COVID-19疫苗接种:疗效和经济效益(以制药公司为例)

N. Alber, Mansour Abdelrhim, Mahmoud Farouh
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗接种:疗效和经济效益(以制药公司为例)","authors":"N. Alber, Mansour Abdelrhim, Mahmoud Farouh","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v16n2p54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper empirically investigates two sides of the COVID-19 vaccinations. The first part is a study of the vaccination efficacy and its impact on the number of new cases and new deaths, using the daily doses data of Eight different COVID-19 vaccination for a sample of 30 countries around the world. The second part is a study of the financial benefits for the same eight vaccines producers’ companies. The event study method is adopted in this research to explore the abnormal returns and its accumulations, the event date is January 30, 2020. \n \nThe Vaccine’s efficacy results show that (Moderna, Oxford/Astrazeneca, and Novavax V) proved efficacy in reducing new cases and new deaths. Meanwhile, Cansino’s vaccine was effective in reducing the number of new cases only. On the other hand, vaccines like (Pfizer/ Biontech, Sinovac, Johnson & Johnson, and Sinopharm/ Beijing) didn’t prove efficacy in reducing the number of new cases and new deaths. \n \nThe Financial benefits results show that the vaccine manufacturers who achieved the benefits of abnormal returns in the presence of vaccine efficacy are (Oxford/AstraZeneca and Novavax). While other manufacturers did not achieve the benefits of abnormal returns. The results also show that the pharmaceutical companies that achieved benefits on the cumulative abnormal returns in the presence of the vaccine efficacy are (Oxford/AstraZeneca, Novavax, Moderna, and CanSino). Meanwhile, the rest of manufacturers achieved cumulative abnormal returns but they are not effective in reducing the numbers of neither new cases nor new deaths.","PeriodicalId":13861,"journal":{"name":"International journal of business research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Vaccinations: Efficacy and Financial Benefits (The Case of the Pharmaceutical Companies)\",\"authors\":\"N. Alber, Mansour Abdelrhim, Mahmoud Farouh\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/ibr.v16n2p54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper empirically investigates two sides of the COVID-19 vaccinations. The first part is a study of the vaccination efficacy and its impact on the number of new cases and new deaths, using the daily doses data of Eight different COVID-19 vaccination for a sample of 30 countries around the world. The second part is a study of the financial benefits for the same eight vaccines producers’ companies. The event study method is adopted in this research to explore the abnormal returns and its accumulations, the event date is January 30, 2020. \\n \\nThe Vaccine’s efficacy results show that (Moderna, Oxford/Astrazeneca, and Novavax V) proved efficacy in reducing new cases and new deaths. Meanwhile, Cansino’s vaccine was effective in reducing the number of new cases only. On the other hand, vaccines like (Pfizer/ Biontech, Sinovac, Johnson & Johnson, and Sinopharm/ Beijing) didn’t prove efficacy in reducing the number of new cases and new deaths. \\n \\nThe Financial benefits results show that the vaccine manufacturers who achieved the benefits of abnormal returns in the presence of vaccine efficacy are (Oxford/AstraZeneca and Novavax). While other manufacturers did not achieve the benefits of abnormal returns. The results also show that the pharmaceutical companies that achieved benefits on the cumulative abnormal returns in the presence of the vaccine efficacy are (Oxford/AstraZeneca, Novavax, Moderna, and CanSino). Meanwhile, the rest of manufacturers achieved cumulative abnormal returns but they are not effective in reducing the numbers of neither new cases nor new deaths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of business research\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of business research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v16n2p54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of business research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v16n2p54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对COVID-19疫苗接种的两个方面进行了实证研究。第一部分是利用全球30个国家样本中8种不同的COVID-19疫苗的日剂量数据,研究疫苗接种效果及其对新发病例和新发死亡人数的影响。第二部分是对这八家疫苗生产企业的经济利益的研究。本研究采用事件研究法探讨异常收益及其累积,事件日期为2020年1月30日。疫苗的功效结果表明(Moderna、Oxford/Astrazeneca和Novavax V)在减少新发病例和新死亡病例方面证明有效。与此同时,坎西诺的疫苗仅在减少新病例数量方面有效。另一方面,像辉瑞/生物科技、科兴、强生和国药/北京这样的疫苗在减少新病例和新死亡人数方面并没有证明有效。财务效益结果显示,在疫苗效力存在的情况下获得异常回报效益的疫苗制造商是(牛津/阿斯利康和诺瓦瓦克斯)。而其他厂商却没有实现非正常收益。结果还显示,在疫苗效力存在的情况下,在累积异常收益上获得收益的制药公司为(Oxford/AstraZeneca、Novavax、Moderna和CanSino)。与此同时,其他制造商获得了累积的异常回报,但它们在减少新病例和新死亡人数方面都没有有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 Vaccinations: Efficacy and Financial Benefits (The Case of the Pharmaceutical Companies)
This paper empirically investigates two sides of the COVID-19 vaccinations. The first part is a study of the vaccination efficacy and its impact on the number of new cases and new deaths, using the daily doses data of Eight different COVID-19 vaccination for a sample of 30 countries around the world. The second part is a study of the financial benefits for the same eight vaccines producers’ companies. The event study method is adopted in this research to explore the abnormal returns and its accumulations, the event date is January 30, 2020. The Vaccine’s efficacy results show that (Moderna, Oxford/Astrazeneca, and Novavax V) proved efficacy in reducing new cases and new deaths. Meanwhile, Cansino’s vaccine was effective in reducing the number of new cases only. On the other hand, vaccines like (Pfizer/ Biontech, Sinovac, Johnson & Johnson, and Sinopharm/ Beijing) didn’t prove efficacy in reducing the number of new cases and new deaths. The Financial benefits results show that the vaccine manufacturers who achieved the benefits of abnormal returns in the presence of vaccine efficacy are (Oxford/AstraZeneca and Novavax). While other manufacturers did not achieve the benefits of abnormal returns. The results also show that the pharmaceutical companies that achieved benefits on the cumulative abnormal returns in the presence of the vaccine efficacy are (Oxford/AstraZeneca, Novavax, Moderna, and CanSino). Meanwhile, the rest of manufacturers achieved cumulative abnormal returns but they are not effective in reducing the numbers of neither new cases nor new deaths.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IDENTIFYING LEADERSHIP ETHICS: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF WARRICK'S (1981) LEADERSHIP STYLE IDENTIFIER FRAMEWORK Banking Transparency, Financial Information and Liquidity Risk Management: Case of Saudi Banks Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Business Research, Vol. 16, No. 11 Birth Order and Executive Risk-Taking: A Study on CEO Behavioral Disposition The Chance of FinTech to be a New General-Purpose Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1