs. We explore the possibilities of splitting libraries into 2 or more bundles based on the use that their client projects make of them. We mine over than 71,000 client projects of 10 open source APIs and automatically generate 2,090 sub-APIs to then study their properties. We find that it is possible to have sets of different ways of using a given API and to unbundle it accordingly; the bundles can vary their representativeness and uniqueness, which is analyzed thoroughly in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SeSaMe: A Data Set of Semantically Similar Java Methods Lessons Learned from Using a Deep Tree-Based Model for Software Defect Prediction in Practice STRAIT: A Tool for Automated Software Reliability Growth Analysis Assessing Diffusion and Perception of Test Smells in Scala Projects An Empirical History of Permission Requests and Mistakes in Open Source Android Apps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1