{"title":"EDTA-Na和dtpachelation剂去除污染土壤中的铯","authors":"Amal Elshazly, Ihab M. Farid, M. Rizk, M. Abbas","doi":"10.21608/bjas.2023.203043.1153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil contamination with Cs possesses a serious environmental threat; and therefore, its remediation is an obligation to ensure environmental safety. The current study aims at evaluating the efficiency of using either EDTA-Na or DTPA as chelating agents for removal of Cs from contaminated soils. Three soils (a clayey oneand two sandy loam soils differing in the organic matter and CaCO 3 contents) were selected to attain this aim.Samples of the soils under study were artificially contaminated with CsCl at three levels i.e. 50, 100, and 200 mg Cs kg -1 . These samples were subjected to sequential extraction pre- and post- leaching to find out Cs redistribution among the different soil fractions after soil washing. The implications of soil washing with the investigated chelating agents on decreasing the risk assessment hazards associated with Cs hazards are discussed in this study. Key results indicated that DTPA was more efficient in removal of Cs from the contaminated soils than the EDTA-Nadidand both decreased considerably soil Cs, particularly from those which are considered the mobile fractions (water soluble and exchangeable fractions) beside of the carbonate bound fractions. Accordingly, the calculated risk assessment code declined noticeably from ―very high risk‖ levels (more than 50) to ―medium risk‖ levels (ranging from 30 to 50 ) for most spiked soils. In conclusion, DTPA and EDTA-Na are effective chelating agents in reducing the risks associated with Cs contamination in soils.","PeriodicalId":8745,"journal":{"name":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of cesium from contaminated soils using EDTA-Na and DTPAchelating agents\",\"authors\":\"Amal Elshazly, Ihab M. Farid, M. Rizk, M. Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/bjas.2023.203043.1153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil contamination with Cs possesses a serious environmental threat; and therefore, its remediation is an obligation to ensure environmental safety. The current study aims at evaluating the efficiency of using either EDTA-Na or DTPA as chelating agents for removal of Cs from contaminated soils. Three soils (a clayey oneand two sandy loam soils differing in the organic matter and CaCO 3 contents) were selected to attain this aim.Samples of the soils under study were artificially contaminated with CsCl at three levels i.e. 50, 100, and 200 mg Cs kg -1 . These samples were subjected to sequential extraction pre- and post- leaching to find out Cs redistribution among the different soil fractions after soil washing. The implications of soil washing with the investigated chelating agents on decreasing the risk assessment hazards associated with Cs hazards are discussed in this study. Key results indicated that DTPA was more efficient in removal of Cs from the contaminated soils than the EDTA-Nadidand both decreased considerably soil Cs, particularly from those which are considered the mobile fractions (water soluble and exchangeable fractions) beside of the carbonate bound fractions. Accordingly, the calculated risk assessment code declined noticeably from ―very high risk‖ levels (more than 50) to ―medium risk‖ levels (ranging from 30 to 50 ) for most spiked soils. In conclusion, DTPA and EDTA-Na are effective chelating agents in reducing the risks associated with Cs contamination in soils.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2023.203043.1153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2023.203043.1153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
土壤Cs污染具有严重的环境威胁;因此,其整治是确保环境安全的义务。本研究旨在评价EDTA-Na或DTPA作为螯合剂去除污染土壤中Cs的效率。为了达到这一目的,选择了三种土壤(一种粘土土壤和两种砂壤土,有机质和caco3含量不同)。所研究的土壤样品分别被人工污染了50、100和200 mg Cs kg -1。对这些样品进行浸前和浸后的连续提取,以了解土壤洗涤后不同土壤组分间Cs的分布情况。本研究讨论了用所研究的螯合剂进行土壤洗涤对降低与Cs危害相关的风险评估危害的意义。关键结果表明,DTPA比edta - nadad更有效地去除污染土壤中的碳,并且两者都显著降低了土壤中的碳,特别是那些被认为是碳酸盐结合组分之外的流动组分(水溶性组分和交换性组分)。因此,对于大多数尖刺土壤,计算出的风险评估代码从“非常高风险‖水平(大于50)”明显下降到“中风险‖水平(范围从30到50)”。总之,DTPA和EDTA-Na是有效的螯合剂,可以降低土壤中Cs污染的风险。
Removal of cesium from contaminated soils using EDTA-Na and DTPAchelating agents
Soil contamination with Cs possesses a serious environmental threat; and therefore, its remediation is an obligation to ensure environmental safety. The current study aims at evaluating the efficiency of using either EDTA-Na or DTPA as chelating agents for removal of Cs from contaminated soils. Three soils (a clayey oneand two sandy loam soils differing in the organic matter and CaCO 3 contents) were selected to attain this aim.Samples of the soils under study were artificially contaminated with CsCl at three levels i.e. 50, 100, and 200 mg Cs kg -1 . These samples were subjected to sequential extraction pre- and post- leaching to find out Cs redistribution among the different soil fractions after soil washing. The implications of soil washing with the investigated chelating agents on decreasing the risk assessment hazards associated with Cs hazards are discussed in this study. Key results indicated that DTPA was more efficient in removal of Cs from the contaminated soils than the EDTA-Nadidand both decreased considerably soil Cs, particularly from those which are considered the mobile fractions (water soluble and exchangeable fractions) beside of the carbonate bound fractions. Accordingly, the calculated risk assessment code declined noticeably from ―very high risk‖ levels (more than 50) to ―medium risk‖ levels (ranging from 30 to 50 ) for most spiked soils. In conclusion, DTPA and EDTA-Na are effective chelating agents in reducing the risks associated with Cs contamination in soils.